Home Subscribe Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Opinion


Barack Obama explains Yucca Mountain stance

To the editor:

In response to Erin Neff's Tuesday column, "Obama and Yucca":

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Most Popular Stories
  • EDITORIAL: McCain's VP
  • LETTERS: Values voters must turn to Democrats
  • LETTERS: If Sig Rogich likes Palin, be afraid
  • ERIN NEFF: GOP spins nice yarn about Palin
  • How dare the peasants question pay?
  • EDITORIAL: Verifying employment
  • LETTERS: Incumbents inherently incapable of change
  • LETTERS: Who will guard the guardians?
  • LETTERS: It's the economy, not the smoking law, stupid
  • EDITORIAL: Time to end 'use it or lose it'



  • I want every Nevadan to know that I have always opposed using Yucca Mountain as a nuclear waste repository, and I want to explain the many reasons why I've held that view.

    In my state of Illinois, we have faced our own issues of nuclear waste management. There are some who believe that Illinois should serve as a repository for nuclear waste from other states. My view on this subject was made clear in a 2006 letter to Sen. Pete Domenici, who at the time was chairman of the Senate Energy Committee. "States should not be unfairly burdened with waste from other states," I wrote. "Every state should be afforded the opportunity to chart a course that addresses its own interim waste storage in a manner that makes sense for that state."

    That is a position I hold to this day when it comes to both Illinois and Nevada.

    After spending billions of dollars on the Yucca Mountain Project, there are still significant questions about whether nuclear waste can be safely stored there. I believe a better short-term solution is to store nuclear waste on-site at the reactors where it is produced, or at a designated facility in the state where it is produced, until we find a safe, long-term disposal solution that is based on sound science.

    In the meantime, I believe all spending on Yucca Mountain should be redirected to other uses, such as improving the safety and security of spent fuel at plant sites around the country and exploring other long-term disposal options.

    There is no doubt that this is a difficult issue. But I believe our approach must be based on sound science above all else. I do not do the bidding of any special interest or industry, including the nuclear industry, which has a major presence in my state.

    In my own campaign, I have not accepted donations from political action committees or Washington lobbyists. In fact, I've often taken positions at odds with special interests. When I learned that radioactive tritium had leaked out of an Exelon nuclear plant in Illinois, I led an effort in the Senate to require utilities to notify the public of any unplanned release of radioactive substances.

    All Nevadans should know that as president, I will bring to this issue not just independent judgment and careful deliberation, but a personal appreciation that comes from my own experience of living in the back yard of hazardous nuclear materials. The safety and security of Nevadans and all Americans requires nothing less.

    Barack Obama

    WASHINGTON, D.C.

     

    The writer represents Illinois in the U.S. Senate and is seeking the Democratic presidential nomination.



    Leave Your Comment 2 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    ron bourgoin wrote on May 21, 2007 09:40 AM: The Illinois senator surely understands that spending on Yucca Mountain cannot be discontinued since the current motivation is to show Yucca Mountain safe for storage of nuclear waste. And if I read the senator correctly, once Yucca Mountain is pronounced safe, he'll support long-term storage there.


    artath_bet wrote on May 20, 2007 07:48 AM: This denial of being in the pockets of any any Washington lobbyists or political action committees is way too abstract. Obama has left himself lots of wiggle room with words that are more or less weasel words such as Believe. Well, we all believe something, but that doesn't necessarily make it so.

    This is just so much campaign blah, blah, blah.