Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - Opinion

Wednesday
Mar 17, 2010
Mostly Sunny
Mostly Sunny 77° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed

Opinion


LETTERS: Mayor tap dances around firefighter pay issue

To the editor:

Regarding Alan Choate's article of July 21, "Mayor says contracts covered but has doubts":


Most Popular Stories
  1. Heat on Titus
  2. Big government is here to protect us all
  3. Judging a judge
  4. Open ... and shut
  5. A lottery would raise money for education



I was thunderstruck that Mayor Oscar Goodman, aka the master of reconciliation, has chosen to tap dance right by another issue. Hey, good for you Mr. Mayor. This is no time to be concerned about the financial well being of our citizens. They are not unionized and can tough it out.

As the mayor commented about the firefighters: "I'm glad that we haven't gotten into a fight with them. I think they do a good job for us and I want them to be happy." How could they not be happy? Superior salaries, superior benefits, superior retirement and superior working conditions.

If keeping firefighters happy at the expense of all others is your goal, you have been very successful.

EDWARD R. DUFFY

LAS VEGAS

 

Government efficiency

To the editor:

Wow, what a great letter from Steve Brittingham (Aug. 6). It is so great to find out that the government can run things more efficiently than most businesses. After all, business needs to make money. Government doesn't make money, it just spends money taken from the taxpayers.

It's great to know that Social Security (going broke), Medicaid (going broke), the IRS (ever dealt with them?) are doing so well. These are all programs that are run by the truly efficient government. That's probably why the government doesn't need any more money. After all, didn't the government win the war on poverty?

Forrest A. Henry

NORTH LAS VEGAS

 

Going south

To the editor:

Must the Review-Journal add Oliver North to its stable of sneer-meisters? I'm referring to the likes of Ann Coulter and those propagandists from the Hoover Institute and Heritage Foundation.

Mr. North's recent commentary headlined "Democrats relent on care for injured vets" is disjointed and disgustingly unfair to the Obama administration. I would like to remind Mr. North that, after eight years of the Bush administration, the Veterans Administration was a shambles, along with our economy and our standing in the world. Fortunately, President Obama appointment Gen. Eric Shinseki to clean up the mess, the same Gen. Shinseki who -- after decades of valuable service to our country -- was the object of snotty comments by the previous administration.

In addition, Mr. North quotes a marine as saying, "Sure hope the crowd in Washington doesn't screw it (Afghanistan) up." Unfortunately it was screwed up in 2003 when President Bush, who was intent on cutting a bold and decisive figure, opted to open a second front against Iraq. The result: We've been in Afghanistan for eight years. That's twice as long as the Civil War.

Talk about incompetence. The bipartisan 9/11 commission issued a report saying the past administration misjudged the gravity of terrorist threats. For the details, read Richard Clarke's book on his repeated warnings to the administration about possible attacks.

Mr. North is correct when he says that many people think of his cronies in the Iran-Contra affair as "gun-toting, knife-wielding, overage adolescents." Or perhaps they fancied themselves to be dashing international 007s in their efforts to scuttle congressional mandates.

Secretary of State George Schultz under President Ronald Reagan was that rare animal, a conservative who understood the ins and outs of international geopolitics. He said the North group was "snookered by a bunch of rug merchants" for playing footsy with the Iranians.

ROLF GOETH

LAS VEGAS

 

Medicare grab

To the editor:

Why is the Republican party against Medicare? Why do they want to take it away from senior citizens? Most seniors depend on Medicare for their health care, but now the Republicans want to take it away from them and make them buy private insurance, which is much more expensive and which most seniors can't afford. The Republicans' vehement opposition to socialized medicine and single-payer insurance can only mean that if and when the Republicans gain control of Congress, they will immediately reform health care by ending Medicare. Then seniors will be forced to move to Canada in order to get any health care at all.

We must not let that happen. We must stop the Republicans now from taking Medicare away from seniors.

Richard Pratt

LAS VEGAS

 

Just the facts

To the editor:

In response to the Aug 6 letter from Randall Buie:

Mr. Buie states that "Republicans are ignoring nearly every poll that shows citizens want health care reform ... ." So let's see:

-- Quinnipiac poll: Three out of four Americans don't believe government-run health care will be deficit-neutral and 59 percent of Americans are against health care reform if the measure is supported by only the Democrats.

-- Gallup poll: Sixty-three percent say the president's plan will worsen their personal medical care.

-- National Public Radio poll: Forty-seven percent oppose Obama's plan and 42 percent support it.

-- New York Times/CBS poll: Seven-seven percent of Americans fear costs will increase under government-run health care.

-- Time poll: Fifty-six percent fear losing freedom to choose their own doctor/plan under government-run health care.

Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll: Forty-two percent say Barack Obama's plan is a "bad idea" vs. 36 percent saying it's a "good idea."

I may be naïve but when the level of opposition tops 50 percent -- as indicated in some of the polls -- health care foes seem to be widespread, coming from the right, the middle and even from the left.

In addition, a CNN poll conducted over the weekend indicated 71 percent of Americans say they are likely to attend a town hall meeting to tell their congressmen their opinion on health care. The Democratic National Committee and MSNBC have labeled these concerned citizens as "small mobs" and "rabid right-wingers." And according to Mr. Buie they are "being trained and bused in." I would certainly like the DNC, MSNBC and Mr. Buie to delineate their statements with proven facts. It will be difficult because in doing my research I could not find any data to substantiate those statements.

