Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

Opinion


GLENN COOK: A closer look at university system cuts

For more than a year, Chancellor Jim Rogers has been screaming from the tops of the university system's ivory towers that Gov. Jim Gibbons is beyond irrelevant. The budget-cutting Republican is a political Neanderthal, a public official so loathed and isolated by his own repugnance that he makes Richard Nixon seem cuddly by comparison.

"The man has absolutely no regard for the welfare of any other human being," Rogers wrote in his freshest attack, a Feb. 22 commentary for the Nevada Appeal deriding the governor's opposition to tax increases and support for allegedly apocalyptic reductions in subsidies to higher education.


Most Popular Stories
  • THOMAS MITCHELL: Sacrificing free speech won't appease fanatics
  • EDITORIAL: Stood her ground
  • Smart meters not all they're cracked up to be
  • LETTERS: Nursery did the right thing with laborers
  • EDITORIAL: Numbers stink?
  • VIN SUPRYNOWICZ: Some things are worth fighting for
  • EDITORIAL: Going to extremes
  • LETTERS: Teachers not most important learning variable
  • SHERMAN FREDERICK: Here's a scary thought
  • LETTERS: Agassi remains a good citizen




  • Rogers assures us that Gibbons is fully marginalized, that his fiscal policy will not be realized, and that the Democrat-controlled Legislature will raise taxes and carry Rogers' water by allowing the university system's funding to continue to grow regardless of the state of the economy that supports it. Yet Rogers resorts to name-calling to convince the masses of what he says they already believe -- kind of like picketing a PTA meeting to pan child molesters.

    On the surface, it seems like wasted breath. Unless, of course, all this noise is being made to keep taxpayers and lawmakers focused on the university system's alarming version of the truth while distracting them from numbers that make the fiscal health of the system considerably less sympathetic.

    In other words, cause a panic.

    Gibbons' proposed general fund for 2009-11 totals $6.2 billion, roughly the same amount as the state's current modified, two-year budget. To avoid raising taxes on a recession-ravaged economy, and to preserve or bolster public school, public safety and welfare programs as much as possible, Gibbons proposed significant reductions in appropriations to higher education. His budget -- the one Rogers and legislative Democrats claim is already dead -- cuts about $375 million in university system subsidies, on top of the salary and benefit reductions he recommended for all state workers.

    The state's colleges and universities are not constitutionally mandated services, and unlike other bureaucracies, they have many other funding sources, including tuition and fees, endowments, services, sponsorships, grants and donations.

    Nonetheless, higher education officials and legislators loyal to the higher education system immediately began claiming that the governor's plan would cut the budgets of UNLV and UNR by about 50 percent. "We might as well shut down the institutions," lamented Assembly Speaker Barbara Buckley, D-Las Vegas.

    But state general fund appropriations typically make up less than half of higher education revenues. Even if the governor's budget passed -- and we've been assured that it won't -- the system would have about $2.5 billion to blow through over the next two years, with $1.29 billion coming from taxpayers. The operating budgets of UNLV and UNR would have to be cut less than 20 percent -- that's deep, but certainly not the 50 percent figure that's being thrown around.

    The scaremongering continues unabated. Regents Michael Wixom and Jason Geddes trotted out the doomsday scenarios in a Wednesday Reno Gazette-Journal commentary.

    "With the proposed cuts, the state college and all four community colleges would be shut down simply to save the core functions at UNR and UNLV," they wrote. "If we were to save the state college and community colleges, UNR or UNLV would be eliminated. In both scenarios, Nevada's medical, dental and law schools would be closed."

    Those desperate choices were presented again, in earnest, at a joint legislative hearing Friday morning. Not even the Lied Animal Shelter could rival the suffering and sacrifice outlined in officials' testimony.

    It's all baloney. The governor's budget -- which, remember, is in rigor mortis and doesn't account for the state's full share of the federal stimulus funding -- allocates $349 million to UNLV, $253 million to UNR and $204 million to the College of Southern Nevada over the next two years. Subsidies to the medical, dental and law schools are nearly unchanged from the current biennium. Who are these people kidding? No part of this system would be forced to close, not even the ill-conceived Nevada State College at Henderson.

    As a fail-safe, Rogers has hired former Assembly Speaker Richard Perkins, the Democrat who muscled this unwarranted expansion of the university system into the city he once represented, to lobby the Legislature on behalf of the system. Rogers has also hired former Assemblyman Josh Griffin to lobby for more funding. Those two men are being paid a total of $15,000 per month.

    In addition, UNLV has retained at a cost of $5,000 per month its retired law school dean, Richard Morgan, to lobby the Legislature. (Wixom and Geddes say the law school faces closure? Ha!) And no fewer than 10 university system employees, from institutions including Nevada State College, UNLV, UNR and Western Nevada and Truckee Meadows community colleges, are registered as lobbyists for the 2009 session -- all paid by you to persuade lawmakers to do what Rogers and Democrats say is already a done deal.

    That small army doesn't account for the fact that Assemblyman Ruben Kihuen, D-Las Vegas, is an employee of the College of Southern Nevada, that the wife of Senate Taxation Chairman Bob Coffin, D-Las Vegas, is an assistant professor at UNLV, and that the wife of Senate Majority Leader Steven Horsford, D-Las Vegas, is a postdoctoral fellow at UNLV's College of Education.

    It's good to have friends in high places, especially when more than 1,300 people on the higher education payroll have salaries of at least $100,000 per year, when less than half of the system's students go on to graduate and when it its tuition rates are among the cheapest in the United States.

