Home subscribe manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

Opinion


LETTERS: The hunt for energy savings, chance to feel smug

FROM OUR READERS

To the editor:

Yesterday I had to run a few errands but was short on fuel, so I first stopped at the corner gas station and put more air in my tires.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Most Popular Stories
  • LETTERS: Professor needs to get with the program
  • LETTERS: Washington loves rewarding failure
  • FROM OUR READERS: We can't do worse than country's current leadership
  • LETTERS: Trickle-down economics is dead
  • EDITORIAL: Tip jar
  • VIN SUPRYNOWICZ: Shall we save the economy ... or the government?
  • LETTERS: Don't expect district to cut waste
  • EDITORIAL: Sending the right message
  • EDITORIAL: A tiny bit of good news?
  • EDITORIAL: 'A cautionary tale'



  • I drove to Wal-Mart, but before going in I thought about all those little colorful envelopes with messages inside telling me about the "evil" retail giant. I went in anyway to buy bandages and light bulbs.

    I checked the label on the box of Band-Aids, and there was no lead in them, so I felt safer. Then I looked through the light bulbs, when I remembered Al Gore saying that we need to buy those "energy-efficient" bulbs, and if we do Earth won't die. Sanity returned before I bought anything, and I drove to another store, where I bought said items (spending about $4 more). It was worth the price to feel smug about saving the planet and defeating the "evil" store.

    On the way home, I felt the car engine chug a few times, then it stopped running. I was lucky enough to coast into another gas station, where I put more air in my tires, but the darn car still wouldn't start.

    What's going on here? "The One The World is Waiting For" told me to put more air in my tires, and I wouldn't have to depend on foreign oil!

    Oh, the injustice of it all. I walked back home and had a beer, thinking, "Damn these lying politicians."

    John Campbell

    LAS VEGAS

    Hot air

    To the editor:

    Wednesday's editorial, "Obama's energy policy," and Jim Day's Wednesday cartoon took shots at presidential candidate Barack Obama's suggestion concerning the proper inflation of automobile tires.

    According to the U.S. Department of Energy, every pound per square inch of under-inflation has the potential to waste 4 million gallons of oil a day in this country. Assuming about 25 percent of tires are under-inflated means a saving of about 1 million gallons a day, or 365 million gallons a year.

    These savings are real and realizable. Sen. Obama was on the mark, but your editorial and cartoon were not.

    Irwin Kaufman

    LAS VEGAS

    No discipline

    To the editor:

    Dr. Larry Tarno, top administrator of the Nevada State Board of Osteopathic Medicine, has the audacity to say to the public that careless Dr. Scott Young should not face any serious disciplinary actions even though he reused syringes and vials on multiple patients ("Doctor licensing board not recommending sanctions," July 30 Review-Journal).

    Dr. Tarno goes on to say that Dr. Young's "peers are very comfortable working with him." Unsafe injection practices were witnessed, yet this doctor's peers want the guy to continue practicing medicine? Let him practice on them.

    What is it going to take to have the medical profession in this state straighten up and practice good medicine? It is a no-brainer. Dr. Young should be stripped of his license, and his peers should stand up and cheer rather than say they're "very comfortable working with him." These doctors who have the mighty "me" complex and demeanor of Dr. Young and who chose to infect patients with a fatal disease should all be tossed out of the medical profession.

    I've worked in and around the health field for more than 20 years, and I am totally disgusted with the slipshod medicine practiced by many so-called professionals here.

    With open and transparent information on the medical profession, the good, expert, honest practitioners would remain in Nevada, and the bad ones would be culled out, which would not be loss to the prospective patient.

    BRADLEY KUHNS

    LAS VEGAS

    HOAs and foreclosures

    To the editor:

    The article "Subcommittee targets housing sector" in Tuesday's Review-Journal Business section provides some insight into what may be proposed by the 2009 Nevada Legislature to protect homeowners and renters from predatory lending, renting and sales practices. Unfortunately, some proposals are misguided, absent or not well-thought-out.

