Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

Opinion


FROM OUR READERS: Pulte protest wasn't about unions -- it was about justice

To the editor:

Your Monday editorial, "Worker death camp in the desert" claims that Interfaith Worker Justice is a "union front group." Nothing could be further from the truth. Consider the following:


Most Popular Stories
  • EDITORIAL: A pre-9/11 approach to terror
  • LETTERS: Public-sector workers are still doing well
  • LETTERS: Harry Reid: Working hard for all Americans
  • VIN SUPRYNOWICZ: Barefooted, gun-toting hayseeds?
  • LETTERS: Senator just trying to kiss up to Harry Reid
  • EDITORIAL: 'That's the ticket!'
  • LETTERS: A giant octopus threatens rural Nevada
  • EDITORIAL: The time is right
  • LETTERS: America should try terrorists in open court
  • EDITORIAL: Religious freedom




  • --IWJ's 32-member board of directors includes 24 religious leaders and just four union leaders. These religious leaders include representatives of most of the major national denominations.

    --Just 12 percent of IWJ's funding comes from labor unions (the bulk comes from religious congregations, denominations and orders, foundations and concerned individuals). Contrary to the implication in your editorial, the December 2006 partnership between IWJ and the AFL-CIO allows workers' centers affiliated with IWJ to join local labor councils around the United States but does not involve any financial support.

    --IWJ supports justice for workers through several advocacy and service programs, including a national network of 19 workers' centers that help workers enforce their rights whether or not they belong to unions and advocacy for worker-friendly public policies, such as a higher minimum wage.

    As an independent organization of people of faith motivated first and foremost by concern for the least fortunate among us, we believe that labor unions are an important partner in supporting justice for workers. The laws that supposedly protect workers' rights are weak, and the U.S. Department of Labor is underfunded and understaffed.

    As a result, we are called by our faith to shine the light of public accountability on the practices of Pulte Homes and its subcontractors. We believe that justice in this situation would be best served by Pulte adopting an ethical contracting policy that guarantees workers the right to organize unions so that they can enforce their rights and have a voice in their workplaces.

    Unfortunately, I am not surprised that Pulte Homes has resorted to attacking IWJ rather than responding to our concerns. To date, the company has refused a number of requests for a meeting to discuss the issues we highlight in our report. We would welcome the chance to discuss these concerns and see whether we can develop an approach that balances the company's interests with the rights of its workers.

    The Rev. Phil Tom

    LOUISVILLE, KY.

    The Rev. Bennie E. Whitten Jr.

    CHICAGO

    THE WRITERS SERVE ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF INTERFAITH WORKER JUSTICE.

    Good judge

    To the editor:

    After reading all the comments by attorneys who denigrated Chief District Judge Kathy Hardcastle and the comments of those who held her in esteem, I have come to the following conclusion: She is one who stands tall in a city where law and order doesn't seem to be a priority ("Amid controversies, judge gets low rating," Tuesday Review-Journal).

    How easy it is to put someone down in an evaluation when the accuser cannot be made to back up the statements with proof. "Rude," "conceited," "She has the charm of a crocodile." These accusations, hurled in anonymity, sound like sour grapes from attorneys who perhaps lost their cases.

    To me, the comments by District Judge Stewart Bell hold much more credibility. First, we know from whence they came, a judge who has himself served as both Clark County district attorney and District Court judge. Second, these comments come from one who has received a 91 percent retention rating. Judge Bell says "Kathy takes her responsibility seriously and tries hard to make the courts the best that they can be." Can Clark County taxpayers ask for anything more?

    Judge Hardcastle stood strong for the law and for the proper handling of matters of the court even though she knew that it could damage her image. Give me a judge any day who stands for truth and justice, who doesn't bow to subjective pressure, who wants the law to be followed as it was written.

    Isn't that what all judges are supposed to do? May she continue to serve Clark County for years to come.

    Monica Caffarella

    HENDERSON

    Saving the middle class

    To the editor:

    Your Tuesday editorial, "From each according to his ability ..." mischaracterizes Sen. Barack Obama as a "socialist" while disparaging the majority of hard-working citizens in Nevada and across America.

    The infrastructure of America is dependent on a solid middle class. Social Security depends on the taxes raised from the sweat of the middle class, not from the taxes of rich corporate magnates. How many hard-working Nevadans have helped to make people such as Steve Wynn and Sheldon Adelson richer? How many of these same hard-working people are now facing foreclosure?

    The editorial implies that the only hard-working people in the United States are those who are wealthy, many of whom are corporate magnates who have contributed to the erosion of the middle class by relocating jobs overseas and lobbying against health care reform.

    People who were once living a solidly middle-class lifestyle have slipped or are on the verge of slipping into the lower class because their jobs have been sent overseas and they are struggling to meet the daily cost of living.

    What is America going to do when there is no more middle class to keep it balanced? What is America going to do when there are just two classes of citizens: the rich and the poor?

    Andrea Kato

    LAS VEGAS

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 19 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Whateverusaydear wrote on May 25, 2008 02:34 PM: Steve,

    I respect your right to your own opinion, but don't you think the "all American products" jacket you have is a bit extreme?

