Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - Opinion

Wednesday
Mar 17, 2010
Mostly Clear
Mostly Clear 65° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed

Opinion


VIN SUPRYNOWICZ: We'd hardly know a leader if we saw one

The main point that probably deserves further mention about last week's Dead Kennedy Funeral Parade was the behavior of the press, which wept and moaned and gnashed its collective teeth with hardly a dissenting soul to say, "Enough, already," as though the corpse of a pharaoh was headed for its final hoedown with the sun god. I'm surprised they didn't decide to embalm the guy so people could troop past and touch the yellowed cadaver like they've been doing with Vlad "The Impaler" Lenin in Moscow for the past 70 years.

It was all further evidence that statism has now become something close to a national religion, the subtext being that great things can be accomplished only through the giant wealth transfer schemes now under way in Washington.


Most Popular Stories
  1. Heat on Titus
  2. Big government is here to protect us all
  3. Judging a judge
  4. Open ... and shut
  5. A lottery would raise money for education



Did anyone notice an equivalent outpouring of grief and tribute when free-market economist Rose Friedman died in California Aug. 18? When we lost Murray Rothard or Friedrich Hayek or Ludwig von Mises?

Practically every month dies some entrepreneur or industrialist whose hard work improved our lives far more than Ted Kennedy ever did, giving us better, safer, less expensive cell phones, car engines, laptops, refrigerated produce -- you name it.

Do we see wall-to-wall 24-hour TV coverage of the funeral parades of these giants of American capitalism? Of course not. Our media dismiss such characters as "corporate greedheads." They get no credit for their achievements because they were motivated by "mere profit," while Ted Kennedy apparently went about his work in a saffron robe, sitting out on the sidewalk with a begging bowl each evening in hopes someone would toss him some scraps for supper.

"Education reform"? The mandatory youth propaganda camps were already counterproductive, but the No Child Left Behind Act that Teddy helped pass should really be called "No Motivated Student Shall Excel." Miring inmates and staff alike in a stultifying swamp of testing and "teaching to the test," this "bipartisan" abomination finishes the job of converting the schools from an enterprise where the most gifted and talented were encouraged to move ahead quickly into a Grimpen mire where the gifted go insane with boredom while the entire enterprise focuses on elevating the marginal performance of the most reluctant and under-motivated internees in the room, many of whom -- you can't make this stuff up -- are literally brain-damaged.

"Protecting the rights of the little guy"? Ted Kennedy never met an unconstitutional victim disarmament law that he didn't race to embrace like it was a campaign worker on Rohypnol. Maybe he hoped if we could just get rid of all the guns, no one would ever again assassinate a president, the way John Kennedy had Ngo Dinh Diem and his brother ousted and subsequently assassinated (the very next day, and were Jack and Bobby ever surprised!) in early November 1963. (That is the presidential assassination you were thinking of, right?)

Leadership? Imagine for a moment Ted Kennedy had really stopped to contemplate what kind of future he was leaving our children, and had then decided to use his wealth, his power and prestige to undertake one truly great act of leadership.

Imagine for a moment that Edward Kennedy had stepped before the TV cameras a year ago and stunned the nation with a simple, eloquent speech:

"Good evening. Some of us come to the ends of our roads unexpectedly. Others of us receive a final blessing; we're told we have a few months to put our affairs in order.

"I've made plenty of mistakes; I'm deeply sorry for them. But I got to thinking, is there one last thing I should still do to help the country that has done so much for me and my family? I think there is.

"I've been working with a few members of the lower house. Tomorrow they'll introduce on my behalf a bill we call the Economic Freedom and Prosperity Restoration Act.

"My family has remained wealthy and powerful because our wealth is protected in an immortal, tax-proof family trust. Most Americans can't set up such trusts today; the IRS changed the rules years ago.

"We've also remained wealthy because we pay very little income tax. Dad never declared much of his bootlegging income, and I don't pay much, either. Families with old money can arrange things that way, while the most productive of our fellow Americans -- the kind of who actually invent and design and manufacture things -- are taxed to the hilt.

"The Economic Freedom and Prosperity Restoration Act is in three parts.

