Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - Opinion

Thursday
Mar 18, 2010
Clouds And Sun
Clouds And Sun 54° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu

Opinion


VIN SUPRYNOWICZ: 'It took about three years to break most kids'

A local reader writes in:

"I have been reading your series of columns on schools with much interest and I'm in full agreement with you. But I was wondering if you are aware of what goes on in the Clark County school system in regards to the treatment of students, ... policies and actions that border on something straight out of a prison.


Most Popular Stories
  1. Judging a judge
  2. Open ... and shut
  3. A lottery would raise money for education
  4. Only the private sector can create wealth
  5. Net neutrality
  6. Open court



"Students who are deemed 'behavior' problems are expelled from regular school and sent to something called 'behavior school'. Once there they can expect to be strip searched -- strip searched. I still find this hard to comprehend. The system apparently treats children as some sort of enemy, to be controlled, to ensure docile compliance.

"Some schools have instituted dress codes whereby a student can be expelled if their clothes are wrinkled, if they wear a belt deemed 'inappropriate.' ... One mother expressed to me her feeling that it's almost as if the district wants students to quit, rather than bother trying to actually educate them in anything."

Let us now conclude our occasional series on this topic by pointing out, once again, that this all seems far less puzzling and more predictable to those who have dug into "The Underground History of American Education," 2003, by former New York City (and state) Teacher of the Year John Taylor Gatto.

By the beginning of the 20th century, those who organized our current government schooling system on the European model were well on their way to perfecting a system in which, in their view, "effective early indoctrination of all children would lead to an orderly scientific society, one controlled by the best people, now freed from the obsolete straitjacket of democratic traditions and historic American libertarian attitudes," Mr. Gatto reports in his masterwork.

"Forced schooling was the medicine to bring the whole continental population into conformity with these plans so that it might be regarded as a 'human resource' and managed as a 'work force.' No more Ben Franklins or Tom Edisons could be allowed; they set a bad example. One way to manage this was to see to it that individuals were prevented from taking up their working lives until an advanced age when the ardor of youth and its insufferable self-confidence had cooled. ...

"For a considerable time ... social managers of schooling were remarkably candid about what they were doing. In a speech he gave before businessmen prior to the First World War, Woodrow Wilson made this unabashed disclosure:

" 'We want one class to have a liberal education. We want another class, a very much larger class of necessity, to forgo the privilege of a liberal education and fit themselves to perform specific difficult manual tasks.'

"By 1917, the major administrative jobs in American schooling were under the control of a group referred to in the press of that day as 'the Education Trust' ... (including) representatives of Rockefeller, Carnegie, Harvard, Stanford, the University of Chicago, and the National Education Association. The chief end, wrote Benjamin Kidd, the British evolutionist, in 1918, was to 'impose on the young the ideal of subordination.'

"Arthur Calhoun's 1919 'Social History of the Family' ... declared that the fondest wish of utopian writers was coming true, the child was passing from its family 'into the custody of community experts.' ...

"Schools train individuals to respond as a mass. Boys and girls are drilled in being bored, frightened, envious, emotionally needy, generally incomplete. A successful mass production economy requires such a clientele. A small business, small farm economy like that of the Amish requires individual competence, thoughtfulness, compassion, and universal participation; our own requires a managed mass of leveled, spiritless, anxious, familyless, friendless, godless, and obedient people who believe the difference between 'Cheers' and 'Seinfeld' is a subject worth arguing about. ...

"School is the first impression children get of organized society; like most first impressions, it is the lasting one. Life according to school is dull and stupid, only consumption promises relief: Coke, Big Macs, fashion jeans, that's where real meaning is found, that is the classroom's lesson, however indirectly delivered.

"The decisive dynamics which make forced schooling poisonous to healthy human development aren't hard to spot. Work in classrooms isn't significant work; it fails to satisfy real needs pressing on the individual; it doesn't answer real questions experience raises in the young mind; it doesn't contribute to solving any problem encountered in actual life. The net effect of making all schoolwork external to individual longings, experiences, questions, and problems is to render the victim listless. ...