    American produce is inferior to foreign produce? Heparin from China is superior? Lead in toys produced in a foreign country is superior to toys manufactured in the U.S.? Toothpaste with antifreeze ingredients - superior to American products?

    Having illegal workers of unknown quality is somehow superior to licensed, certified workers in America?

    No one has to buy American; that's our right.


    Are you? wrote on May 25, 2008 02:26 PM: Monica, are you one of the ones Kathy has "drinks" with????????


    TimeRanger wrote on May 25, 2008 02:06 PM: I am still trying to figure out why the IWJ is targeting Pulte - They are the general contractor not the subs that are supposedly "guilty" of mistreating their hired help. Why not just target the home buyers since without their demand, Pulte wouldn't be in business


    Steve wrote on May 25, 2008 12:54 PM: I'd rather not buy American products because they are made by overpaid, underworked, unskilled union employees who are only concerned with paying their union dues. The products they make are so inferior they are useless because they know they can't be fired even if they shoot the Pope on national TV. Union = inferior!


    Whateverusaydear wrote on May 25, 2008 12:15 PM: Jake,

    I think we're all aware that U.S. businesses have these disadvantages and more (like other countries don't have to worry about padding profits by adulterating products being sold in the U.S.).

    I'm wondering WHY our taxed/regulated businesses can't get help and support.

    Of COURSE we're overtaxed and regulated... but our leaders can offer meaningful INCENTIVES to help our domestic businesses, can they not? I would much rather see our businesses in the Midwest and the East thrive instead of foreign businesses, given our economic climate.

    Buying American wouldn't hurt either!

    What stops Americans DEMANDING action in order to help our own businesses get reestablished in our cities, and bring our jobs back home?

    And take a page out of Arizona's book... punish those who profit from using illegal immigrant labor. And if you're a consumer, stop picking up illegal day laborers from the street to do your dirty work.

    Never mind those 3 choices: make a fourth choice by helping our American businesses and penalize those using the illegal labor.


    curly wrote on May 25, 2008 12:10 PM: i live in a apt in Henderson and most people don't complain because there are illegals and don't speak English..so i'm one of the few who complain...


    Jake wrote on May 25, 2008 11:05 AM: Whateverusaydear wrote on May 25, 2008 10:45 AM: ... instead of breaks for overseas investment, why can't businesses in our own country get help and support in some of our great depressed cities in the Rust Belt instead?""

    Because they are TAXED AND REGULATED so much that it comes down to two choices. Leave the U.S. or go out of business.

    Well there is a third, hire ILLEGALS so they can cut costs, such as health care and retirement.


    BOB wrote on May 25, 2008 10:55 AM: IWJ = "ILLEGAL WORKERS JUSTICE"

    Dear so called Rev's, if the workers you represent would have followed OUR LAWS and came to the U.S. LEGALY, they would be able to complain on their own.

    Why do you think big business does not want the boarder closed?
    THEY WANT THIER SLAVE LABOR! They know "ILLEAGAL" means that the slaves will not complain for fear of being sent home.

    Our politicians answer to this? Grant AMNESTY, so business will have to import a new batch of "ILLEAGALS" to take the place of the old ones and then drive the wages down even more.

    Your falling right into their plan, LOWER WAGES = MORE PROFIT = MORE CAMPAIGN DOLLARS = NO JAIL TIME FOR HIRRING ILLEAGAL WORKERS. Get a clue, then come back after you learn something.


    Whateverusaydear wrote on May 25, 2008 10:45 AM: I agree 100% with Brock Davis about buying American (USA), and I add that when I shop for produce I look for "produce of USA" on the packaging. In spite of the American-sounding product name, if it doesn't specifically state "produce of USA" then I treat it as if the producers are hiding something and go on to something else that IS labeled USA.

    I learned early on that "flag" or patriotic imagery on the package doesn't mean anything. I once considered some tomatoes with nice American labeling/imagery on it but it didn't say where it was from... I politely asked the produce clerk who checked what the produce came in and he told me Sinaloa (so I didn't buy it).

    As far as China products, I bailed on those long ago when American consumers were suffering... I'm not waiting for FDA or any government entity to do something about it. Even in a 99-cent store it's easy enough to see if a product were made in, say, Mexico or China, and choose products that were made in the USA.

    Because of the increased reliability of American cars, my last 2 vehicle purchased were predominantly American products (GM/Ford)... those were conscious choices to support American products.

    What I'm trying now is to avoid businesses that blatently don't use American labor.

    Will buying American products be more costly? Probably. I'd rather see a little more money spent at home stay at home. I also don't want to be a guinea pig for less-than-safe products from a foreign country.

    I'd like to see our great cities come back... instead of breaks for overseas investment, why can't businesses in our own country get help and support in some of our great depressed cities in the Rust Belt instead?


    Tom, Burbank wrote on May 25, 2008 10:26 AM: The good reverends should stick to religion and stay out of poilitics, lest the IRS (hint, hint) look into their finances.


    Read All Comments