Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon

Opinion


VIN SUPRYNOWICZ: Obama 'bitterly clinging' to his fake gun numbers

American gun owners, en masse, are "casting their ballots" on how much they believe Barack Obama's campaign-trail promise to "not take away your guns."

They're driving the price of ammo through the roof, swarming gun shows, hauling away cases on hand trucks, leaving the floors of the ammo suppliers' booths as naked as a wheat field after the locusts pass through.


Most Popular Stories
  • EDITORIAL: Stood her ground
  • LETTERS: A moral obligation to not bankrupt the country
  • LETTERS: Nursery did the right thing with laborers
  • VIN SUPRYNOWICZ: 'Allowed' to carry for self-defense
  • EDITORIAL: Numbers stink?
  • LETTERS: Teachers not most important learning variable
  • LETTERS: Agassi remains a good citizen
  • EDITORIAL: Clunk, clunk
  • LETTERS: Put aside re-election interests for nation's good
  • EDITORIAL: Gotta have faith




  • Glen Parshall at Bargain Pawn in North Las Vegas reports "I got 20,000 (rounds of) .223 on Saturday and by Tuesday it was more than half gone. And that's only because I limit customers to a thousand rounds per day, otherwise I'd be out already."

    And are the shortages just in the popular light rifle-calibers -- .223 and 7.62X39?

    "No," Glen reports. "The shortage is total."

    Industry newsletters report that should demand drop to normal, it would still take a full year or more to bring inventory levels up to normal in local gun stores.

    The hoplophobes -- now nearing a veto-proof majority in Congress with the defection of Arlen "Magic Bullet" Specter -- don't have to "take away our guns" if they can ratify some kind of international treaty (bypassing and overruling U.S. statute) that bans ammunition reloading as "manufacturing without a license" and then drives the price of ammunition through the roof by requiring every bullet and brass cartridge to bear some kind of "unique identifying number," supposedly for the use of police in tracking "weapons used in crimes."

    (Naw, no bad guy would ever simply use stolen rounds, the way they use stolen cars with stolen license plates as getaway cars.)

    Larry Pratt, head of Gun Owners of America, asks "Remember candidate Barack Obama? The guy who 'wasn't going to take away our guns'? Well, guess what? ... A week ago, Obama went to Mexico, whined about the United States (and bemoaned before the whole world) the fact that he didn't have the political power to take away our semi-automatics. Nevertheless, that didn't keep him from pushing additional restrictions on American gun owners.

    "It's called the Inter-American Convention Against Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms. ... This imponderable title masks a really nasty piece of work.

    "First of all, when the treaty purports to ban the 'illicit manufacture of firearms,' what does that mean?" asks Pratt in a late April GOA release.

    "Illicit manufacturing" of firearms is defined as "assembly of firearms [or] ammunition ... without a license ... " "Hence, reloading ammunition -- or putting together a lawful firearm from a kit -- is clearly 'illicit manufacturing.' "

    Article VI of the treaty requires "appropriate markings" on firearms. "It is not inconceivable that this provision could be used to require micro-stamping of firearms and/or ammunition -- a requirement which is clearly intended to impose specifications which are not technologically possible or which are possible only at a prohibitively expensive cost," says GOA.

    And Article XI of the treaty requires the maintenance of any records, for a "reasonable time," that the government determines to be necessary to trace firearms. "This provision would almost certainly repeal portions of McClure-Volkmer and could arguably be used to require a national registry or database" -- gun registration, the GOA warns.

    Meantime, the Libertarian Party points out even the statistics used by Mr. Obama to supposedly justify his "emergency need" to "block the flow of arms to Mexico" are bogus.

    "Is Barack Obama 'bitterly clinging to falsified numbers' in his bid to push his anti-gun treaty?" asked the Libertarian Party in an April news release.

    "This war is being waged with guns purchased not here, but in the United States. More than 90 percent of the guns recovered in Mexico come from the United States," Mr. Obama said in a face-to-face April meeting with Mexican President Felipe Calderon in Mexico City.