"As I watched it happen, it took about three years to break most kids, three years confined to environments of emotional neediness with nothing real to do. ...

"The strongest meshes of the school net are invisible. Constant bidding for a stranger's attention creates a chemistry producing the common characteristics of modern schoolchildren: whining, dishonesty, malice, treachery, cruelty. Unceasing competition for official favor in the dramatic fish bowl of a classroom delivers cowardly children, little people sunk in chronic boredom, little people with no apparent purpose for being alive. ...

"The most destructive dynamic is identical to that which causes caged rats to develop eccentric or even violent mannerisms when they press a bar for sustenance on an aperiodic reinforcement schedule (one where food is delivered at random, but the rat doesn't suspect). Much of the weird behavior school kids display is a function of the aperiodic reinforcement schedule. And the endless confinement and inactivity to slowly drive children out of their minds. Trapped children, like trapped rats, need close management. Any rat psychologist will tell you that."

Thus endeth our reading from the brilliant man -- finally awakened to what he was really being asked to do -- who is conceivably the greatest government-school teacher of our time.

Vin Suprynowicz (vsuprynowicz@review journal. com) is assistant editorial page editor of the Review-Journal, and author of the novel "The Black Arrow." See www.vinsuprynowicz.com.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Leave Your Comment 28 Reader Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Current Word Count:

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

Report abuse

Ron wrote on May 24, 2008 12:06 PM: Speaking from experience (I have helped to home-school my four boys). I can say that Paolo is right on the mark. My children not only excel on their own, but when they mingle with both their peers and other adults as well.

My eldest (now 18) and I recently took a course together and we completed the course in the top 10%. Never has anyone said to us "Wow, your son is an introvert, was he home-schooled?" He is extremely outgoing and everyone loves him as a respectful and self confident young man.

On a personal note, our greatest fear of homeschooling our children was that we would fail them. Looking back now, we had little to worry about because our fear for our children's future was sufficient to motivate us to achieve a greater level of education for them than any teacher (who only sees them for one year) could.

Additionally, we know our children better than anyone else could or can. We know when they are being lazy or truly stumped, therefore we can rectify any minor issues before they become real problems.

This reflects on the free market solution. If you want your kids in state sponsored public school, I am all for your right to do that. But please, don't ask me, as a father who has had to pay for my children's education out of my own pocket while paying my local, state and federal taxes, to pay for your kids schooling out of some sort of obligation that I owe society... I don't. I didn't ask for anyone's help to educate my children (most of our early years we were living below the poverty limit) so please don't tell me that I am now somehow obligated to help now that I earn a comfortable living.


Report abuse

Paolo wrote on May 23, 2008 05:01 PM: All normal parents want what is best for their children, including a good education. This is the way God or nature made us.

Parents do not normally starve their children to save food. They don't normally let them go naked to save money on clothes. In fact, one of the major motivations of getting a better job or starting a new business is to provide for children.

Parents, in a free society, would not normally deprive their children of learning. They would have a tremendous number of choices, just as we do in other aspects of a free market. They could choose Montessori; home-schooling; religious schooling; or even Prussian-modeled, march-around-to-the-sound-of-bells authoritarian education. (This last would likely not do well in a free society.)

You, the parents, would be empowered to choose the education that best reflects your values and your children's best interests.


Report abuse

Robert Walker wrote on May 23, 2008 07:55 AM: I once had the privilege of instructing people in the science of driving an automobile. I was struck by the difference in the learning ability of home-schooled children and those miseducated in the public school system. The home-schooled children were quicker to learn, understood more easily the need to be ever watchful while behind the wheel of an automobile. They were also more polite and respectful. The attention span of the public education student was about a minute, while the home-schooled student paid attention, and learned.


Report abuse

Ron wrote on May 21, 2008 08:19 PM: Jeremiah,

I am sorry for my delay in reply to your question, I have a family and we stay quite busy. I was not attempting to ignore you, and both your comments and questions deserve a well reasoned response (as 300 words will allow for).

First off, your comment about T.J. founding the first public university in Virginia is spot on, but please note that it was funded by T.J., and I assume, anyone else who wanted to see higher education available for more people (as far as I know, all of the early universities in the U.S. were privately funded). But I could be wrong, as I have been before and I am sure that I will be wrong again.

