Quantcast
MobileRJ | RSS Twitter Twitter FacebookFacebook E-mail Alerts
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

Opinion
Nov. 14, 2008
Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal

GEOFF SCHUMACHER: Generation O

GEOFF SCHUMACHER
MORE COLUMNS

After the novelist Michael Chabon spoke last week at the Vegas Valley Book Festival, I waited in line to have him sign a book.

In his speech, Chabon lamented that childhood isn't as free as it used to be. When he was a kid, he said, he could ride his bike all over his suburban Maryland neighborhood, exploring whatever caught his fancy. Today, many parents won't let their kids play in their own yard without strict supervision. Chabon worries that a highly programmed childhood inhibits creativity.

Most Popular Stories
  • EDITORIAL: If only we could tax more
  • LETTERS: With economists like these, who needs enemies?
  • J.C. WATTS: Sonia Sotomayor and bootstraps
  • LETTERS: Brace yourself for coming tax hikes
  • LETTERS: Nuclear power could be the answer for Nevada
  • EDITORIAL: Firemen's pensions past due for reform
  • EDITORIAL: Education 'consultants'
  • EDITORIAL: Hoe, hoe, hoe
  • EDITORIAL: Internet sales taxes
  • EDITORIAL: Ensign woes




    • When I stepped up to the table where Chabon was signing books, I mentioned that he and I are roughly the same age and that his comments about childhood had resonated with me. Chabon then said something that struck a chord: "Isn't it interesting," he said, "that the new president is our age?"

    Well, yes, it is interesting. I thought about it all the way home.

    Several days later, I'm still thinking about it. It's equal parts exciting (finally we get to rule the world!) and terrifying (uh oh, now we rule the world).

    Every generation gets a president to claim as its own. The baby boomers got two: Bill Clinton and George W. Bush.

    At age 47, Barack Obama straddles the line between baby boomer and Generation X. Some have already called him the first Gen X president. But politically and socially, Obama seems closer to the traits of the younger Millennial generation.

    Obama's campaign themes of hope, unity and change appeal to multiple generations. As I look at the election results, Obama's strongest support came from voters ages 18 to 44.

    A new term has been coined for this broad constituency: Generation O. New York Times reporter Damien Cave wrote last week: "The post-baby boomer era seems to have begun. The endless 'us vs. them' battles of the '60s, over Vietnam, abortion, race and gender, at least for a moment last week, seemed as out of touch as a rotary phone."

    So, what does Generation O believe in? Start with the three T's: tolerance, teamwork and technology.

    Generation O is multiracial. Obama did very well with black, Latino and Asian voters, as well as with young voters, who are more likely to be of mixed racial and ethnic background. This is a group that doesn't get worked up over skin color or ethnicity.

    Generation O is more interested in group achievement than individual glory. The thousands who volunteered for Obama's campaign represented an unprecedented outpouring of support for a presidential campaign. And their success at the polls reinforced the notion that by working together for a common cause, we can change the world. It's a movement that seems capable of holding together beyond Election Day.

    Generation O embraces the power of technology to bring people together and to solve problems. It also sees technology as a means to make governance more interactive and transparent. Speaking to this desire, Obama has promised to put all kinds of government documents online for public review.

    Writing in Las Vegas CityLife this week, Mike Prevatt effectively summarized the relationship between Obama and his supporters: "He is like them and they are like him: post-racial, post-boomer, post-globalization, 'post-everything.' "

    So, who's left out of Generation O? Old white men. John McCain ran away with the old white man vote. His Cold War rhetoric no doubt helped him with this group, as did his supporters' vile appeals to bigotry. McCain also probably snagged a few sympathy votes when he admitted he didn't know how to use the Internet.

    Generation O is a new deal in Washington. But for Obama and his supporters to accomplish their goals, they will have to work with the boomers and, yes, old white men who still dominate Capitol Hill. Enthusiasm and idealism could run into the buzzsaw of Beltway politics.

    As a Generation Xer raised in a world ravaged by divorce, drugs and AIDS, Obama is equipped to deal with compromise and disappointment. But what about his Millennial supporters?

    Cave notes that Millennials "have been trained to trust teams and systems" and so they "often struggle when things do not go according to plan." This reminded me of Chabon's discussion of modern-day childhood. He told the book festival audience that he and his wife took their kids to a house in Maine for the summer. Presented with acres of wild, wooded lands to explore, the kids stood in the doorway wondering what to do.

    Obama, by contrast with that image, might have the right mix of Gen X worldly skepticism and Millennial idealism to successfully navigate the choppy waters of Washington. Or he could be beaten and battered by the wily political veterans who don't want to let go of the status quo.