    But that claim, the LP points out, "is blatantly false. According to information supplied by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives the real number is closer to only 17 percent.

    "There is a reason Obama is intentionally spreading false information about American firearm businesses," says Donny Ferguson, Libertarian National Committee Communications Director. "He ... promised anti-gun groups he would enact gun bans and is hoping to scare people into voting away their own rights. ...

    "ATF Special Agent William Newell tells Fox News that between 2007 and 2008, around 11,000 guns used in Mexican crimes appeared to come from the United States and were submitted to the ATF for tracing. Of those, only 6,000 could be successfully traced. Of those, only 5,114, according to testimony in Congress by William Hoover, were found to have come from the United States.

    "Obama's '90 percent' number refers, not to the percentage of 'guns recovered in Mexico,' as Obama claims, but to the 'percent of the traced firearms' according to an ATF spokeswoman.

    "Mexican authorities report that in those two years, a total of 29,000 guns were recovered at 'crime scenes.' That means 68 percent of the guns recovered by Mexican police did not even appear to come from the United States. That means only 5,114 out of 29,000 guns used in Mexican crimes were found to have come from the United States," the Libertarians conclude. "That figure would be 17 percent, not the 90 percent repeated by Obama.

    During his term in the Senate, Obama earned an "F" rating from Gun Owners of America, as well as from the National Rifle Association. In an April 11, 2008, campaign speech in San Francisco, Obama claimed gun owners are simply "bitter," racist people who "cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them."

    "Obama is 'bitterly clinging' to falsified numbers, hoping he can take away the constitutional rights of 'people who aren't like' him," The Libertarian Party concludes.

    Vin Suprynowicz is assistant editorial page editor of the daily Las Vegas Review-Journal, and author of "Send in the Waco Killers" and the novel "The Black Arrow." See www.vinsuprynowicz.com/

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 37 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    Tannim wrote on May 12, 2009 10:18 AM: A thousand .22 rounds really is nothing when you can fit almost 20,000 rounds of it in a simple tackle box or tool box, and still have space left over for the cleaning kit.

    Glad I stocked up during the W years, when at least that moron left guns and ammo alone, at least relative to now.


    Report abuse

    Butch Lyons wrote on May 11, 2009 02:13 PM: To all the mental midgets out there, who try to claim intellectual superiority. They claim that the right, are a bunch of red-necks. That they mistake, take out of context, or can not understand the language. Well heres what Obama said about it.

    Sarah Pulliam

    Sen. Barack Obama called his description of small town Americans - "they cling to guns or religion" - his "biggest boneheaded move."
    Obama's original comments were made in April at a fundraiser in San Francisco and have followed him ever since The Huffington Post published them. He was describing his difficulty with winning over working-class voters in Pennsylvania.
    "And it's not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations," Obama said.
    Obama described the comments as boneheaded during an interview with The New York Times set to be published Sunday.

    If you will notice, he did not claim that he was taken out of context, that he was misquoted, misunderstood. or that his words were some how twisted. It seems that you are guilty of doing exactly what you claim the right is doing.
    I also think that he ment exactly what he said. He just thinks it was not PC. He feels he sould not of said it outloud.


    Report abuse

    Joe C wrote on May 11, 2009 09:56 AM: For unbalanced Fred,

    Below is the link to Senator Frank and Maxine Waters ended any chance to regulate Fannie May and Freddie Mack in 2004.
    Anymore proof on issues you need to convince you of how delusional you are please I will be glad to post it.
    Link below,

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs&feature=channel_page


    Report abuse

    Ron in FL wrote on May 11, 2009 09:10 AM: 1000 rounds is NOTHING! To anybody who has had the pleasure of "plinking", you know what I mean. In just one trip to the shooting range, my daughter will burn through 550 rounds, in about an hour. She has a blast (no pun intended) and leaves with a BIG smile on her face. The Hopolophobes need to get a life, and spend some time at a shooting range. It's just plain FUN, so get over it.