"First, it changes tax law to allow any American family to set up an immortal, tax-free trust, just like the ones the Kennedy family and the Rockefeller family have enjoyed for nearly a century.

"Second, it repeals the federal personal income tax. No American employer will withhold any more income tax; no American will file another 1040 form; everyone gets to keep their own money, just as the Kennedy family always has.

"The income tax currently provides about 30 percent of federal revenue. It's true enough we'll have to reduce federal spending, permanently, to make this work. So the third part of the Economic Freedom and Prosperity Restoration Act calls for reducing next year's federal budget to two-thirds the size of this year's. No accounting tricks, no moving more things 'off budget.' That will still leave us with a much larger federal budget than when John Kennedy took office, than when Richard Nixon took office, than when Ronald Reagan took office.

"Time to close the Departments of Labor, Agriculture, Energy, Education and Health and Human Services, for starters. None existed a century ago; none are authorized in the Constitution.

"Then we're going to have to turn to our Ponzi schemes, Medicare and Medicaid and Social Security. For all Americans younger than 50, we need to end these programs immediately. Send them a modest check in partial compensation for what they've paid in to date, urge them to invest it -- since there'll be no benefits when they retire -- and set them free. Their paychecks will jump by at least 30 percent. The economic stimulus should be huge.

"Meantime, for those currently retired, and those age 50 and older today, the programs will continue. No current retiree's benefits will be cut. Benefits for those retiring in subsequent years will be reduced, in keeping with the amounts still flowing in.

"That means that by 2050, our great socialist experiments of Medicare and Medicaid and Social Security will end. Americans will once again be a free people, un-numbered. Thank you very much; God bless a free and prosperous America."

An "impossible" speech? Any of 99 remaining senators or a handful of House members with similar high profiles could give it tomorrow.

They won't, because they'd be trading away a career's worth of wealth, power and prestige, in a battle of uncertain outcome, for the good of the country. That would take leadership.

Vin Suprynowicz is assistant editorial page editor of the daily Las Vegas Review-Journal and author of "The Black Arrow." See www.vinsuprynowicz.com/ and http://www.lvrj.com/blogs/vin/

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Leave Your Comment 63 Reader Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Current Word Count:

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

Report abuse

Dr. B. L. Baker wrote on October 23, 2009 01:35 AM: I'd like to send you an electronic copy of my new book: Tea Party Revival
for review and perhaps get an
endorsement from you.

Tea Party Revival: The Conscience of a Conservative Reborn, by Dr. B. Leland Baker, ISBN#978-1-4327-4917-0

Dr. B. L. Baker sets forth a brief manifesto in Tea Party Revival: The Conscience of a Conservative Reborn. It is written at a defining moment in history: the potential end of
the United States’ Superpower status due to America's experiments with Big Government growth, unconstrained spending, and disregard for the Constitution. Dr. Baker’s message
of adherence to the Constitution, is viewed as radical to Big Government politicians, but is considered common sense to members of the Tea Party movement. He argues for the value
and importance of constitutional principles--freedom, foremost among them--in contemporary political life. He explains how constitutional compliance leads to smaller,
limited government, which results in lower spending, lower taxes and greater freedom for all Americans. He explains how over-spending has placed our children and grandchildren in
fiscal bondage for the next century and answers “How did it come to this?” Using the principles as espoused in this concise but powerful book, Baker fundamentally explains
today’s political landscape, the concerns and demands of the Tea Party movement in clear and concise terms.


Report abuse

Paolo wrote on September 10, 2009 07:04 PM: As I knew would happen, my definition of terms of "free market" were used to present the usual socialist boilerplate argument that goes like this:

"Well, if PURE, ONE HUNDRED PERCENT LAISSEZ FAIRE CAPITALISM has never existed, then how can you say it would work?"

Answer: because, as reasoning beings, we can evaluate the results of economic freedom, even when it is not one hundred percent, "pure" free market.

We note that the relative prosperity of a society goes hand-in-hand with the amount of economic freedom that society has. We use logic and reason to arrive at the conclusion that economic freedom and prosperity must be related, mutually-reinforcing concepts.

