Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Opinion


J.C. WATTS: Death of a medical specialist

Medical specialists are doctors who train for many years to understand every system and nuance of the human body. They complete their residency at the local hospital, and then they commit many more years to the study and understanding of a single human system in order to specialize in a particular surgical technique or diagnosis.

Medical specialists are doctors who can cure what general practitioners are unable to recognize. And they will no longer exist under President Obama's nationalized health care plan.


Most Popular Stories
  • VIN SUPRYNOWICZ: What stops mass murderers? A gun
  • SHERMAN FREDERICK: Call evil by its rightful name
  • EDITORIAL: Terrorism on trial
  • EDITORIAL: A pre-9/11 approach to terror
  • LETTERS: Public-sector workers are still doing well
  • LETTERS: Harry Reid: Working hard for all Americans
  • EDITORIAL: 'That's the ticket!'
  • Our politicians are the greatest, all right
  • EDITORIAL: I believe in free speech, but ...
  • LETTERS: A giant octopus threatens rural Nevada




  • The glory of American medicine today is that it encourages students of medicine to dig deeper, work harder and find a specialty niche in which they can invest their time and training because -- through these specialties -- they will save more lives, offer more choice to America's sick and ailing population, and yes they will probably make more money.

    Dr. Alfred Bonati, an orthopedic surgeon in Hudson, Fla., invested a lifetime of medical training to discover a unique and successful non-invasive spine surgery for treating back injuries and chronic back pain. He developed and patented new surgical tools. He perfected his technique, established a specialty clinic, and has performed more than 35,000 surgeries. Now, he trains other orthopedic doctors to perform his spine surgery so even more patients can be treated. He has thousands of patient testimonials that tell how this specialized surgical technique restored the patient's quality of life, and in some cases their ability to live without a wheelchair.

    Under President Obama's nationalized health care program, surgical clinics and highly advanced surgical procedures will be a thing of the past. The goal of nationalizing health care is to standardize services, not to specialize in them. Rather than treating each individual as a unique medical case, everyone will be treated the same.

    Government-run health care systems do not encourage personal achievement for doctors, nor do they pay for additional knowledge and expertise. Medical schools in this country will be graduating only general practitioners; specialty fields will no longer be taught because there is no government reward or financial incentive for specializing more than the person next to you.

    Government-run health care systems also do not pay for specialized life-changing and even life-saving procedures. Medicare will not pay for any procedure it deems new, advanced or outside of the realm of 1980s care; and Medicare's policy is non-negotiable.

    The doctor who now specializes in treating eyes, the nose and throat area, children, cancer, pregnancy, women's issues, joint damage and more will no longer exist. You will have one neighborhood doctor to visit for all your medical needs; and he or she will prescribe the same treatment as every other doctor based on the services for which the government has agreed to pay. They will offer you nothing more. You may as well refer to your general practitioner as your government provider because under President Obama's plan they are one and the same, and they will be all you have.

    America's medical community rises to a level of excellence that is unsurpassed anywhere else in the world. For this reason, many foreign people travel to America to seek medical treatment. Many travel from countries with nationalized health care programs. Today, America is a destination for custom medical care.

    However, tomorrow, President Obama's government run health care plan will change all of that. When American health care no longer allows for specialty treatments and services, where will foreign people go? More importantly, where will Americans go to receive a life-saving, advanced medical treatment?

    In spite of what we think of the flaws of our health care system. I believe the great majority of Americans enjoy the best health care in the world.

    They don't want a trillion-dollar overhaul of the health care system that will offer them less choice, fewer services, will drive their specialty doctors out of business and offer less hope for future advancement in the field of medicine.

    Most Americans are tired of watching the cups get shuffled while trying to keep an eye on which one contains the penny. The Obama administration should stop playing shell games with those things that matter most to America and recognize Americans still favor choice over government control.

    J.C. Watts (JCWatts01@jcwatts.com) is chairman of J.C. Watts Companies, a business consulting group. He currently works with Alfred Bonati, M.D. and the American Society of Medical Doctors (www.theasmd.org). Watts is former chairman of the Republican Conference of the U.S. House, where he served as an Oklahoma representative from 1995 to 2002.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 57 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    SUSAN wrote on July 26, 2009 07:17 AM: I WOULD JUST LIKE TO ASK CONGRESSMAN WATTS IF HE TOOK ANY OF THIS INTO CONSIDERSATION WHEN HE SUPPORTED MR. OBAMA FOR PRESIDENT??


    Joe B wrote on July 21, 2009 12:56 PM: J.C. is right on the mark. The only way to control cost is to standardize and fix/control cost. This is not the solution iof we want to maintain our high standard of care in this country.