    What I want to know is why does a snowboarder need to own more than one snowboard, or a tennis player, more than one racket, or why do people stock food in their cupboards? What are they DOING with all that food? Who *really* needs to stock more than 2 cans of chili at any given time? Well!!??!!??

    It is clear to anybody with a thinking mind, that the current trends are moving in a direction of disarming all law-abiding citizens. There's no mistaking it - even the UN is getting involved. If outright gun bans are ineffective, the gun-grabbers will do an end-run and ban ammo, or make it so expensive it is no longer affordable to the average citizen. The motivation is the same as the motivation which preceded Nazi Germany's weapons ban. Disarm the people so the Government can take unfettered control. As American government grows, so will the desire to disarm the citizenry.

    It would be in the best interest of this country if two things happened (the sooner, the better).

    1) Drastically shrink the size of our Government.
    2) Dramaticall increase the number of armed citizens!

    Now, excuse me. I have to go buy some more


    Report abuse

    Titus wrote on May 11, 2009 07:59 AM: The fact that Unbalanced Fred thinks BO's foot-in-mouth comment in its original context is a good thing tells you everything you need to know. Let me guess--he lives on one of the coasts and is deathly afraid of "flyover country" because, although he's never been there, he's positive it's a haven of illiterate rednecks toting shotguns because, well, that's what his friends tell him down at Starbucks.


    Report abuse

    Bill Smith wrote on May 11, 2009 07:12 AM: And the sheep continue to play the “demopublican verses republicrate” game.


    Report abuse

    TimeRanger wrote on May 10, 2009 09:49 PM: Any elected official and anybody else that takes an oath to "...Uphold the Constitution of the United States.." that attempts to enact legislation or enforce laws that sidestep the Constitution, should be tried for Treason.


    Report abuse

    Fair and Balanced Fred wrote on May 10, 2009 08:48 PM: Vin took Obama's words completely out of context and formulated his paranoid rant into a headline.

    The cons can't lead, so they continue to mislead. Josey, below, political scientist, seer, sage and soothsayer, wants to convince us it's an expert at something, but absolutely fails to post any citations supporting its claims.

    Such is the mentality of AM radio.

    Watch out for black helicopters.


    Report abuse

    Joe C wrote on May 10, 2009 07:23 PM: To Butch,
    You are forgetting that all evil in the world is caused by the U.S. and especially white people.
    If a third world government is involved in something bad, somehow the U.S. forced them to do bad things.

    The mentality of too many democrats and the Obama administration could care less about honesty or common sense like you posted.
    The delusional believe they are the tolerant ones that will make changes by just blaming the U.S. and its people.

    Sadly they are the most intolerant and will implode their own agendas with their own stupidity and arrogance.

    Mind you I’m not a republican but I certainly find the liberal democrat puke a cold sore on common sense.


    Report abuse

    Butch Lyons wrote on May 10, 2009 05:44 PM: If I was to believe that 90% of the guns used by the drug cartels in Mexico. Came from the USA wouldn't I have to believe that most of the guns used by the Columbians also came from the USA also? And nobody noticed. How silly! Do people not know that these country's, have a history of corruption in high government positions. How many generals & others have become rich selling guns. We are not talking about just guns. There are grenades, land miners, & rocket launchers to name a few of the weapons they have. These are military weapons. Every revolution in the world can buy military weapons, if they have the money. There is no doubt that they would be illegal, according to the government involved. When the USSR went broke, how many weapons went on the black market? Hell, their still worried about nuclear weapons they can't account for. I would be amazed if the cartels didn't have enough weapons stock piled to last them a 100yrs. After all the weapons are a good investment, they never loose value. I think it is laughable, to think the cartels who are making billions dollars. Need to send people to US gun shows to buy weapons. Would anybody think for 1 moment, that these people do not run in the same circles? I would think that sometimes the gun runners could be payed in dope, which they would sell to dealers for an additional profit at the other end. And the cartel wouldn't have to put out any cash.
    All of a sudden Obama has become very twofaced, that he would out&out lie to the people. Unforgivable.


    Read All Comments