Home Subscribe Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

Opinion


LETTERS: Web gambling ban totally unworkable

To the editor:

As the Nevada director for the Poker Players Alliance, a grass-roots poker advocacy group with more than 1 million members nationwide and 12,870 in Nevada, I was concerned to read that Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., wants to speed up enforcement of the vaguely and broadly written law banning Internet gambling -- the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act ("Internet gambling ban architect frustrated with regulation delays," Wednesday Review-Journal).

Frankly, the confusion regulators are dealing with as they develop the regulations to enforce the law is a direct result of how this act was written and sneaked into a must-pass port security bill in the dead of night, allowing no time for review and debate.

One of the most egregious flaws in the bill is that it does not define "unlawful Internet gambling," clearly something that legislation making Internet gambling unlawful should include.


Most Popular Stories
  • SHERMAN FREDERICK: Hillary's best hope: racism
  • J.C. WATTS: Your side, my side and the truth
  • J.C. WATTS: Social conservatives still a political force
  • JOHN BRUMMETT: It's the worst of all worlds for the DemocratsCommentary
  • EDITORIAL: Billing Mrs. Fossett
  • EDITORIAL: Just 'trust our incumbent senators'
  • EDITORIAL: It's now illegal to carry cash?
  • LETTERS: Tipping 'expert' a total cheapskate
  • ERIN NEFF: They just figured it was a lingerie supplier
  • LETTERS: To boost revenue, repeal smoking law



  • This law is clearly unworkable, as regulators, bankers and several members of Nevada's congressional delegation have publicly stated. To truly place checks and balances on Internet gambling, Congress should look to existing legislation that would seek to regulate online gambling in order to protect children and problem gamblers and collect the billions of dollars in lost tax revenue from these transactions.

    Let's not blame regulators for struggling to enact his flawed and ambiguous bill and start looking for workable solutions to truly regulate this growing online industry.

    Ken Illgen

    LAS VEGAS

    THE WRITER IS NEVADA DIRECTOR OF THE POKER PLAYERS ALLIANCE.

    Child abuse disclosure

    To the editor:

    In response to your Tuesday report, "Group gives Nevada high mark for child abuse policies":

    I applaud the Nevada Legislature for voting in the most recent session to broaden the laws providing for public disclosure of child abuse fatalities. However, this article, about a recent report that gave Nevada a grade of "A" for its disclosure policies, failed to note the report's limitations. While the report examined state disclosure policies, it did not determine if or how these policies are being implemented. Obviously, such testing would require much more time and resources.

    I commend First Star and the Children's Advocacy Institute, which authored the report, for calling attention to the issue of disclosure around child abuse fatalities. Despite a federal law mandating such disclosure, many states do not provide it. It is now up to the public to test whether Nevada and other states that received high grades are implementing their policies effectively.

    Donna Coleman

    HENDERSON

    Illegals and health care

    To the editor:

    I found it ironic that on the day before "May Day," when pro-illegal alien groups around the country marched again to request "rights for illegals," that the Review-Journal articles "Hospitals seek cash before chemo" and "More providers in LV Valley now billing in advance" said nothing about one of the main causes of the financial problems in our hospitals -- illegal aliens getting medical care for free.

    Nowhere in either of these two articles is there any mention made about the main reason for non-payment of medical bills -- illegal immigrants.

    Pretty sad when American citizens are paying the price (literally and figuratively) when it comes to illegal aliens and the drain they put on our health care and hospital systems.

    Colleen Anna

    HENDERSON

    Water boondoggle

    To the editor:

    Very soon, we are going to be forced to approve the construction of a water pipeline from Northern Nevada to supply the water needs of formerly "fast-growing" Southern Nevada. Of course, the cost of the water pipeline will be paid by Clark County taxpayers, and its estimated cost has bounced from $2 billion to $3.5 billion.

    The push is being led by Pat Mulroy, the Southern Nevada Water Authority head honcho. I saw her on TV a while back, and she railed at the idea that this was nothing but a union-backed boondoggle that mostly helps developers and builders. Like the "Big Dig" in Boston.

    I just happened to read about a desalination plant under construction in Sydney, Australia. Sydney was plagued by drought for a number of years, so officials decided to build a controversial plant to boost supplies. The original cost was estimated to be $500 million. But now it's about three-quarters done, and the cost is expected to be more than $1.9 billion. And, of course, it's now raining like crazy, and the city's reservoirs are filling up without the plant.

    But the construction of the plant is going forward. This from Sydney Morning Herald columnist Miranda Devine: "Water Minister Nathan Rees -- nicknamed Sergeant Schultz by Sydney residents because, like the 'Hogan's Heroes' character, he 'knows nothink' -- seems intent only on hosing down controversy by throwing taxpayer money at it. Maybe he doesn't understand the complaints reflect the mood of a sullen state."

    Man, even with the German connection, I hope we don't have a Sergeant Schultz -- or especially a Colonel Klink -- in charge at the Southern Nevada Water Authority. We just simply can't afford such a massive expenditure of our money -- yes, our money.

    Robert Duggan

    HENDERSON

    Links powered by inform.com


    Leave Your Comment 15 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    timinator wrote on May 05, 2008 08:47 PM: When it all comes down, as it most assuredly will, remember the members of BOTH PARTIES that have done this to America.

    They justify a stupid war in Iraq because of potential terrorism, yet leave our borders open to whatever can drag its sorry butt across the border.

    These are not Republican or Democrat issues, these are American issues. Let's quit falling for the partisan BS. There will be no America left if we do not stop the political infighting and fix these and other problems.

    We cannot go much further, socially, financially or spiritually if we do not force our leaders, from both parties, to do what is right for America. Not for big business, big banks, big unions, big government, but for Americans.

