Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon

Opinion


BOOZE-RUNNING USED TO BE A FELONY, TOO: Cindy McCain in same business as Greg Gibson

Yet she makes millions, while he does time

What's the reward for peddling a little stress relief? If you're the wife of a presidential candidate with her hand in the beer trade, it can mean tens of millions of dollars. But if you're just a guy who peddles the wrong buzz-delivery system, it can be years of hard time.

Hensley & Co. deals in a once-illegal intoxicant that is now enjoyed by millions of Americans. As the third-largest Anheuser-Busch wholesaler in the United States, Hensley & Co. has made company Chairwoman Cindy McCain, Sen. John McCain's wife, wealthy to the tune of about $100 million.


Most Popular Stories
  • EDITORIAL: Stood her ground
  • LETTERS: A moral obligation to not bankrupt the country
  • VIN SUPRYNOWICZ: 'Allowed' to carry for self-defense
  • LETTERS: Nursery did the right thing with laborers
  • EDITORIAL: Numbers stink?
  • LETTERS: Teachers not most important learning variable
  • LETTERS: Agassi remains a good citizen
  • EDITORIAL: Clunk, clunk
  • LETTERS: Put aside re-election interests for nation's good
  • EDITORIAL: Gotta have faith




  • Gregory Alan Gibson allegedly spent a couple of years transporting shipments of a popular intoxicant around the United States, but not in one of Cindy McCain's trucks. Instead, he was paid a few grand at a time to drive shipments of an intoxicant that's still illegal: marijuana.

    Cindy McCain may get deluxe quarters in the White House as a partial reward for her efforts. For his trouble, Greg Gibson has already spent years in less-splendid quarters at the Great Plains Correctional Facility, a privately run prison that houses many of Arizona's convicted lawbreakers far from home in Hinton, Okla. And a life of financial ruin along with the status of a convicted felon awaits him upon his release.

    On March 25, 2003, Gibson was sentenced to concurrent prison terms resulting in 10 years behind bars, and fined $150,000 for each of twelve counts, plus surcharges of 60 percent.

    Gibson was convicted of illegally conducting an enterprise, conspiracy and 12 counts of transfer for sale, sale or transfer of marijuana.

    There's not a crime against property in the lot -- let alone an act of violence.

    By contrast, when Clifton Bennett, the 18-year-old son of then Arizona state Senate President Ken Bennett, pleaded guilty in 2006 to assaulting 18 boys, he received a lenient 30 days in jail and three years probation.

    Even serious criminals without connections get less severe sentences than Gibson did for transporting marijuana. In May of this year, Jonathan David Alldredge received 41/2 years in prison for shooting a man to death outside a diner in Lake Havasu City.

    And Nicholas David Torres was sentenced to 31/2 years in prison plus five years of probation for beating an elderly man with a baseball bat.

    Felipe Mazo received one year for killing a woman in a hit-and-run car accident.

    The disparity between sentences handed down for crimes of violence and non-violent drug offenses isn't confined to Gibson's case. In "Arizona Prison Crisis: A Call for Smart on Crime Solutions," a report prepared in 2004 for Families Against Mandatory Minimums, Judith Greene and Kevin Pranis point out that Arizona has the highest incarceration rate in the western U.S. and the ninth highest rate in the country.

    According to Greene and Pranis, "Arizona's high incarceration rate is driven by a rigid mandatory sentencing system that severely restricts judges' discretion in imposing sentences and crowds prisons with non-violent substance abusers."

    A majority of Arizona's prisoners, they write, are nonviolent offenders, with one in five behind bars for drug offenses.

    In fact, say Greene and Pranis, in Arizona "[T]he average sentence imposed for drug sales (4.3 years, including marijuana sales), was longer than the average sentence imposed for assault (four years) or weapons charges (3.8 years) and the same as the average sentence for arson."

    Although a first-time offender, Greg Gibson won't be eligible for release until 2011. That's because Arizona's "truth-in-sentencing" statute mandates that prisoners serve at least 85 percent of their sentences.

    Say Greene and Pranis, "Since the law was implemented in 1994, the average time served for non-violent offenses has increased far faster than the time served by violent and other serious person offenders."

    It wasn't supposed to be this way. In 1996, Arizona voters passed a ballot initiative mandating that nonviolent drug offenders arrested for simple possession or use of an illegal drug be sent to drug treatment instead of prison for their first and second offenses.

    But the measure only applied to use and possession. Once a commercial aspect enters the picture, Draconian sentences are mandatory.

    Greg Gibson is no angel. According to prosecutors, he fled custody at one point and tried to bribe the bail bondsman sent to retrieve him.

    But if Gibson isn't an angel, he's not a devil, either. He didn't kill anybody, nor did he molest a child, or assault an old man, and it's hard to see why he should face penalties more harsh than those given to people who did.

    It's hard to justify punishing Greg Gibson at all for dealing in the means to get a buzz when Cindy McCain is rewarded so richly for doing pretty much the same thing -- and on a much larger scale.

