Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Opinion


EDITORIAL: They just can't help it

Government building projects move ahead

Watching local governments try to go "on the wagon" and stop spending increasingly scarce tax dollars during tough economic times can be like watching a family member try to "go cold turkey" on his or her own drug of choice.

You awaken at 2 a.m. to find the kitchen light on. And there's your loved one, puffing away on old butts recovered from a hidden ash tray.


Most Popular Stories
  • THOMAS MITCHELL: Sacrificing free speech won't appease fanatics
  • EDITORIAL: Stood her ground
  • Smart meters not all they're cracked up to be
  • EDITORIAL: Numbers stink?
  • VIN SUPRYNOWICZ: Some things are worth fighting for
  • EDITORIAL: Going to extremes
  • LETTERS: Nursery did the right thing with laborers
  • LETTERS: Teachers not most important learning variable
  • SHERMAN FREDERICK: Here's a scary thought
  • LETTERS: Agassi remains a good citizen




  • Las Vegas' plans for a new city hall have become more expensive and possibly unaffordable, Mayor Oscar Goodman confirmed back on June 18, marking the second time in two days that one of his signature downtown projects had hit a snag.

    "I've asked the city manager to have a manager's review concerning the feasibility of city hall," Mr. Goodman told his weekly news conference, that week. "Everything's changed. It's a new world."

    The mayor blamed skittish financial markets, saying the city originally planned on an interest rate of around 5 percent but that -- as of mid-June -- it appeared the best the city could do was 7.5 percent.

    "That's a difference of millions of dollars," the mayor said.

    That same week, meanwhile, the downtown Mob Museum project became embroiled in a dispute between two contractors bidding on one of the final phases of the project. The matter could head to litigation, tying up the museum's opening for years.

    Struggling taxpayers who are expected to fund all these fancy plans may have been tempted to breathe a sigh of relief. But that would have been premature.

    As of July 1, it appeared both the projects were back on track to get hooked up to their long-term intravenous taxpayer feeding tubes.

    "Most Las Vegas City Council members are still interested in building a new city hall," The Review-Journal reported on July 1. "Today they told staff members to nail down construction and financing costs so they can vote, perhaps as soon as September, on whether the city can afford one."

    The council voted 5-1 to proceed.

    "I don't think we have a choice," said the new, revised, July 1 Oscar Goodman. "Unless we want to throw up our hands and go back to the direction this city was going in 10 years ago."

    Added Mayor Pro Tem Gary Reese: "We get chastised for even thinking about it -- and that's all we've done. Now we're going to get out there and really try to buy that new car. And if it turns out we can't afford it, I won't support it."

    The city has already spent 10.1 million precious tax dollars on planning and preparation work, including relocating utility lines. Figures presented today estimate the new city hall's cost at $157 million, plus $28.9 million for a nearby parking garage.

    The city has approval to borrow up to $267 million to finance the project. But Chris Bohner, research director for Culinary Local 226, points out "I think the financial markets have a better understanding of risk than the City Council. The financial markets have said, 'We don't think your project's feasible.' "

    Going over that $267 million limit would require the city to start the approval process all over again, Mr. Bohner pointed out.

    The Council members act like they're being dragged forward by some invisible but irresistible force. They attempt to create a record of reluctance that they can cite, later on, when the project turns out to be yet another over-budget boondoggle. Why not, instead, simply shelve the plans till they -- and we -- find out where the economy is really headed?

    With the Democrats in Washington, D.C., busying themselves raising taxes on America's remaining private-sector employers to pay for everything from "universal health insurance" to "global cooling," the promised recovery could still be a long time coming.

    Meantime, despite declining tax revenues and a stable (at best) school-age population, three construction contracts were approved by the Clark County School District last week to build three new tax-funded elementary schools in North Las Vegas, southwestern Las Vegas and western Henderson.

    Oh, good grief.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 6 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    Herb wrote on July 05, 2009 01:37 PM: This is the voters fault more than anything. They keep electing and reelecting tax and spend politicians.


    Report abuse

    Benny Binion's statue wrote on July 05, 2009 11:04 AM: Don't forget the $21 million museum in Henderson that was voted in during Jimbo Gibson's last days in office. It's all about monument building, folks. Oscar wants his name on a couple of plaques.


    Report abuse

    Bat Guano wrote on July 05, 2009 09:02 AM: Fiscal responsibility - ha ha.

    Just another government oxymoron.


    Report abuse

    Peter wrote on July 05, 2009 08:59 AM: Tax and spend, and spend, and spend. They don't know any other way. Like a moth to a light. That's how they operate. The only solution is to squish them and replace them with some other creature that operates differently. No, not just another color of moth, but something wholly different.


    Report abuse

    Outoftowner wrote on July 05, 2009 08:41 AM: Here's a novel idea. Why not just vote them out of office first chance we get? If the voting public did that more often, slippery, self serving politicians would listed for once to the people who voted them into office in the first place.


    Report abuse

    HELEN WEILS wrote on July 05, 2009 07:44 AM: DUMMYCRATS AND RHINOS STARTING WITH THE PREZ AND TRICKLING ALL THE WAY DOWN THE LINE THINK THAT MONEY GROWS ON TREES. THEY WANT TO INSURE THAT EVERY OVERPAID UNION GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE HAS THE FINEST OF EVERYTHING.
    AFTER ALL, WHO ARE WE? THE GREAT UNWASHED MASSES AKA TAXPAYERS TO LIMIT THEM IN ANY WAY???
    DISGUSTING. TEA PARTY ANYONE???