Comments (22) | Add a comment
EDITORIAL
As the wind blows
Tools
Updated: Apr. 12, 2009 | 9:54 p.m.
Apparently, the folks up in Storey County never received the memo ordering them to worship at the altar of alternative energy -- or else.
On Tuesday, county commissioners there questioned the merits of a planned wind farm in the mountains north of Carson City and west of Virginia City. The proposal, which would include wind turbines more than 300 feet tall, might affect tourism, generate noise and degrade animal habitat, said Storey County officials.
The New Comstock Wind Energy Project -- intended to supply power to thousands of homes -- is the brainchild of Great Basin Wind, which in December began the application process with the BLM.
As part of its push, the Nevada Appeal reported, Great Basin Wind will ask commissioners in Carson City, Storey and Washoe counties for approval from their planning departments. But the company didn't make much headway this week in Virginia City.
"We're not against the windmills or alternative energy," Storey County Planning Director Dean Haymore said Tuesday. "We're just worried this isn't the place."
Virginia City resident Candance Silveria, in a letter to commissioners, said, "The historical attraction of our area goes beyond the buildings, it is the entire visual experience that creates the atmosphere and ambiance so important to our livelihood."
The opposition didn't go over well with Rich Hamilton, president of Great Basin Wind, who argued that criticisms of the wind farm are "overblown." Besides, said Mr. Hamilton, residents will just have to get with the program and accept that wind turbines must be a part of the coming green energy wave.
"We don't have Lewis and Clark anymore," he told the Appeal. "There are no longer resources over the next hill."
Mr. Hamilton obviously knows quite a bit about generating wind.
Residents of Storey County are free to have their own opinions about the wind farm. If they want it, fine. But they are under no obligation -- moral or otherwise -- to accept the project no questions asked or to go weak-kneed in the face of Mr. Hamilton's condescending green nonsense.
This state -- this country -- has plenty of energy resources "over the next hill." The question during this misguided frenzy to prop up expensive and unreliable new energy alternatives at the expense of proven, cheaper options is whether we will ever be allowed to tap them.
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
By the logic of the post written by "if it was so viable" all forms of energy production are nonviable as they all receive subsidies.
..."over the next hill.." I would much rather have a forest of energy harvesting wind-mills in my back yard than a coal producing strip mine.
We can't have windmills because a study sometime back claimed thousands of birds were being killed by flying into those whirling blades. I checked further and found that the real documented number was about ONE a month.
Then there was the case against building them off the coast of Nantucket because the spoiled the view from the kennedy compound and Walter Conkrite's home.
Personally, I don't believe wind farms will measure up to the generated hype, much less the generated power. Besides, the enviro-wackos fight plans for transmission lines to get any power to users.
You could probably get more power by putting a scaled down windmill in your back yard. Just don't let your parakeet loose back there. Your neighbors might object to spoiling their view. Telling them you are saving the environment may have you facing the business end of a shotgun.
DRILL DRILL DRILL... drive the E-W's crazy.
Contrast this editorial with the RJ editors' stance on the building of coal plants in northern Nevada over the objections of local residents. They're all for that.
What's the difference between the two, you may ask. Annie hit the nail on the head. Go to:
http://www.stephensgroup.com/aboutourpartners/currinv-energy.html
You will see there a listing of the energy companies that the Stephens Group, the parent company of the RJ, owns either in whole or in part. They are all fossil fuel-based. Any move away from the coal plants toward wind power threatens their investments.
The editors' support of coal plants while opposing wind power is based on principle, of course: the principle of cui bono.