    First and foremost is the absence of a "speculator beware" proposal. Today, a housing speculator with one or more mortgages underwater (and we all thought this would be hard to do here in a desert) can simply walk away with only a credit blemish. If a U.S. military veteran with a VA home loan tried this, even after filing bankruptcy, he would still carry the loan deficit obligation. So should everyone else -- especially speculators. This may cause some people to think twice about blatant speculation or lying on a loan application.

    There are thousands of homeowner associations in Nevada. Those who somehow believe that NRS116 and their homeowner association's Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions offer protection from the loss of monthly dues income and protection from housing blight need to rethink their position. As I understand it, in a foreclosure here, the mortgage holder is only obligated for up to six months of unpaid homeowner association dues. If the prior owner was in arrears more than six months, then the association most likely eats it, and the revenue is lost. If this involved back taxes and not HOA dues, those taxes would have been collected.

    Any homeowner association fines assessed against the foreclosed homeowner simply evaporate. If those fines were because the homeowner had let the property deteriorate, then the HOA receives no funds to restore the property. For the HOA, the problem is exacerbated if it had been in a position to actually make the required exterior repairs and then assess the homeowner the cost. That investment is also lost to the HOA in the foreclosure.

    After foreclosure, restoration becomes the responsibility of the mortgage holder. Rarely is this done. The property is eventually sold as-is and at a price that reflects the overall deteriorated condition, thereby further negatively impacting the property values of the entire community.

    Good luck trying to contact the mortgage holder about maintaining his property after a foreclosure. By the time the grass dies, the pool turns green, the property is vandalized and the homeowner association's letters are "returned to sender" or not returned at all, months have elapsed. Sure, maybe the homeowner association's CC&Rs list the right to fine the new owner and the mortgage holder for disregarding the CC&Rs, but so what? Where is that new owner? Where does he live?

    Don't forget, buried in most CC&Rs, the owner is first entitled to a formal deficiency notice and then a hearing before the homeowner association's board before he is asked to pay a fine. None of this will ever happen.

    One of the primary objectives of a homeowner association is to maintain the common property and joint homeowner interests such that home values are preserved and enhanced. HOAs here need new laws so that these objectives can be properly maintained.

    Let's keep these objectives in mind in 2009. Hey, why wait until 2009 -- the sooner the better.

    Richard Rychtarik

    LAS VEGAS

    Halverson hearing

    To the editor:

    District Judge Elizabeth Halverson in an insult to the intelligence of the voters ("Judicial hearing proceeds," Thursday Review-Journal).

    Judge Halverson was more than willing to collect her $130,000 salary while feeding at the public trough for one year and contributing nothing to earn that. Her retention rating from the legal profession, according to the Review-Journal, was 8 percent, the lowest of all judges.

    Her attorney, Michael Schwartz, conveniently circumvents the basic issue, and that is the alleged incompetence that got her removed from the bench.

    In addition, Judge Halverson's extreme obesity has a potential future cost to the taxpayers in the event that she is physically incapable of continuing as a judge.

    It is strongly advised that the Judicial Discipline Commission take immediate action to remove Judge Halverson permanently from the bench and terminate her salary. The voters deserve better representation.

    Geret N. Kritzer

    LAS VEGAS



    Leave Your Comment 61 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Travis wrote on August 09, 2008 10:58 PM: "usually when a debater has no facts"

    I used facts, read back about the percent of federal budget. You won't debate that though because it's easier to ignore something when you are wrong than to admit it.

    "what happened to the issue of the "progressive" regime continually forcing u.s. consumers to send money offshore for energy"

    What about the oil industry withholding supply? This is why the dems tried requiring them to drill on their existing leases. The less they drill, the more we have to buy from overseas. They are the culprit, but Fox will never tell you the truth. They are supported by them as well, as the Republican party has been for years. Get your head out of your rear end.