On the other side, we can, as reasoning beings, note that socialism and poverty also go hand in hand. The Soviet Union, for example, with some of the richest are largest expanses of fertile farmland on the globe, never learned how to grow sufficient food for its own population. This was BECAUSE OF (not "despite") the fact that earnest, hard-working socialist planners told collective farmers exactly what to do.

An important paradox (not "contradiction") to learn is that CENTRAL PLANNING leads to CHAOS. The great Ludwig von Mises proved this in the 1920's. The socialist central planning countries proceeded to demonstrate his proof over the remaining 80 years of the century.

The assertion that you cannot evaluate a system, until you have it in some "pure" form, is epistemological nonsense.


Report abuse

Green Dragon Regular wrote on September 09, 2009 09:28 AM: @li'l "p"-

Ah, li'l "p", you don't like being cornered do you?

There was nothing terribly personal in my last response. A simple observation of your penultimate reply necessitated a criticism of it. Due to the adolescent nature of the rebuttal, I'm the one who should feel insulted, or at least my intelligence should. It quite honestly reminded me of the verbal white washes of frustration of the teen-aged debaters I once coached.

You can do better... or do I overestimate you?


Report abuse

Dave Lincoln wrote on September 09, 2009 07:29 AM: Patrick, I'm just telling the honest truth here - your posts illustrate the way of thinking of a true socialist. In that way, they back up Vin's articles, or at least the ones in which he tries to show a freedom-loving real American's view on a subject. Were Vin to give an example of the opposite, the Socialist way of feeling (instead of logical thinking), I don't think readers would believe him.

You come along and basically, in your silly posts, illustrate Vin's point as such: "Yes, this is how stupid we Socialists/Statists are. Believe it now or believe me later. We really think these things, our minds are truly this mushy. This is not a joke".

Vin could never make such a point himself without disbelief from the reader.


Report abuse

Bill Smith wrote on September 09, 2009 04:09 AM: I knew it would happen. I ask Patrick a legitimate question and he ALWAYS resorts to the ad hominem.


Report abuse

patrick wrote on September 08, 2009 08:54 PM: Dave:

Its funny you know how often people, like yourself (I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt here about the people thing) who reference something that is written, and although they never really offer any reasoned reply, they do manage to add some snide irrelevant something I suppose to "attach" their name to the post kind of like a leech attaches itself to the host.

So, there you go.

Bill:

And your "sure" that I do nothing because...

I'm assuming you're just as sure that there are big black helicopters outside your "home"; am I right?

Green:

I'm starting to lose hope my friend in our ability to carry out a reasoned conversation since your last couple of posts seem more intended to attack me, and not provide any real response to what I wrote.

I'm hoping this isn't a pattern, cause I really don't want to put you in the "other" category.


Report abuse

Dave Lincoln wrote on September 08, 2009 12:08 PM: Well, I for one, welcome our Patrick overlords...

OK, just tryin to be funny, but really, Patrick, I am glad you write your frequent comments to Vin's Sunday columns. You illustrate his points very well, every time your fingers move.

The mind of a socialist is a terrible thing to waste .... on logic and stuff.


Report abuse

Bill Smith wrote on September 08, 2009 04:31 AM: Patrick wrote: "My personal philosophy says that WE ARE our brothers keepers. We SHOULD do unto others as we would have others do unto us. These are not just words to me, and they don't stop at the door of any statehouse or Congressional Office."

I'm sure you do nothing for charity to help out your fellow man. But then again you are all for stealing wealth from others with force or threat of force to pay for more failed programs.Your true agenda is clearly seen by your very own words. Only an evil person supports theft and murder. Why do you Patrick?


Report abuse

dandan wrote on September 07, 2009 09:20 PM: Vin - excellent article. It sure would be nice is a real leader took up your Economic Freedom and Prosperity Restoration Act and did it for real, even if just for posterity. It's been years since I saw you in Westminster, Maryland. I hope you are doing well. I added you post to my information portfolio on PyraBang - The New Media! Hope it gets you some good traffic.
http://www.pyrabang.com/go/dandan/auto


Report abuse

Kurt Lehman wrote on September 07, 2009 03:23 PM: You're a brave soul, Vin.
But I agree with you and laughed out loud at many points in this week's column. I have forwarded it to many of my friends, including posting a link on my Facebook page.


Read All Comments