With that said, I do not hang my argument on the founding fathers alone, as I believe my arguments against coercion can stand firmly on their own, and the volume of reason and arguments (present and past) would support freedom over slavery of any type. Mr. Jefferson owned slaves, are we to assume that because he did, it is acceptable? No, of course not, and I am not willing to throw the baby out with the bathwater.


I am running out of space, but the other questions that you had about funding other "needs" were roughly answered (however crudely) by other posters...

Jeremiah, I did not take your concerns to be snide, and I apologize if others have offended you (I kind of felt offended for you myself). at the same time I can empathize with the emotions that others are going through due to the fact that they simply want to be left alone to live their lives, but are instead forced to live their lives (and invest their livelihood) in the schemes and moral legislation of others.


Report abuse

Paolo wrote on May 21, 2008 06:54 PM: Interesting how indoctrination camp supporters describe Vin and Gatto's discussions of education as "anecdotal." Gatto's research is thoroughly footnoted and documented--and factual.

Having taught in both suburban and inner city schools, I can attest that the Prussian education system is working brilliantly at producing obedient, sullen serfs on the one hand, and loud, obnoxious thugs on the other (depending on the particular Prussian role each students takes).

You want to know how our country has been fooled into a pointless foreign adventure based on bald-faced lies, and the "leaders" suffer no consequences? Just like the German leaders in WWII (until reality finally caught up with them and destroyed both them and their once-beautiful country).

It's the Prussian indoctrination system, folks. It's working brilliantly.


Report abuse

Bill Smith wrote on May 21, 2008 05:17 AM: Please stop crying Jeremiah and give a proper response. Are you that thick skinned?


Report abuse

jeremy wrote on May 20, 2008 09:51 PM: Jeremiah,
If you would truly like to know how we as a society could operate without a tax-funded police force, fire department, military, etc, read Constitutional Homeland Security by Edwin Vieira Jr. It's all about the fourth branch of government-the State Militias, which include all American citizens. Militia duty is a requirement of constitutional freeedom. The lawful militias have disappeared and our freedoms right along with them.


Report abuse

Paolo wrote on May 20, 2008 07:43 PM: I have previously made the argument that, if public school is so self-evidently valuable to people, then why not make participation in them voluntary?

The response was (in essence) "because the people are too stupid to act in their own best interest. You have to force them to do so by forced taxation, which we, the enlightened ones, will use to force goodness down their unwilling throats."

But this was not the case in early America, as documented by Alexis de Toqueville, who marveled at the intelligence of the typical American, often unschooled or home-schooled. (See Gatto for more extensive discussion of this.)

Being against public schooling is not the same as being "against learning."

I restate my challenge: if public school is so valuable, why does it has to be instituted by coercion? Answer: because parents in a free society would very, very quickly discover efficient, inexpensive ways to educate their children, freed the burden and false promise of "free" public education.


Report abuse

Jeremiah wrote on May 20, 2008 12:35 PM: Bill,

I appreciate that you want and are free to participate in the discussion. However, my comments were not directed at you. Still, you feel the need to insult me. That I do not appreciate. I have done no wrong to you to deserve that. How can you ever expect to convince anyone that you are correct when the first words you type are filled with such scorn?


Report abuse

Bill Smith wrote on May 20, 2008 11:00 AM: Jeremiah, are you that dense? The first paved roads in America were private. A whole new and much more efficient road system would be born if the free market would be allowed to work. National defense would be even easier with most people being armed. Both Japan and Germany during WWII would have never attacked the mainland USA for this very reason. Tiny Switzerland survived and prospered during WWII with a militia. They attacked both allied and axis aircraft that violated their airspace. Many parts of the country now have all volunteer fire departments. If people were allowed to protect themselves, the police force would shirk to nothing but a few part time constables. This country did not have police forces and somehow survived. Emergency care can and is private as well. People would have to be responsible for themselves and not depend on others. Private charities would take the place of welfare. Would it be perfect? Hell no, but at least we would be free.


Read All Comments