Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Opinion


EDITORIAL: The second debate

Again, neither candidate stands out

Tuesday night's supposedly "town-hall-style" presidential debate was close enough to a tie to represent a missed opportunity for Republican John McCain to reverse Democrat Barack Obama's current surge in the polls.

That surge is largely attributable to Democrats' success in blaming -- erroneously -- the current financial meltdown on "eight years of failed Republican economic policies" and "excessive deregulation" of the banking industry.


Most Popular Stories
  • VIN SUPRYNOWICZ: What stops mass murderers? A gun
  • SHERMAN FREDERICK: Call evil by its rightful name
  • EDITORIAL: Terrorism on trial
  • EDITORIAL: A pre-9/11 approach to terror
  • LETTERS: Public-sector workers are still doing well
  • LETTERS: Harry Reid: Working hard for all Americans
  • EDITORIAL: 'That's the ticket!'
  • Our politicians are the greatest, all right
  • EDITORIAL: I believe in free speech, but ...
  • LETTERS: A giant octopus threatens rural Nevada




  • The Arizona Republican came back strongly in the last half hour of the debate, which dealt mostly with foreign policy. His emotional "close," asking for the opportunity to serve his country one more time, was also stronger than Sen. Obama's tired call for "fundamental change" after asserting his "credentials" of having been "raised by a single mom" who "once had to apply for food stamps."

    Sen. McCain -- more's the pity -- seemed determined to prove himself as much a big-government "meddler" as his opponent, abandoning free-market principles to declare he would order his secretary of the treasury "to buy up all those bad mortgages and renegotiate them" ... turning Uncle Sam into presumably the biggest and most generous "landlord" in history.

    Cost? Scores of billions.

    Somewhere, Robert A. Taft and Barry Goldwater are turning in their graves.

    Still, Sen. Obama was not to be outdone in the department of spending promises, vowing to create jobs by "helping state and local governments set up road and bridge projects," at which point he would move on to "fix the energy system" and "fix the health-care system."

    Cost? Unimaginable.

    Sen. Obama said it's necessary to spend $150 billion over 10 years to develop alternative energy technologies, contending that's "the same way the computer was invented by a bunch of government scientists who were looking for a better way to communicate."

    What? Government scientists may have invented the rudimentary bombsight and torpedo tracking mechanical "computers" of World War II, but it was free enterprise -- a hundred guys working in their garages -- that gave us the laptop computer and Silicon Valley as we know it. Which government agency was it, precisely, that invented the "mouse"?

    Neither candidate would answer a simple question about whether "health care is a commodity." Of course it is. Doctors sell their services; drug firms sell their medicines; someone has to pay for that. Sen. Obama replied that "health care is a right" -- a doctrine that can eventually lead only to a bureaucrat holding a gun to a doctor's head and requiring him to treat a patient for free.

    Sen. McCain did not loudly refute that dangerous collectivist doctrine, though he did get his Democratic opponent to admit he would require parents to provide their children with health insurance coverage or else pay a fine.

    No one but an idiot believes we will see anything but a vastly larger and more expensive federal government under either of these two candidates, though Sen. Obama's spending priorities are certainly the most jaw-dropping, as he vows to nationalize the health industry and pour $150 billion in tax subsidies into developing alternative energy sources that can't make it in the free market.

    In normal times, America would not seriously consider placing in the White House a dreamy-eyed big-spending liberal with only two years experience at the national level and no experience in foreign policy, no experience meeting a payroll at a hot-dog stand, no experience in the military.

    But these are not normal times.

    John McCain held his own Tuesday night. But to launch an October surge, he needed to do more than that.

    This race is still Barack Obama's to lose.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 38 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Ladies and Gentlemen, I Present "abc" the Economist wrote on October 08, 2008 09:46 PM: Hey "abc,"

    With your vast knowledge of economics, explain to us now EXACTLY what the new Democratic majority in Congress has done in the last 20 months that has led us to the economic situation we are in today?

    Your's is a post hoc fallacy, or one of false cause. If it is not, answer the question above.


    abc wrote on October 08, 2008 09:08 PM: Good letter to the editor yesterday:

    This is 'change'?
    President Bush has been in office for more than 71/2 years. Almost two years ago, consumer confidence stood at a 21/2-year high. Gasoline cost about $2.20 a gallon. The unemployment rate was 4.5 percent. Americans were buying houses and taking vacations.

    But Americans wanted "change," so in 2006 they voted in a Democratic Congress. And, yes, we got "change." In the past year, consumer confidence has plummeted. Gasoline peaked at more than $4 per gallon. The unemployment rate is more than 6 percent. Americans have seen their home equity drop by trillions of dollars, and it's still dropping. Foreclosures have not bottomed out yet. The Dow Jones industrial average has taken a nose dive. Our 401(k) plans, stocks and mutual funds have almost evaporated.

    No matter what House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid tell you, the president has no control over these issues. However, the 535 members of Congress do, and it is currently a Democratic majority.

    What has this Congress done for the past two years? Absolutely nothing. Its approval rating is lower the president's -- at least he is in the double digits.

