Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

Opinion


EDITORIAL: Insurance mandates

Nothing gets a politician's hands wringing more quickly than talk about health care costs. Oh, how lawmakers lament the plight of those who can't afford health insurance, even if it's subsidized by their employer. Especially during election season, incumbents and challengers alike promise to bring forward proposals that, they assure us, will make it cheaper for everyone to seek medical treatment.

Then, of course, they force mandate upon mandate upon insurers, create new regulations for physicians, pharmacists and hospitals and shove the snout of government farther into every facet of the marketplace, driving up costs with every reactive snort and squeal.


Most Popular Stories
  • EDITORIAL: Terrorism on trial
  • EDITORIAL: A pre-9/11 approach to terror
  • SHERMAN FREDERICK: Call evil by its rightful name
  • LETTERS: Public-sector workers are still doing well
  • LETTERS: Harry Reid: Working hard for all Americans
  • VIN SUPRYNOWICZ: What stops mass murderers? A gun
  • EDITORIAL: 'That's the ticket!'
  • Our politicians are the greatest, all right
  • LETTERS: A giant octopus threatens rural Nevada
  • LETTERS: America should try terrorists in open court




  • Just last year, even as Democrats in the Nevada Legislature vowed to emphasize affordability in reforming the state health care industry, lawmakers ordered insurers to cover prostate cancer screenings for men and cervical cancer vaccines for women, and tried to force citizens suffering from colds to obtain prescriptions for common cold remedies.

    How, exactly, were these laws supposed to make health care cheaper? The cancer mandates alone compel Nevada insurers to cover millions of dollars in new claims each year, which will be passed along to policy holders through increased premiums and co-pays.

    One state appears to have the right idea regarding cost-reducing reforms. Florida Gov. Charlie Crist persuaded his state's legislature to take the opposite approach and allow insurers to offer bare-bones, catastrophic coverage exempt from more than 50 state mandates. By next year, Floridians who don't need coverage for acupuncture, chiropractics, homeopathy and other special-interest frills will be able to purchase these plans for close to $100 per month.

    This is what is derisively known among the left as a "market-based solution" to providing health coverage to the uninsured. As The Wall Street Journal noted in a Thursday editorial in support of Gov. Crist's legislation: "When prices rise because of mandates, the less affluent are often forced to make an all-or-nothing choice between 'Cadillac coverage,' which involves just about everything, or going uninsured. In other words, they're prohibited from buying the low-cost options that might be better suited to their needs."

    Despite this reality, Democrats continually push expansions in public health programs toward "universal" utopia. And every year, health care costs grow faster than the rate of inflation.

    About a dozen other states are liberating insurers from mandates and allowing them to offer stripped-down coverage at significantly lower prices, either on a permanent or probationary basis. They make perfect sense because it's not the $35 pharmacy expense or the $120 bill for a doctor's visit that destroys an uninsured household's finances -- it's getting stuck with a $10,000 bill for an emergency room visit.

    Next year, the Legislature should crib Gov. Crist's idea and give the free market a chance to meet a demand that they clearly can't.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 4 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    douglas wrote on June 01, 2008 11:31 PM: if you like the gubmit run postal service and dmv, then you'll love gubmit run [read, doled out], health care. first in line of course would hapless harry reid's "pre-citizens". gramps [who paid into all systems since income tax started] will just have to take a number and wait on the mile long bench... with his chest pains.

    coolest joke this week was uttered by the congress-person, ms waters [the one who fought with/assaulted guards at a secured entrance to congress because they didn't recognize her and asked for i.d.]. she said that the oil industry should be "nationalized". what's the over-under number/cost to the consumer per gallon of pump gas were the gubmit to "manage" the drilling, transportation, refining, and retailing that gas ? $5 ? $7 ? $10 ? more ?


    the HSA king wrote on June 01, 2008 11:54 AM: Finally, a common sense editorial that directly addresses the root cause of soaring health care costs--governmental intervention.

    Our Las Vegas based agency specializes in low cost high deductible health plans that qualify for health savings accounts.
    http://www.hsahealthplans.com


    tim wrote on June 01, 2008 10:17 AM: the gov.will save us all if we would just listen to them.ha ha ha!


    Helen Weils wrote on June 01, 2008 07:46 AM: I've been in Florida since January and
    Charlie Christ is well loved on both sides of the fence. He would make a great Vice President.