Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Opinion


EDITORIAL: 'Punish' their enemies

The man expected to become the AFL-CIO's next president said Monday that lawmakers will pay a price if they abandon a government-run option in any health care overhaul.

"We need to be a labor movement that stands by our friends, punishes its enemies and challenges those who, well, can't seem to decide which side they're on," said Richard Trumka, currently the AFL-CIO's secretary-treasurer.


Most Popular Stories
  • VIN SUPRYNOWICZ: What stops mass murderers? A gun
  • SHERMAN FREDERICK: Call evil by its rightful name
  • EDITORIAL: Terrorism on trial
  • EDITORIAL: A pre-9/11 approach to terror
  • LETTERS: Public-sector workers are still doing well
  • LETTERS: Harry Reid: Working hard for all Americans
  • EDITORIAL: 'That's the ticket!'
  • Our politicians are the greatest, all right
  • EDITORIAL: I believe in free speech, but ...
  • LETTERS: A giant octopus threatens rural Nevada




  • The threats came less than a month after a protester outside an Aug. 6 health care forum meeting organized by Rep. Russ Carnahan, D-Mo., was sent to the hospital after a beating inflicted by goons wearing SEIU T-shirts.

    That was the day the AFL-CIO announced plans to mobilize labor activists to attend town hall meetings in 50 congressional districts to counter conservative protesters, and the same week White House aides David Axelrod and Jim Messina traveled to the Capitol, advising senators to organize their events more carefully and to work with labor unions and other friendly groups to generate the appearance of widespread enthusiasm. "If you get hit, we will punch back twice as hard," Mr. Messina told senators, according to two people in the room.

    The Service Employees International Union broke from the AFL-CIO five years ago.

    In remarks Monday to the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank, Mr. Trumka singled out lawmakers "who say they are all for health care reform, but refuse to stand up for a public system that puts people before profits."

    Mr. Trumka and other labor leaders have expressed frustration with signs that Mr. Obama and other lawmakers are wavering in their support of a public option.

    The warning is consistent with comments that Mr. Trumka has made in several recent public appearances, saying the nation's largest labor federation would do more to hold elected officials accountable if they fail to back labor's causes, including "card check," the union plan to increase their membership by allowing unions to sidestep secret ballot workplace elections.

    Can organized labor really "capture the hearts and minds" of America by aligning itself with -- heck, identifying itself as -- the most radical and thuggish element of the socialist left?

    For that matter, if one of the perks of union membership is that unions promise to negotiate good company-paid health benefits for their members, how does it help union members for Mr. Trumka to demand that his members' taxes be raised (along with everyone else's) to pay for the health care of the uninsured (many of them illegal aliens), who must then -- by definition -- be non-union members?

    It's all a bit puzzling.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 41 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    The Dems are being hornswaggled, and they don't know it wrote on September 03, 2009 12:55 AM: Oh, I don't think the Democrats are still upset because they are just now realizing they've elected Bush to a third term, and that whole Hopey, Changey thing was just a pipe dream.

    I think the D.C. Democrats have seen a power shift, in Obama's power base, and the Dems are bit players.

    The administration's agenda is wrapped up in the Czars and special advisers, and the direction their moving in the environment, energy, health care and education. And especially the resources they are developing to push their message, like, the NEA and schools.

    I mean really, whose work do you think Obama really supports and listens to on policy... it's not Reid, Pelosi, and certainly not Clinton, they're just tools.


    Tom wrote on September 02, 2009 11:35 PM: You seem confused...Bush had "cabinet members" and Obama has "czars" of which he didn't mention one single time during his campaign. BIG difference there. Congress has oversight on what Cabinet members do, and obviously went along with everything Bush did....including the Democrats. Czars, on the other hand, have no congressional oversight and answer ONLY to Obama. Now he has at least 15 czars, not counting the "special advisers". Obama is trying to create a shadow government answerable only to him, completely bypassing Congress and the Supreme Court.
    Keep right on crying about Bush did this and Bush did that, but Obama has kept the same policies in place including spying on Americans, helping AT&T cover-up their spy activities, rendition flights, a war in Afghanistan which Obama has declared "necessary" about a hundred times so far, and more troops on the way, etc, etc, etc.
    Democrats are still upset because they are just now realizing they've elected Bush to a third term, and that whole Hopey, Changey thing was just a pipe dream.


    patrick wrote on September 02, 2009 10:37 PM: Lets see, 7 months in and republicans are whining like bit*hes; gonna be a fun first term.