    Now Sen. Barack Obama, the Democratic candidate for president, claims he is going to really give us a change, with the help of a Democratic Congress.

    Just how much more "change" do you think we can stand?


    tokaloshe wrote on October 08, 2008 07:14 PM: If the LVRJ is wrong, are you telling me our next president will be the big phony liar? are you kidding me?
    The guy is like Mike Brady, in the debate he said he did'nt want russia causing any mischief around the world.
    America needs an idiot right now?
    He has stated that he will stand up and negotiate with anyone, iran, north korea, cuba. he bought your vote for a thousand dollar stimulus check? he won't answer questions about acorn, reverend wright, or ayers, and what little he says about any of it is a documented lie. His father in Kenya was a communist and was basically thrown out. Michelle Obama said that never once was she proud to be an american until barack was named the democratic ticket? So you think she should be in the white house? wow, you don't even have to be a patriot any more. We all talk about who we elect and we get what we deserve, this is one of the guys that should be thrown out for his pushing pushing pushing on sub-prime loans, instead some of you revere him like he is the golden child annointed by god himself to save the country? elite media won't expose him for what he is, do your due diligence, this guy is going to raise taxes on the american people if he gets in and if you look at the great depression that is precisely what made it longer and more painful in 1932 was the overburdening taxes on americans.
    http://www.sodahead.com/question/163002/?tko=polls_recent


    Sad Summerlin wrote on October 08, 2008 06:42 PM: kentankerous -

    I was supporting you, sir... but I was also going one step further in that it took an entrepreneur to launch it to the market. Sometimes great technology is invented with government grants, but the application of that technology is not realized until the private sector gets it's hands on it...

    This is why I think getting some good money into research institutes and then allowing for that to be commercialized is the ideal way to solve our energy crisis...

    Remember -- Xerox and PARC only wanted to use the Mouse for Copiers... it was Jobs that saw it in the hands of every child and adult using it for a computer...

    You are right to point out the snide reference:

    "Which government agency was it, precisely, that invented the "mouse"?"

    They are wrong about the invent part as you accurately say... but "we the people" would not have the mouse without the private sector... I am guessing that is what they meant... but who knows anymore... :)


    kentankerous wrote on October 08, 2008 06:29 PM: yup, engelbart in 1964 invented the mouse while working on a federally funded research program, was my point. it wasn't invented inside a government agency, but it was invented with the help of federal dollars. Lots of great research that makes a lot of capitalists a lot of money starts with a federal grant - not work being done inside a government agency, but work the government recognized as important and helped fund. Big difference, I think. The editorialist's snide oversimplification of what a 10 year $150B investment in alternative energy R&D would look like is what I was attempting to address.


    Sad Summerlin wrote on October 08, 2008 05:32 PM: kentankerous --- Douglas Englebart in 1964 invented the mouse... it had wheels on it...

    Bill English, builder of the original mouse, invented the so-called ball mouse in 1972 while working for Xerox PARC.

    Steve Jobs commercialized it with the LISA and MAC.

    On to the debate --- again...

    This IS Obama's election to lose. McCain has absolutely no clear vision right now... Obama is riding a wave of negative sentiment and the US main stream media has done a fantastic job of laying the blame 100% at the Republican's feet. Unfortunately, the blame needs to be shared between the Republicans and the Democrats on this one... and if we all took off our partisan glasses for a moment, we would see that both candidates represent nothing but the status quo and us blindly turning over more power to our government.

    Perhaps that is exactly what Americans want... we want to turn over the responsibilities of our lives, our mortgages, our jobs, our services to someone else so that we don't have to think about it... Imagine what it would be like if all we had to do was turn over a majority of our money to someone else to manage to ensure we have basic needs of life met...

    Hmmm... Anyone remember the movie WALL-E from this summer? Perhaps there's a message there...

    Or better yet... why not turn America into Iceland... 70% tax... people content... where is the innovation that comes from that group?

    It sounds wonderful... until some other society that has drive and responsibility decides to tell us we are lazy and we need to live by their rules...



    timinator wrote on October 08, 2008 05:10 PM: kentankerous, I thought it was the DARMA Initiative.


    kentankerous wrote on October 08, 2008 04:28 PM: Q: Which government agency was it, precisely, that invented the "mouse"?


    A: It was government spending via grants to Stanford Research Institute that funded the project that the inventors of the mouse was working on when they invented the mouse. DARPA, Air Force, and NASA monies.


    karl wrote on October 08, 2008 03:10 PM: A couple months ago the R-J (Republican Journal) predicted John McCain would be the next president.
    Of course many of us knew it was just more right-wing propaganda disguised as your friendly neighborhood newspaper.

    And now? Now the R-J's editorial board seems resigned to the reality of a soon-to-be-elected President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden.

    They aren't particularly quick but they're catching on.




    James wrote on October 08, 2008 02:13 PM: Helenweasel is desparate. She/he can't accept the fact that her/his pathetic GOP candidate, John McMetamucil, will be headed for an expensive retirement community after the Novemeber elections.

    You can relax now, John (and you too, Helen). Take your cup o' meds and learn to enjoy a quiet, calm game of bridge.


    Read All Comments