Opinion

EDITORIAL

You've got mail

Posted: Feb. 20, 2009 | 10:00 p.m.
Updated: Apr. 9, 2012 | 9:01 p.m.

District Judge Susan Johnson has ordered the Clark County School Board to turn over e-mails to a citizen watchdog who challenged its public records policy.

In an order distributed Tuesday, Judge Johnson ruled that e-mails created on public servers regarding public business fall within the state's definition of a public record. Judge Johnson ruled the burden was on the school district to prove that individual e-mails are not public records before denying them to activist Karen Gray.

Ms. Gray filed her lawsuit in June 2007, seeking copies of board members' e-mails from November 2005 to November 2006. Ms. Gray expressed concern that members might be violating the state's open meeting law by discussing School Board business in private, said Lee Rowland, an attorney with the ACLU of Nevada, which represented Ms. Gray.

Ms. Rowland praised the order Wednesday, saying the judge ruled "broadly in favor of public disclosure."

The judge ordered the district to create a "Vaughn index" of e-mails it considers private under Nevada public records law, including "a general description of each document withheld and a justification for its non-disclosure." The log will be reviewed by the judge.

Judge Johnson also found Ms. Gray is not required to reimburse the district a sum in excess of $4,000 for the scores of hours officials there said it would take to process her request, because her request does not constitute "extraordinary use of personnel" under the meaning of the law.

While the judge did allow further testimony as to the costs, she was properly skeptical of what certainly could look like an attempt by the school district to cool any record-seeker's ardor by threatening to charge $4,000 to sort a file of e-mails which -- as the judge determined -- can actually be sifted with a few computer keystrokes and mouse clicks.

Judge Johnson's ruling quite properly makes full public disclosure the "default setting," putting the onus on the government agency to explain why it believes any specific e-mails or phone logs should be kept secret. In Judge Susan Johnson, the public's right to know how its business is being conducted appears to rest in good hands.

Comments

Registration Notice: The Review-Journal has implemented a new registration procedure that requires all existing and new accounts to validate and login using Facebook. Visit the Registration FAQ for more information.
Terms & Conditions

The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

  1. HELEN WEILS Feb. 20, 2009 | 9:16 a.m. Report Abuse

    Good for Judge Johnson. These government employees need to be ousted!

  2. Patrick.Gibbons Feb. 20, 2009 | 8:12 a.m. Report Abuse

    That is not all, CCSD is trying to charge Ms. Gray up to $100 for each public records request she does asking for paper documents.

  3. Virgil A. Sestini Feb. 20, 2009 | 4:24 a.m. Report Abuse

    It is about time that something of this sort began to hold the CCSD trustees accountable for their actions. For too long this board has sought to have it all their way...neglecting to provide the public with proper access to public records and to deny the public free, open discussion and input with board members at board meetings.

    Maybe, just maybe there will eventually be a grand jury investigation of all of the financial activities going on in this district. Tremendous waste of tax dollars has been going on for years...creating and hiring superflous administrative positions like Area Superintendents and their associates, mentors, supervisors, and related overseers of this district. The costs have been tremendous and at the sacrifice of books, paper, materials, equipment and certified teachers in the classroom.

    There is no doubt they circumvented the open meeting law in the recent naming of Veterans Tribute H.s. in place of the name originally requested by over 300,000 veterans, parents and others for the past 20+ years. They did it there way without proper opportunity for input, discussion and exchange with board meetings.

    Allowing 2 minutes to present a particular problem, question,etc is insufficient and does not allow for public input. This board of PTA/soccer moms must be brought under control...the sooner the better

Saturday, May 26, 2012
Partly Sunny Partly Sunny, 62° Weather Forecast