    I can only pray that the next three years during President Obama's first term is as gut wrenching, vomit inducing, and mind numbing on a daily basis as the minion of the devils every day in office was for Democrats like me.

    If only President Obama could appoint enough white hating cabinet members whose job it was to make republicans wanna leave the country, like the minion of the devil formerly in the White House did to Democrats when he appointed racist, xenophobic, fascists, who wanted nothing more than to turn this country into a dictatorship (under his control of course) by ridding this country of, what he called, "the God*amn Constitution". He "worked" hard to achieve this goal by the end of his first term, subjecting American citizens to being thrown into dark holes where he told them they had no rights, except the right to be tortured to death (this was an actual argument bush and his "justice czar" made before the United States Supreme Court in the "Padilla" case which you can check out if you wish) abolished perhaps the single most important reason why this country was established in the first place (the right to habeas corpus, and you can check that out too if you wish) by absolutely revoking the 4th, 5th, 6th and 8th Amendment Rights in the Constitution (he did this by spying on EVERY communication passed between American citizens and anyone else for that matter, as well as denying American citizens their "guaranteed" and formerly "inalienable" rights to have all charges against them be known, and to have an attorney represent them, and to have a trial in front of an impartial judge)

    republicriminals.


    Jim wrote on September 02, 2009 07:05 PM: All The President's Czars

    http://www.examiner.com/x-3704-Columbia-Conservative-Examiner~y2009m8d28-All-the-presidents-czars

    Excellent article.


    That's not true Tim wrote on September 02, 2009 07:00 PM: Fred sometimes uses dem-underground too!


    Fair and Balanced Fred wrote on September 02, 2009 07:00 PM: Tim can't refute anything below, so it goes after some made-up enemy (news sources it hates). The cons can't lead so they consistently mislead:

    "'Punish' their enemies."

    Doesn't this describe Karl Rove and the Bushies' treason in regards to the treasonous outing of covert CIA operative Valerie Plame in order to punish her husband for revealing the Bush administration's lies about Niger's supposed sale of yellow-cake uranium to Iraq?

    Punish enemies. In the case above, more than that. Actual treason.

    Punish enemies. Doesn't this describe the antics of former House Speaker (currently under indictment) "The Hammer", aka "Hot Tub" Tom Delay?


    Tim wrote on September 02, 2009 06:38 PM: Who's cryin here Freddy?Oh yeah,YOU.

    We all know the details of the big mouthed broad who was'nt CIA.Maybe she learned to keep her mouth shut.

    But if livin in the past helps you blank out the present,more power to ya
    Un-Balanced Fred.


    Fair and Balanced Fred wrote on September 02, 2009 06:23 PM: Tim says wa-a-a-ah! Nobody's objective except the propaganda arm of the GOP: AM and Fox. Wa-a-ah!

    (Not to mention those paranoid, anonymous emails the right-wingers keep forwarding to each other).

    More, the treason by the Bushies in the Plame case was ALL OVER the media, not just left-leaning media, and Tim has absolutely no idea what I read.

    The cons can't lead so they consistently mislead.

    The Bush administration should be tried for treason, even before war crimes in the Hague.


    Tim wrote on September 02, 2009 06:07 PM: Un-Balanced Fred gets his info from move-on and the other bastion of truth,huffington post.

    Move on Fred,move on,that's so yesterday.Defend your messiah or are you trying to change the subject off his dumb a@# policys?
    Your president is the new tratior.sorry.


    Fair and Balanced Fred wrote on September 02, 2009 06:01 PM: "'Punish' their enemies."

    Doesn't this describe Karl Rove and the Bushies' treason in regards to the treasonous outing of covert CIA operative Valerie Plame in order to punish her husband for revealing the Bush administration's lies about Niger's supposed sale of yellow-cake uranium to Iraq?

    Punish enemies. In the case above, more than that. Actual treason.

    Punish enemies. Doesn't this describe the antics of former House Speaker (currently under indictment) "The Hammer", aka "Hot Tub" Tom Delay?


    Read All Comments