    University system officials and their allies need to instill fear in the public to maintain the scary rate of budget growth that colleges and universities are addicted to -- about 8 percent per year this decade. They've worked the political establishment too hard for too long to see the gravy train derailed. They're committed to bamboozling the public and the media so everyone believes general fund appropriations are higher education's sole source of funding, and that the governor is cutting the system's entire operating budget, not one part of its revenue.

    Gibbons' budget is not the end of the world -- especially not in this frightening economic tumble -- but Rogers clearly needs it to be. Regents claim they've muzzled the chancellor, yet they're talking the same talk. Friday's legislative hearing is proof they're just getting warmed up.

    Be afraid. Be very afraid.

    Glenn Cook (gcook@reviewjournal.com) is a Review-Journal editorial writer.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 24 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    hss46 wrote on March 03, 2009 11:18 AM: I don't know who's dumber, Cook or some of you selfish right wing nuts that will say anything to support a rabid anti tax position. Cooks says the Governor's budget is $1.29B for Higher Ed. What is accurate is that $1.29B is what is is being reduced from down to $880M. As to that being less than half of the Higher Ed budget, about the only thing thats true there is that General Fund dollars aren't the only funding. There is tuition, which has been raised over 10% over the past several years and the endowment (which has been reduced substantially as the market dropped). With the cuts proposed, the loss of endowment income and the reduced enrollment (even if no new tuition hikes are imposed) all of the Higher Ed system's revenue sources have dropped and only liars with an agenda would use silly artificial numbers to claim that a $400M drop isn't calamitous.

    And those of you who say the system sucks, possible its because it is funded sooooo low compared to our neighboring states. Hard to have a great system with lower state support (UNLV gets half per student of what UCLA gets, and their endowment is orders of magnitude higher). But hey, 'i don't wanna pay taxes so I'll complain loudly'.

    Admit it, you will say anything to justify not paying taxes. No you won't admit it because you are dishonest about your real motivation.


    Report abuse

    honeybee wrote on March 02, 2009 09:38 AM: This is incredible! The Nevada higher education system is a joke...I've had to work with and supervise many of these graduates...less than stellar. Until Nevada's educators get serious about really educating our young people, they will get not one ounce of support from me or my tax dollars. As for my children, they will go to a college or university outside of Nevada, regardless of the cost!


    Report abuse

    loo loo loo wrote on March 01, 2009 09:44 PM: Fire Rogers, save the system.

    Kick his flabby backside out the door.

    Feed him to the republican dogs.

    Tar and feather.

    Run out of Dodge.

    He can take that gold digg'n truck driver wife of his too. Talk about zero class. A walking joke.


    Report abuse

    JN wrote on March 01, 2009 08:13 PM: Furthermore: The number of personnel who make over 100,000 is less than 7% of the payroll pool. Compare that to other surrounding schools. Additionally, if you factor in the employee's degrees, years in school, work experience, training, contributions to their field, and marketability, you might better understand their value to the university. These are people who can make phone calls or write letters to advance a student's career in many ways or perhaps even begin their career. Ask the student if that's worth anything. Some of you write that UNLV is a second-tier institution---prove it---but do you make it top-quality by paying it's administrators and faculty less? Does that attract better employees or simply people wanting a job? As opposed to criticizing higher education, get one.


    Report abuse

    JN wrote on March 01, 2009 08:00 PM: And to "Mark": Who is the "establishment" you speak of? And who in this "establishment" said tuition at UNLV is the highest in the West? As a supporter of UNLV, I'm hoping to keep our tuition one of the lowest in the Western Region and am glad to do so. What are you advocating here? Are you sure of the argument you're presenting?


    Report abuse

    JN wrote on March 01, 2009 07:42 PM: The writer of this column, Cook, and a commentator, Carolyn, seem to think that just because they said it makes it true. I would think the RJ columnist should be required to research his facts before he publishes them in an article: "The state's colleges and universities are not constitutionally mandated services" is simply not true. Per Carolyn, her facts and statistics are simply too many to address. It's gibberish with no basis in truth whatsever.


    Report abuse

    UNLVFan wrote on March 01, 2009 02:05 PM: I want a job that pays over $100k/year. Does anyone know what you do in these types of position? What degree should I major in?

    ASSOCIATE VP FOR ENROLLMENT & STUDENT SERVICES $145,299.00

    EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR STUDENT SYSTEMS
    $150,000.00

    EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF ENROLLMENT TECHNOLOGY $110,000.00





    Report abuse

    Rebel wrote on March 01, 2009 01:56 PM: I agree with Carolyn. Look at the salary list for UNLV. http://hrfs.nevada.edu/hrweb/

    You can download it into an Excel spreadsheet and sort by department, position, or salary. I found it surprising that there are so many people making well above average salaries at a below average rank university.


    Report abuse

    Mark wrote on March 01, 2009 12:14 PM: Carolyn is telling it like it is. I know for a fact that everything she says is true. That there are people that won't believe reflects the sad state of education in Nevada. People believe what the establishment tells them no matter what the consequences.
    Your childrens future is being destroyed serving special interest.

    An easy point to examine on your own. The establishment claims college tuition rates in Nevada are the highest in the West. You've heard that over & over. Do a Google search and look up the rates at UCLA, OSU, WSU, ASU, Utah, KSU ... Nevada is the lowest!! California schools are 2.5 times Nevada. How about the East. Pennsyvania is 5 times! Continue and you can verify everything in Carolyn's post. So, why didn't any of you protesters do it? Too stupid? Too lazy? On the government payroll?

    First principle of propaganda .. if you tell a lie long enough, people believe it to be true. I, for one, am getting tired of Rogers and his BS. It's time for change.


    Report abuse

    Truth wrote on March 01, 2009 11:52 AM: obviously the person below that mention Rush (illegal drug taking) Limbaugh needs an education. Too bad there is no money to afford him one.


    Read All Comments