decelyn Herzer wrote on November 03, 2008 08:29 PM: That's true! You dissect Obamma's record, its disgusting!

Debra Chevez-Spraul wrote on October 18, 2008 09:53 AM: Mr. Strange, thank you for reiterating John McCain tried to get the “Federal Housing Regulatory Reform Act of 2005” passed. This bill was first introduced on January 26, 2005. On that same date it was sent to the Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs.
On May 25, 2006 John McCain presented the following to the Senate after hearing reports from Fannie Mae’s regulators; “Mr. President, this week Fannie Mae’s regulator reported that the company’s quarterly reports of profit growth over the past few years were illusions deliberately and systematically created by the company’s senior management which resulted in a $10.6 billion accounting scandal”. He stated he was joining as a cosponsor to underscore his support of quick passage.of GSE reform legislation and urged his colleagues to do the same.
As stated in my previous article, he warned of the dire consequences to the housing market, the overall financial system and the economy as a whole and called on the Senate to swiftly act on this. He saw a scandal which would harm our economy and acted on it.
In May 25, 2006 the House and Senate were controlled by the Democrats, and they voted this down.

Debra Spraul

Brent Miley wrote on October 17, 2008 12:38 AM: Z, I have seen zeitgeist it was very interesting, and I think every American kid in school should see it, could possibly change the world for the better.

patrick wrote on October 16, 2008 07:19 PM: You know Tim, let me tell you a secret; its the phony attempts to distract the American public over issues like...God knows what, that has put McCain so far behind in the polls.

All I have done, at least in this post, is say, then show, that the republicans changed the bankruptcy law. Now this is indisputable, so like a "good" republican, what do you do? Demonstrate that it was not true; no, you call names and say that I probably got the information from wikipedia. And when I point out that the Community Reininvestment Act, NOWHERE REQUIRES a bank to lend to anyone, you call me names (loony) and attempt to misdirect the argument.

Don't you understand that this is the same type of nonsense that the American public, particularly the independents, have come out loudly and said "Enough" to.

The problems that this country has today are too serious to people. They refuse to be distracted by such efforts to misdirect their attention.

If you had any "reasonable" argument against what I said like "No the Community Reinvestment Act REQUIRED banks to lend" and then pointed out the specific language from the law it would be one thing. Or if you could say "no, the republicans DIDN'T pass the bankruptcy legislation which made it more difficult for people to declare bankruptcy" it would be a reasonable argument.

As my law school profesors used to say: "If you have the facts on your side, argue the facts, if you have the law on your side, argue the law, if you don't have either the facts or the law on your side...bulls*&t"

The republicans are without the facts or the law, and they are taking my professors advice to bulls$%t to heart instead.

Z wrote on October 16, 2008 06:45 PM: I highly recommend it.

Tim wrote on October 16, 2008 06:34 PM: anyone who does'nt believe in a world wide conspirasy, needs to find the timminator.he forgot pearl harbor,twin towers,ww1,ww2,kennedys assasination,the murder of his kids,lincoln and martin luther.did i miss any timmanator?how about the selection of hussien obama for pres?keep on the wikipedia,i'm sure that's where patrick gets his nonsense.wars will always happen,but who will be the good guy?terrorists?muslim fanatics?china,iran,north korea?lets fence off america,keep mexico out and if anyone messes with us,kick their a-sses.that work for you?or should we sell out our nation to the u.n.?you forgot that one.or is obama a secret cousin of the other obama?patrick,maybe you can help.your looney as a cartoon.our own worst enemy is?

timinator wrote on October 16, 2008 06:07 PM: Z, no I haven't, but from reading the synopsis on Wikipedia, it sounds like a lot of interesting stuff is presented.

Anyone who hasn't questioned the events involving the 1913 Jekyll Island meeting, the Zimmerman telegram, the 1929 currency deflation by the Fed, the McCollum Memo, the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the July 1990 April Glaspie/Saddam Hussein meeting, and the collapse of WTC 7 and how they have all systematically brought this nation to the brink of ruin just isn't studying what is really going on.

Z wrote on October 16, 2008 04:49 PM: timinator, have you seen zeitgeist the movie?

timinator wrote on October 16, 2008 04:40 PM: dennis1944, you forgot to mention that Obama is about the most socialist Democrat in the Senate. Of course, McCain is about the most socialist Republican in the Senate.

No matter which you choose, you will get a continuation of the welfare/warfare state. Neither of these candidates will change that, since they are beholden to the globalists that have supported them. Their votes for the Banker BS Bailout certainly proves that.

Under either administration, the illegals will continue to flow across the border, your jobs will continue to be exported, the economy will continue to falter, the perpetual wars will become de rigeur, the dollar will become worthless, and the Constitution trashed.

Congratulations, republicrats, you will have been fooled into electing the evil of two lessors for decades and your liberty will finally be gone.

Welcome to fascist globalism, courtesy of the New World Order.

joe f wrote on October 16, 2008 04:33 PM: Vote for Obama!

I hope he wins and those socialist dems in congress wins too. So far since the dems won control of Congress we've had the largest increase of oil prices in history and the biggest stock meltdown (in dollars) in history.

It took a Carter to get a Reagan.

Read All Comments