    The jackals are at our doorstep and we are too afraid to just deal with it. We must quit blaming the other guy's party for all the problems. The republicrats are the same party, and have been for decades. This charade must end!


    B Henderson wrote on May 05, 2008 07:23 PM: Why would anyone gamble online? Must be a sickness! Or perhaps total idiots!


    Sad Summerlin wrote on May 05, 2008 05:29 PM: J - Excellent post. I am going to use yours as a launching point...

    We hear the drum beat every day at how bad things are over in Iraq. How many US soldiers are killed by roadside bombs, how many innocent civilians are killed and how Iran and Syria are funding these factions to assist in providing instability to Iraq. As you notice, there is nothing controversial in what I just said... just stating facts. If I am wrong and there is controversy in those statements, let me know.

    We know the facts of the war. The total American dead.

    HERE COMES THE CONTROVERSY

    It is all meant to distract you from what is really going on here at home that no one wants to admit or cover.

    While the insurgents and funding from Iran and Syria are not 100% of the problem in Iraq, the same can be said about illegal aliens here. They may not be 100% of the problem, but they are sure a large percentage of the CAUSE of the problem. Eliminate them, and we can move on to eliminating the balance. Just as if we eliminate the funding of Iran and Syria to the Iraq insurgents, our problems there will start to go away...

    What problems have significant illegal immigration issues:

    1) Jobs and Economic loss to naturalized citizens
    2) Pressure of services like schools and medical
    3) Security

    We talk about our failing overcrowded schools (REMOVE THE ILLEGALS)

    We talk about our expensive hospitals (REMOVE THE ILLEGALS)

    We talk about our failing economy (REMOVE THE ILLEGALS)

    The message is clear... so why aren't we listening?


    J wrote on May 05, 2008 03:44 PM: Joe C and oldlawdawg...

    I wish I could find the link to the story about "ILLEGALS who can get insurance from their employers by having money taken out of their paychecks, but instead they use another fake ID and go to the emergency rooms for health-care. A few told the reporter "WHY SHOULD WE PAY WHEN WE GET IT FREE"!

    To top it off there was a wreck in either Texas or Arizona that I heard of on the radio last week, a pickup truck packed with about 50 (YES 50) "ILLEGALS" flipped over because the driver was drunk and speeding. 18 had to be life-flighted to hospitals, how much do you think it costs for a helicopter ride to the hospital and who do you think is going to pay for it?

    But lets not forget the real cost to Americans, that being that every day "DRUNK DRIVING ILLEGALS" kill Americans. Kill enough of US right here in the STATES, that if you go from the start of war in Afghanistan, more American people have been killed here at home than our SOLDIERS in Afghanistan and Iraq combined.

    But no so called news station has a tote board showing these numbers like they do for our SOLDIERS who are killed.


    Joe C wrote on May 05, 2008 12:38 PM: To oldlawdawg,,
    I agree with you to a certain point about medical costs.
    Greedy insurance and pharmaceutical companies share much of the blame. When you have United Health Care CEO retiring with a 400 million dollar package.
    It’s not hard to see why costs are high for everyone including doctors insurance. Possibly one reason for setting up the fast food mentality for doctor care and tests.

    We cannot underestimate the costs from illegal aliens.
    Katie Couric did a new story about births at just one hospital in Texas. Where 40% of all birth are from illegals.
    Of course this is disputed by pro-illegal groups.
    Saying hospitals cannot have accurate stats since they cannot ask citizenship. Yet the pro-group some how come up with their own accurate stats about cost.
    The truth is hospitals, schools, social services etc cannot ask citizenship and if anything the cost from illegal aliens is grossly underestimated.


    Harold Sawchuck wrote on May 05, 2008 11:03 AM: Regarding the Big Dig Union boondoggle. The final price was 14.7 Billion dollars. It originally had a precise estimate of 2.7 Billion dollars. This is not counting the still ongoing cost for repairs due to severe leaks directly blamed on shoddy design and incompetent labor and supervision. Not counting the repair costs when a ceiling panel crushed a car in the tunnel, killing one person, due to incorrect installation of epoxy bolts.

    Be prepared for seeing such terms as unknown impediments, unforeseen delays, material cost overruns, material shortages, contract disputes, and my favorite "force majeure". If you don't know that last one, you will, soon enough.

    My guess on the ultimate cost for the Mulroy/Klink Great Gouge is 4 Billion dollars of your money. Better hustle a lot of tips, people, because you know the unions, the builders, and the developers money will be going directly to the source. 'Way to go, Pattie.


    free bet wrote on May 05, 2008 08:20 AM: free bet

    i think it has worked, unfortunately for us in the internet gambling industry, but it shouldnt be in place


    oldlawdawg wrote on May 05, 2008 08:02 AM: Ms. Anna:

    The problem stems from too many uninsured people needing medical care the can only get through an emergency room, not just illegal aliens. Illegal immigration is an enormously costly problem, but is by no means the main problem underlying national healthcare woes -- woes that will never be solved as long as we blame them on immigration rather than insurance industry greed and control over our politicians, the pharmaceutical industry and the hospitals themselves. Hillary's plan will only penalize those who cannot afford her mandatory insurance program, and make the insurance industry even more powerful than it already is. Blaming illegal immigration misses the point by a mile.


    Russ wrote on May 05, 2008 07:40 AM: For all you complaining about efforts to keep water flowing in the valley, when supplies get low and the real rationing starts, I hope you all will move or give up your share to the rest of us. Now get over it.


    Mike L. wrote on May 05, 2008 07:01 AM: Watch how the nation-state dies: it cannot control gambling, among other things, with the internet, and it cannot control its borders. All good, I say. Maybe wars and taxation will go as well.


    Read All Comments