    "what's cool is that there are citizens with such a low caliber intellect that they actually believe that pumping up the tires and teaching the kids to shiver is going to create u.s. energy independence."

    Pumping up tires will decrease demand, not create energy independence as your strawman argument concludes. You do know about supply and demand, right. If not, I can educate you.

    Creating energy independence will require an increase in supply and decrease in demand. Unfortunately, your simple mind can't handle more than one thought at a time.

    There hasn't been a single fact in any of your posts today, just opinion and right-wing talking points. As I stated earlier, I pity you. You have been given a brain, but a spinal chord would suffice. Use the mass between your ears for something other than remembering the talking points Hannity gives you. Do some critical thinking, for once, so that you don't have to rely on others for your thoughts.


    douglas wrote on August 09, 2008 10:44 PM: "illogical" ? the response is simply to those childish accusations. usually when a debater has no facts, or even some party slogan that he believes, the dolt resorts to personal attacks. it's kinda like a child caught in a lie. when exposed the child spins the yarn.

    what happened to the issue of the "progressive" regime continually forcing u.s. consumers to send money offshore for energy ? what's cool is that there are citizens with such a low caliber intellect that they actually believe that pumping up the tires and teaching the kids to shiver is going to create u.s. energy independence.

    one might notice that lately the leftist/"progressive" apparat is now spinning toward "some" drilling for u.s. oil. that's a start. when they come down from their drug highs and begin an aggressive program to use nuclear, coal, oil shale, solar, and wind, the u.s. will being importing less energy. could be that someday the u.s. will again export energy. but that's impossible under the "progressive" regime.

    meanwhile, the "change" to the promised "$10-$12 a gallon" pump gas, plus the "progressive" proposed, federal energy tax surcharge should pretty much bankrupt the u.s. and the [legal] citizens.

    thanks, harry osama reid.


    Travis wrote on August 09, 2008 09:58 PM: douglas, your post was one of the most illogical collections of random thoughts and memories I have ever read. Maybe the men in white coats need to pay you another visit. Wait, shouldn't you be on the strip shouting strange things at the tourists? Whatever the case, look up "Psychiatrist" in the phone book and call one of them. They might be the only ones who can help you.


    douglas wrote on August 09, 2008 09:52 PM: since i also comment on message boards frequented by the "sovereign citizen" lads, they understand "gubmit". leastwise that's the way they often talk what with their remaining teeth when i see them in person.

    as to snow, the most i've had in the driveway was a few years back... 13 feet. after the 6th avalanche that afternoon, lv metro called for a mandatory evacuation. that midnight walk-out with a flashlight, down to the search and rescue point was invigorating. clark county residents may recall that a young man was swept off a chair lift at the lee canyon ski facility. despite hundreds of volunteers and rescue staff, he wasn't found and dug out in time.

    as to listening to any radio or watching tv, via an internet connection, that seems to suck up too much bandwidth. not worth the continual "buffering". news is much better on many of the world's newspaper sites. one site links to about 3000 newspaper websites. were the usual leftist stooges to peruse the couple of [in english], mainland chinese or al jazeera sites, they might notice a similarity to the u.s. "mainstream" "news" media. a good example was the reporting of unbiased, on site reporters during the paris riots by the north african "immigrants". the number of cars and property destroyed were greatly understated in u.s. "mainstream" media.

    as to the u.p. guess i've been there a few times. better "pasties" though are made in a milwaukee pasty shop. those they sell to tourists in the upper peninsula are like hockey pucks. and since icelandic airlines was for years, the only non-"iata" [read, fixed priced, everybody's the same], trans-atlantic airline, guess i've been there as well. only about a dozen times though, enroute to their european hub, luxembourg city. iceland unlike the u.s., uses their available energy sources.


    Travis wrote on August 09, 2008 09:37 PM: I have a prediction. The "non-socialist" common sense will be back tomorrow stating that he's debunked all of the claims of those who don't agree with him. Actions always speak louder than words.