    The insurance industry however is not to blame for rising cost. It is Medicare and it's reimbursement rates along with the care of uninsured individuals. This is the root of the problem. Not the 47 million so called un-insured that is just another red herring. Saving from this program redirected to that are more red herrings. The government is not fixing the problem just making it different. The only article I have found that proposes real, viable, sound, and FAIR solutions can be found at Healthcare Compromise
    Good reading but it is a few pages long.


    Michelle wrote on July 20, 2009 09:58 AM: Oncologist you are right on the mark! I don't want to see our specialists "step down" to GP's. If the health insurance industry got a complete overhaul and more oversight health insurance would be affordable and everyone would get great care. Have you ever LOOKED at an Explanation of Benefits after you go to a doctor and your insurance is billed? The doctor will bill about $100 for the appointment, the insurance company will say they're only contracted to get paid $75, the insurance company will pay them $20 and then under many plans tell you you're responsible for the other $55. What are we paying our monthly health insurance premiums for (mine are higher than my rent for 2 healthy, youngish people)? I work in property and casualty insurance not health but I read the industry publications and the problem is not the doctors it is the big health insurance companies. One carrier in Michigan made a profit in 2006. They are a mutual company and therefore have to distribute profits among the insureds when they have a surplus in any given year. Instead of doing that they bought a work comp carrier in another state. When the DOI of Michigan brought them up on it and investigated and fined them one of the execs claimed to not understand that they were a mutual company. Really? I am a liberal democrat and I do agree that we need to do something to make health insurance accessible to all but I am afraid Obama's plan might be a failure. I don't understand why they didn't go after the big insurance carriers. They are the reason we are in this mess.


    Carol Barash wrote on July 20, 2009 09:40 AM: I just read your aticle in the Las Vegas Review Journal. I thoughly agree with your article. We must have specialists that know their field. If this is taken out of the Medicial scene We will have Jack of all trades master of none. I have friends and family members who would not be alive today if a specialist did not take control of their problems. The President MUST NOT stop specialists from being in the medicial scene in his nationalized health care plan. The public must be aware of this instead of only being told of the cost of our medicial programs.Our lives are at stake here. All must do something to stop this.Write to all who have a say in passing the nationalized health care plan.SAY NO

    Carol Barash


    Wayne wrote on July 20, 2009 08:38 AM: While this sounds true, where are the facts to back up the claims? Where is the proof that any of this look into the future is true? You will have one neighborhood doctor? How so? Americans have the best health carein the world? Then why don't we live the longest? This article is long on opinion but short on facts.


    oncologist wrote on July 20, 2009 06:30 AM: Nobody has addressed the issue I posed yesterday: namely, how will you convince current physicians to participate or even practice, and how will you convince talented college students to even bother going to medical school?
    Somehow, superior pay for superior performance has been turned into a shameful concept. Nobody's going to volunteer to give away a decade of their life to train for a field that doesn't pay them back. They'll become personal injury lawyers or bankers instead---because Lord knows we need more of both---while the lines outside the remaining physician offices get longer.
    The only physician I've seen comment works at "a top ten medical center"---and consequently already receives a check drawn on the public dole. He could care less about Obamacare, or likely favors it, as so many of those pesky private practitioners will be pushed out: leaving all the more people to be forced into academic centers with their impersonal service and hellish inefficiency.
    Like national healthcare? Try a VA hospital sometime. Quite a few of my patients have: before they leave, and come to see me instead. Because treatment is personal, state of the art, timely, and delivered with the individual patient's needs and goals in mind. Expect that to be yet another casualty of Obamacare.


    Gene44 wrote on July 20, 2009 03:28 AM: People have not been afforded the opportunity to read the full bill and understand what is going to happen and this article states it fully. Not only that, but, Obama stated it out loud when asked about older people getting operations - maybe they will have to take more pain killers.


    Fair and Balanced Fred wrote on July 20, 2009 02:04 AM: It's interesting that someone brings up "Bureau of Indian Affairs style health-care."

    Now, probably nobody here knows anything about the Bureau of Indian Affairs health-care, but it sure SOUNDS scary, doesn't it?

    Notice that instead of talking about Medicare, which is much more logical, the writer talks about the Bureau of Indian affairs.

    The cons can't lead so they consistently mislead.


    The question wrote on July 19, 2009 08:09 PM: Why do so many idiots fall for the Kenya syndrome? That's where you vote for an authoritarian socialist for president. Brilliant Larry.You're smart! I sure hope Obama forces everyone to pay for my Bureau of Indian Affairs style health care.


    Jason wrote on July 19, 2009 06:35 PM: It's actually Stockholm morons. I am black and liberal policies have done nothing but keep the black community right where it is. Blacks can do it without help from government, and I am insulted Larry at being called an Uncle Tom becasue I believe in individual freedom and don't wnat charity from elitist white liberals who think they are smarter than me. Welfare has set us back generations Larry, and you keep voting for more of it. Who is the real Uncle Tom here? Who has Stockholm (not Helsynki) Syndrome here Larry?


    Read All Comments