    No matter what, Obama's election signals the emergence of Generation X in the nation's corridors of power. How they will fare is unknown, but I'm pretty sure they can't do worse than the baby boomers.

    Geoff Schumacher (gschumacher@reviewjournal.com) is publisher of Las Vegas CityLife, owned by the same company as the Review-Journal. He also is the author of "Sun, Sin & Suburbia: An Essential History of Modern Las Vegas" and "Howard Hughes: Power, Paranoia & Palace Intrigue." His column appears Friday.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 42 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    John F wrote on November 15, 2008 11:26 AM: What I can't get over are people who believe that bigotry in the service of irony is a virtue.


    Fair and Balanced Fred wrote on November 14, 2008 10:38 PM: At 7:35 AM John F asked: "What does Michale Savage's religion have to do with anything?"

    How many times and in how many ways do I have to repetitively explain myself to John F, to his satisfaction? Maybe he can't get none.

    Maybe John F can't get over himself.

    Hey, hey, hey.

    That's what I say.


    Fair and Balanced Fred wrote on November 14, 2008 08:37 PM: Here's something on one of "HELENWEILS" favorite prophets, Nostradamus:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFGld1dESJo

    The book of Revelation was to the seven churches in Turkey warning them to repent for the "time is near." That was 2,000 years ago.

    "HELENWEILS", this isn't fun anymore. You have a lot of traits in common with paranoid personality disorder.


    Jen wrote on November 14, 2008 06:03 PM: Helen, I thought you were moving?


    HELENWEILS wrote on November 14, 2008 05:42 PM: To unfair and unbalanced Fred the Anti semite Freak

    The reason I'm aware of the prophecies

    is because I did a show on national radio for over 4 years. Not political,

    and these prophecies show up in the Hopi Indians, the Mayans, Nostradamas and the Bible. Haven't you heard about 2012?

    Watch the history channel, it will lay it all out for you.




    HELENWEILS wrote on November 14, 2008 05:40 PM: To unfair and unbalance Fred the Freak,
    on one thing we agree.
    You are telling the truth when you say.
    "I may be an obsessive-compulsive, selfish, mean, rude and nasty sociopath, but I know how to party!'
    By the way, HelenWeils is tongue in cheek for
    Helen, Hell on Wheels.



    Herb wrote on November 14, 2008 05:35 PM: Generation O has been brainwashed from the time they were small children. Both government schools and television turned them into the far left Socialists they are today.


    Fair and Balanced Fred wrote on November 14, 2008 05:06 PM: Irony, John F.

    Ever heard of it? The point being that Weiner's a nut job, and as a member of a historically repressed class, delights in his own intolerance.

    Got it?

    Also, it should be noted that the protagonist of Weiner's only novel is a man very, very much like himself, with a PhD in ethnomedicine (or something like that) with homoerotic fantasies.

    Ever wonder who Weiner hates most? Maybe it's Weiner.

    So, if I call him a gay bashing homosexual, please don't tell me I'm bashing homosexuals.

    And why even bring the guy up? Because it appears clear that many of the posters get their information from him or others of his ilk.


    John F wrote on November 14, 2008 03:43 PM: F & B Fred,

    Forgive me if this is a duplicate; the first post didn't seem to take.

    You can't have it both ways, irony or no. You can't call someone out for screaming "racism" at the same time you're spouting anti-semitism.

    Michael Savage's politics are contemptible, to be sure. On that we agree. I also agree that calling black people racist for voting overwhelmingly for Obama is absurd when they've voted for previous Democratic candidates in the same proportion for years.

    Criticizing Savage on the basis of his religion is wrong, however, and you should know this. People like Ahmadinejad, Robertson, and Kahane, who use(d) politics to try and force other people to live by the dictates of their religion, deserve censure and their religion must be part of the conversation because they themselves brought religion into the discussion.

    Savage, however, has never made his religion part of his politics. Your introducion of the subject smacks of ulterior motives.


    John F wrote on November 14, 2008 03:33 PM: F & B Fred,

    I am no fan of Michael Savage, in fact I have nothing but contempt for the man. Pulling his religion into this, however, is uncalled for, and you should know that. There is no excuse for it, irony or no. Savage himself doesn't make an issue of it, nor does he use it as a justification for his twisted politics.

    People like bin Laden or Robertson or Meir Kahane, who use(d) politics to try and force others to obey their religions, deserve censure and their religion must be part of that because they themselves have made it an issue. Michael Savage deserves scorn, but because of his politics, not his religion.


    Read All Comments