    Sean Hannity's Number One Fan! "Psychotic'Gubmint douglas" wrote on August 09, 2008 09:10 PM: "douglas" is Fair and Balanced, and has taken over the Unibomber shack.


    Okay, "Gubmit douglas" is Psychotic; or nearly so wrote on August 09, 2008 08:59 PM: I write this in complete sincerity:

    I am troubled by "douglas'" rambling responses and his continued use of the term "gubmit" to refer to the government, in a private logic that only makes sense to him.

    "douglas" rambles and talks about heavy snowfall where he claims to live.

    For all we know, "douglas" lives in Northern Michigan, or Iceland.

    But "douglas" is lying and knows the AM radio and the Fair and Balanced Fox "News" Channel personailities are available via cable, all over the globe. So is short wave radio, in case "gubmit douglas" resides in Antarctica.


    Travis wrote on August 09, 2008 08:42 PM: The Obama is a muslim claim has to be the funniest one ever. It was hilarious to see how some still believed it while they were railing against him for his Christian priest (Wright). Stupid little lemmings...


    Travis wrote on August 09, 2008 08:36 PM: douglas, I hate to call names, but you are a lemming. Do you think for one second that those who received those government contracts are not politically connected? Do you truly believe that it's not just favors being handed back and forth? Ever wonder why big corporations get bailed out while smaller ones are allowed to fail? Ever question the fascism you so faithfully follow?

    Your first point about percentage of spending is another non-fact based claim. Being that you didn't provide any numbers, what proof do you have. I'll give you a few to think of. In 2006, we spent $515 billion on our military. That was more than the sum of the next 16 countries who spent the most on their military. Next, when you include veterans benefits and the war in Iraq, it is projected that 51% of the federal budget will be military.

    Your last comment is just plain ignorant. Nobody mentioned anything about illegals, I was talking about contractors in Iraq building sub-par facilities for our troops. Additionally, there is nothing accidental about sub-par contracting. It is willful and greedy. You do support our troops, don't you. If so, then you should be equally outraged. You'll find some excuse though, like blaming it on illegals.

    I have one suggestion; watch at least two news channels (not just Fixed, er ah Fox News). Don't get your information from one source. That is how lemmings like yourself continue to be misled. I feel pity for you. I bet they could convince you that Obama is a muslim. Oh wait, they already did that.


    douglas wrote on August 09, 2008 08:06 PM: instead of just spin, the poster might google to see where the vast majority of tax collections go. it's not for military, it's by far, to gubmit "entitlement" programs. get back to us when you get up to speed with the percentages.

    as to any gubmit sub contractor or supplier, if a citizen thinks that there's too much money in any deal, all they have to do is submit some bids. like if you are qualified to make toilet seats, get your bid in. if you can build jet aircraft, get your bid in. if you can supply tanks and ammo, get your bid in. otherwise, let those who have the infrastructure, talent, and equipment fulfill the contracts you apparently can't.

    as to "campaign contributions" that record was set by the clintons siphoning money from mainland china. mysteriously soon thereafter, our missile technology was "released" to the chinese. likely those "campaign contributions" were a whole lot cheaper than doing the years of research on their own. and check the contributions from certain middle eastern countries to the "jimmy carter" library. one might notice that subsequent trips to carter obviously favor the palestinian terrorist organizations. how cheap some of these politicians work, of course to the detriment of u.s. security.

    apparently you listen to those radio commentators. it's said that they have a large listener audience. no doubt they appreciate your listenership. without some sophisticated roof top antennae, i wouldn't be able to receive am radio reception in this village. and it's not wise to penetrate a roof membrane with such hardware, particularly in an area than may enjoy a dozen or more feet of snow accumulation.

    let the readers know what you learn from your radio sources.

    as to accidental deaths, guess i'd start by removing the millions of uninsured, unlicensed illegal infiltrators.


    Read All Comments