Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - Opinion

Thursday
Mar 18, 2010
Clouds And Sun
Clouds And Sun 71° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu

Opinion


EDITORIAL: Too fat to die

The death penalty is not funny.

When the state uses its ultimate power to deprive someone of life itself, it had better be sure of the justness of its cause.


Most Popular Stories
  1. Judging a judge
  2. Open ... and shut
  3. A lottery would raise money for education
  4. Only the private sector can create wealth
  5. Net neutrality
  6. Open court



But there has been no rush for revenge in the case of Richard Cooey, who sits on Ohio's death row, awaiting execution on Oct. 14 for raping and murdering two women in 1986.

That's right -- 22 years ago.

Nothing about that should be amusing.

But it's convicts such as Cooey -- and anti-death penalty advocates and attorneys who help and encourage them to pursue the most absurd procedural appeals -- who threaten to turn justice into a joke.

Cooey has not exactly wasted away with remorse for his misdeeds. At 41 years of age, he stands 5 feet 7 inches tall and has enjoyed his prison diet well enough to balloon up to 267 pounds. He's so obese that prison officials have had trouble drawing blood from his veins for medical procedures.

Yes, you've guessed it. Cooey's tax-paid lawyers have hired a physician to file legal papers pleading with the court that Cooey's weight, coupled with a drug he's taking for migraine headaches, increases the risk that an anaesthetic he'll be given just prior to his execution by lethal injection won't work properly.

The defense argues Richard Cooey is too fat to be put to death.

It's been 22 years. His victims could have been grandmothers by now, if Cooey had not snuffed out their lives. How can a debt be paid to their children never born? Through this kind of mockery of the earnest attempt of the people of Ohio to spare such a man even a few moments of pain?

One longs for a judge courageous enough to cut through the malarkey and order, "OK, give the man what he's asking for. Forget about the lethal injection. Just take him out tomorrow and shoot him."

That's not likely to happen, of course. Instead, the courts will invite more mockeries like this appeal.

Actually, if sentencing a convict to "death" means the taxpayers have to support him in prison for two decades and counting, our judges might want to consider instituting "the Richard Cooey sentence," as an alternative.

Lock up these killers and subject them to a diet of nothing but mashed potatoes and gravy.

Chances are they'll die of heart failure in less than 22 years.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Leave Your Comment 26 Reader Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Current Word Count:

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

Report abuse

GL wrote on August 25, 2008 12:23 PM: I know, how about we blow this rhino's head off with an elephant gun?


Report abuse

dbs wrote on August 10, 2008 02:44 PM: Better even than my first comment - I agree they should bring back chain gangs, or at least put them to some physical use to give them useful purpose and to help repay the taxpayer for their care. OR WOULD THAT BE CRUEL AND INHUMANE?? such crap!


Report abuse

dbs wrote on August 10, 2008 02:42 PM: why are we feeding him so much, if he is in prision. How about a diet for a year or so. THEN!! bye


Report abuse

Dave wrote on August 08, 2008 04:50 AM: Mr. Cooey could be administered a nice surgical intervention to a vein quite adequate for the administration of justice. I am of the opinion that in the end his mockery of justice will be terminated with the inevitable consequences of extreme due process. He will go the way of so many of his predecessors, milking the system for every moment he can until he's out of options.


Report abuse

Gordon Martines wrote on August 07, 2008 08:15 PM: I read all of the comments posted and noticed a lot of emotion and deep seated feelings regarding the death penalty. I for one am in favor of the death penalty and life imprisonment w/o parole. We live in a imperfect world and our system of justice is not perfect by all means, but im my opinion it is the best in the world. Go visit another country and see how you like it. It is just too bad that 5.7% of our population (criminals) take advantage of our system of justice, and attempt to manipulate, convolute, and corrupt our legal system. I am in agreement with most of your posts, I only wish that I was smart enough to come up with a better solution. The only solution that I can think of is to follow the "EXISTING LAW" and not be distracted by frivolous lawyer tactics and Political Confidence Games and Lies. It makes me want to vomit when I hear the powers to be are thinking about closing a atate prison and letting go the trash inside back into our communities, sweet jesus what are they thinking? Everyone stay safe.


Report abuse

Steve wrote on August 07, 2008 05:53 PM: John F,

My personal opinion, but the reason the death penalty doesn't act as a deterrent is because it isn't put to conclusion quickly enough. People sentenced to death living on death row for 20, 30, 40, 50 years will never be a deterrent. Taking them straight to the death chamber within 15 minutes of being sentenced will, in my opinion, be a great deterrent.


Report abuse

james wrote on August 07, 2008 05:39 PM: It's lawyers like these that bring back the old joke which holds some truth. "what do you call five thousand lawyers at the bottom of the sea? A damm good start."
and too think we as taxpayers pay these low life lawyers to take on these this wasteful cases.. let the over weight die because his victim paid the price.


Report abuse

Shannon wrote on August 07, 2008 10:25 AM: Oh my goodness, will wonders never cease...I agree with Helen.

And, Helen, thank you for a comment that actually has some substance without attacking others. I appreciate it.


Report abuse

John F wrote on August 07, 2008 09:43 AM: wildbill,

Race is an issue in how the death penalty is administered, and not saying so won't make it any less so. So is the defendant's income, the state in which (s)he lives, and his/her gender. The numbers don't lie.

Helen and I actually agree on something. There must be a snowball fight in h*** today.


Report abuse

kdr81 wrote on August 07, 2008 09:14 AM: End the death penalty but bring back the chain gang.


Read All Comments