George Pucine

LAS VEGAS

 

Recycling hype

To the editor:

I read that only about 5 percent of Southern Nevadans actually recycle, whether through Republic Services or at local recycling centers. Well, I finally found out why this summer. I went up to Silver Dollar Recycling with three or four bags of plastic bottles and cans. After sorting and weighting it, I got a ticket and got to redeem it for a whopping 85 cents. No wonder Nevadans don't waste their time recycling.

There is no incentive for complicating our routines by sorting and separating our garbage and recyclables. I'm from the Bay Area and I know I could have gotten at least $20 for what I turned in there. I wonder if it's because they pay per pound and not per can, but you can go just about anywhere in California and they recycle.

With this whole "Go Green" movement, recycling should be through the roof. Republic Services and the city businesses should step up their game to get us to recycle, because I'm not believing the hype.

Alexis Thiiel

LAS VEGAS

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Leave Your Comment 50 Reader Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Current Word Count:

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

Report abuse

SamT wrote on August 10, 2009 09:46 PM: @patrick: Gazing in the mirror while you wrote your weak reply, were you?

Yep, thought so.


Report abuse

patrick wrote on August 10, 2009 10:50 AM: @sam:

I would say your posts are full of absolutely nothing, but that overstates the case.

You don't post facts, you don't post theory, you don't post philosophy, you don't post logic, you post namecalling and dismissals that lack the most marginal "sense" and nothing else.

Your posts reek of the kind of screaming nothing that the healthcare industry pays for at "town hall meetings"; lacking anything but volume.


Report abuse

MTS wrote on August 10, 2009 09:11 AM: Oliver North single-handedly discredited himself over 20 years ago. It is folly to take him or anything he says seriously. If you look up the word "Phony" in the dictionary, you'll find his picture.


Report abuse

SamT wrote on August 09, 2009 08:21 PM: @patrick: I'd say your posts are generally un-informative hyperbole: chock full of sweeping, empty generalizations, or sickly, unctuous paens of praise to your latest hero, Obama.

Typically, consistency or facts (or either taken together) are malleable to you, thus half-truths and lies come easily and without regret.

Hell, let's call it what it truly is: regurgitated leftist Agitprop in a stew of wild-eyed fanaticism.

In short, you have the economic and political insights of a street-level, rabble-rousing boor, circa 1919.

Little wonder you fail to convince.


Report abuse

patrick wrote on August 09, 2009 07:40 PM: Some posts say something, some posts say nothing, other posts just, well, its hard to say.

I guess when your paid by the word and your bosses are getting low on funds, you are at a disadvantage eh sam?


Report abuse

SamT wrote on August 09, 2009 05:45 PM: Surprised to find the usual leftists furiously wasting their time, today.

A bit of advice:
Do not waste too much energy, as squandering it, here, will adversely affect your ability to properly genuflect and toady to your heroes (and Masters) Gore, Clinton and Reid, tomorrow. Unconditional sycophancy, as you well know, takes a toll.

Rest up!


Report abuse

patrick wrote on August 09, 2009 10:34 AM: because we are expending resources to accomplish the above, isn't this people today doing something so that people in the future can benefit? Isn't that a good thing?

I don't understand the selfish self interested short sighted opinions of people who can see no further than their own faces, and it seems to me that anyone who questions why a person today would do anything for anyone in the future, or vise versa, fits that category.


Report abuse

patrick wrote on August 09, 2009 10:32 AM: The public education system in this country is responsible for educating hundreds of millions of Americans. This system is, and has been, the envy of every country in the entire world and has been a standard of excellence for nearly two centuries and has been copied by nearly every civilized country in the world.

It has served as the engine for America's economy and as a basis for American society during that time.

Are there problems, obviously, in a country as diverse as this one would you expect anything less? People talk about how people from other countries come to this country to take advantage of our "great" "private" healthcare system, but how many of those same people mention the millions of foreign citizens coming to take advantage of our outstanding public universities? Hardly any that I know of despite the fact that this happens every since day.

Tim, you're welcome, and no I didn't dodge your question, I used an analogy which obviously escaped you; as a society we sometimes pay for things we don't necessarily use ourselves, like healthcare, education, defense, support of National Parks and recreation facilities, prisons, and the list goes on.

The reason we do this is in order to maintain an orderly, and in my humble opinion, fantastic society that the world has never known before.

Future generations will be paying for each of the above mentioned programs, at least in part, because we currently are running a budget deficit, which they also will benefit by.

Say, instead of taking actions today to preserve this country's national parks, or water quality, or air quality, the people who live tomorrow do not have things as good as we do. Is that "right"? Now consider that the people today are actually "hurt" in some sense


Report abuse

GH wrote on August 08, 2009 10:33 PM: Of all the government programs to bring up in a healthcare debate Patrick chose Education?

Our education system sucks, why would you want to remind people of how badly our government ran schools have failed our kids when government run healthcare is on the horizon?

What's ironic is you've brought a great tangent into the healthcare debate. Private schools are generally fantastic, public schools are generally poor. Private healthcare is generally fantastic, public healthcare will probably be ?


Report abuse

Tim wrote on August 08, 2009 10:11 PM: Patrick,

Thank you for the lesson on government, but you completely dodged my question.

My question was not that some citizens will pay for services that they may never need; my question was why should future generations pay for your health care? Why should future generations pay for something for you, when you are not willing to pay for it currently?

That was my question.


Read All Comments