    J.D. Tuccille, of Cornville, Ariz., is the former editor of a popular civil libertarian Web site, and now blogs about civil liberties issues for Examiner.com. His columns have appeared in The Arizona Republic, The Denver Post, The Providence Journal and The Washington Times.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 22 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    carol tadmor wrote on September 03, 2008 02:08 PM: The fact that the author of this article would stoop to compare Mrs. McCain and Greg Gibson reeks of the type of biased reporting that has made me stop subscribing to this newspaper as have many of my friends and neighbors. This journalist seems to have forgotten that there is one HUGE difference in the two to begin with. The sale and consumption of alcohol is LEGAL in the country, and the sale, trafficing, transport and use of marijuana is ILLEGAL in this country. Mr. Gibson certainly knew what he was getting into when he agreed to transport illegal drugs, so he should also take responsibility for his actions. This author's reasoning is what's wrong with our society today, and comparing these two people, as if there were any, is absurd.


    Report abuse

    Keeping Track of Wives and Number of Houses Owned wrote on September 02, 2008 09:41 PM: McCain Divorce Account Contradicts Court Documents

    LA Times | July 11, 2008 08:53 AM

    McCain, who is about to become the GOP nominee, has made several statements about how he divorced Carol and married Hensley that conflict with the public record.

    In his 2002 memoir, "Worth the Fighting For," McCain wrote that he had separated from Carol before he began dating Hensley.

    "I spent as much time with Cindy in Washington and Arizona as our jobs would allow," McCain wrote. "I was separated from Carol, but our divorce would not become final until February of 1980."

    An examination of court documents tells a different story. McCain did not sue his wife for divorce until Feb. 19, 1980, and he wrote in his court petition that he and his wife had "cohabited" until Jan. 7 of that year -- or for the first nine months of his relationship with Hensley.

    Although McCain suggested in his autobiography that months passed between his divorce and remarriage, the divorce was granted April 2, 1980, and he wed Hensley in a private ceremony five weeks later. McCain obtained an Arizona marriage license on March 6, 1980, while still legally married to his first wife.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/11/mccain-divorce-account-co_n_112096.html


    Report abuse

    The Intent of the Piece wrote on September 02, 2008 09:36 PM: The R-J is not picking on McCain's second wife.

    The point being that two people sell intoxicants, one legal, and the other illegal, made arbitrarily illegal by a ridiculous war on drugs.


    Report abuse

    Sad Summerlin wrote on September 02, 2008 05:11 PM: Jen -

    They still don't have enough energy to steal the "twinkies"... they prepare before lighting the bowl with significant snack foods, classic movies and plenty of cushions and pillows nearby to lounge...

    John F -

    I think you should have stayed away from this one. You answer your own question in your first paragraph... how is this a slam against Cindy... her business is legal etc...

    The entire article is asking why Cindy is allowed to have made all her money through legal beer sales when everyone else who has done illegal activity is facing penalties...

    If the crux of the article is to demand the legalization of certain substances, or even the reduction of penalties or the end of the war on drugs... why bring Cindy McCain into it at all? There are plenty of well-known Beer companies in America... where is the BUDWEISER or COORS of pot, speed and meth?

    The author had some valid points about the war on drugs, but lost absolutely all credibility tying it to McCain.

    Look at the title again:

    Cindy McCain in same business as Greg Gibson

    Really? REALLY?

    She sells and transports illegal drugs?

    Please, John... I challenge you or anyone to give me one good reason on the than to smear Cindy McCain that her mention was necessary in this article?


    Report abuse

    dan krygiell wrote on September 02, 2008 03:58 PM: And the camelot Kennedy family would not be where it is today were it not for the bootlegging Joe Kennedy importing liquor form canada during prohibition and reaping millions while blatantly breaking the law! No punishment there either. Although with two sons assasinated and the 3rd stricken with cancer , I guess there is credence to "what goes around comes around"


    Report abuse

    Disordered Mental wrote on September 02, 2008 02:00 PM: Ken, I think both parties are guilty of an enormous amount of "twist and spin"... get real.


    Report abuse

    texasholdem wrote on September 02, 2008 01:37 PM: You must be jealous of Cindy to write a garbage article like this,she has done more to help people than you,crawl back in your hole, LOSER


    Report abuse

    kracs wrote on September 02, 2008 12:23 PM: The problem is'nt the length of his sentence, the problem is the length of the others


    Report abuse

    KEN wrote on September 02, 2008 11:57 AM: Twist and Spin as usual...
    LIBERALISM IS A MENTAL DISORDER!


    Report abuse

    Jen wrote on September 02, 2008 11:52 AM: I didn't really get this article. So what if Cindy McCain's family made her money comes from a legal industry. I'm a democrat, and don't get how he thought he could "smear" Mrs. McCain by this article.

    I usually don't agree with much Br. has to say, but I agree with about 80% of it this time.

    I don't think pot users have enough energy to commit crimes to get more pot, unless they're stealing twinkies to combat their case of the "munchies" :)


    Read All Comments