Home subscribe manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

Opinion


LETTERS: Not all homeowners are being unrealistic

To the editor:

While letter writer Brad Evans is correct in saying that some homes on the market aren't worth $330,000 asking prices, there are sellers such as me who have reduced the prices of their homes far below $200,000 -- to no avail. My townhouse has been on the market for five months and is in excellent condition for the price of $175,000, as he suggested. I have offered incentives such as a 2006 vehicle or $10,000 for closing fees, etc. Still no takers.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Most Popular Stories
  • LETTERS: If we're going to reward irresponsibility ...
  • EDITORIAL: Good work, if you can get it
  • EDITORIAL: Simpson case is far from finished
  • VIN SUPRYNOWICZ: The biggest armed robbery in history
  • LETTERS: You paid PMI on your mortgage? Sucker!
  • LETTERS: Another proud moment for Congress
  • ERIN NEFF: The Big 60 looms large for Democrats
  • LETTERS: Sage grouse's worst enemy? The state
  • EDITORIAL: The second debate
  • LETTERS: Spend on classrooms, not consultants



  • Real estate prices shot up a few years ago because of low supply and high demand from the many Californians who came here to escape the horrendous real estate prices in their state. Many were investors who made a fortune because of Nevada's lower real estate prices. On the obverse side, many properties went into foreclosures when the real estate bubble did burst.

    Don't categorize homeowners as being greedy or unwilling to be realistic in their home pricing. I am very realistic.

    John Rago

    LAS VEGAS

    Energy bill

    To the editor:

    This month we celebrated the 231st anniversary of our independence as a nation. Unfortunately, we are not able to celebrate another independence -- freedom from our addiction to imported oil. A great part of that imported oil comes from some of the most volatile regions in the world -- the Middle East and Nigeria to name but two. Other large quantities come from countries with which we have a very contentious relationship -- Venezuela comes to mind. Our economy is dependent upon these imports, so in a sense our country is at risk unless we can reduce our dependence on imported oil.

    The recent action by the U.S. Senate in passing a sweeping energy bill is good news. One of its central features is a requirement to increase fuel efficiency in the vehicles we drive. In the 1970s, automobile fuel efficiency was less than 14 miles per gallon. Congress then passed Corporate Average Fuel Efficiency standards, known as CAFE standards, and within a decade the fuel average had doubled to 27.5 miles per gallon. By so doing we saved 1.5 million barrels of oil a day.

    As a newly elected senator in 1990, I introduced legislation to improve the CAFE standards. Unfortunately, political opposition by the U.S. auto industry and the United Auto Workers, contending that such legislation would cost jobs and market share for the American auto industry, carried the day and we were unsuccessful. If this legislation had been enacted, we would be saving an additional 2.5 million barrels of oil a day -- roughly what we currently import from the Middle East.

    As Sen. Harry Reid's former colleague, I want to commend him for his extraordinary leadership in securing Senate passage of this energy legislation. The same forces that defeated my legislation more than a decade ago were again at work trying to scuttle this energy bill. It is a testament to Sen. Reid's legislative prowess that he was able to overcome their opposition.

    Richard H. Bryan

    LAS VEGAS

    THE WRITER WAS GOVERNOR OF NEVADA FROM 1983-1989 AND REPRESENTED NEVADA IN THE U.S. SENATE FROM 1989-2001.

    Professional choice

    To the editor:

    Because more and more teachers in Clark County have expressed discontent with their representative unit, the Clark County Education Association, the Teamsters have decided to throw their hat in the ring.

    But the fact of the matter is neither the association nor the Teamsters is looking out for the best interests of teachers. Teachers are professionals who deserve a professional organization that will engender the type of respect and recognition that unions do not bring to the table. The Teamsters are no better a solution to the concerns of the teachers of Clark County than the association.

    The militant labor union mentality is inherently wrong for teachers. Industrial-style unionism neither advances the respect and compensation that educators deserve nor does it improve the quality of education for kids.

    Teachers have been tasked with the education of our nation's children, and must be the best and the brightest. The union model rewards teachers who act in a way that belies the nature of their profession. If teachers strive to be taken seriously as a profession, they need to align themselves with groups whose priorities do not center on political agendas that have little to do with the classroom.

    It's understandable that Clark County's educators are wondering if there are better options than a union. The answer is yes. In fact, there is a groundswell among America's teachers, who are leaving traditional teacher labor unions to join non-union professional associations. Nearly 300,000 teachers nationwide have opted to join non-union educators associations such as the Association of American Educators, which has members in all 50 states. Members can get most of the benefits that the unions provide but at a fraction of the cost.

    Clark County teachers have a unique opportunity to do what's best for their profession and for the kids they teach. There have indeed been problems with the Clark County Education Association's representation, and teachers should want change.

    However, the Teamsters outdated labor model is no more appropriate for today's teachers than is the National Education Association. Teachers deserve a professional choice.

    Gary Beckner

    MISSION VIEJO, CALIF.

    THE WRITER IS CHAIRMAN OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN EDUCATORS.



    Leave Your Comment 22 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Steve wrote on July 10, 2007 11:24 AM: Travis, you're quite welcome....I enjoy it too.... ;0)


    J wrote on July 10, 2007 09:52 AM: Unions breed a sense of entitlement rather than hard work. They create generations of workers who are dispassionate about their careers and passionate only about working under adversarial relationships they help to foster.


    Travis wrote on July 09, 2007 09:06 PM: Steve, you make me laugh. Thank you for the entertainment.


    WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot wrote on July 09, 2007 08:55 PM: Energy bill...yet another futile attempt by Congress to "reduce our dependence on foreign oil." If Congress really wants to affect a reduction, start allowing drilling where OUR oil is. Off shore. Alaska. It's time to tell the eco-whores where to stick it and start taking advantage of the resources we have in and around our own damn country.


    Steve wrote on July 09, 2007 08:18 PM: Travis, if you weren't so ignorant, you would see that I did NOT "ignore" anything. Learn to read and comprehend. It's quite obvious that you're a teacher....no other "profession" could have someone that stupid and illiterate. Perhaps you could take some "English as a second language" courses and perhaps, someday, you could understand what you read. I doubt it in your case, but just maybe......


    OurOwnOil wrote on July 09, 2007 07:08 PM: My dear Senator Bryan it is time for this country to abandon the FDR doctrine of "use their oil before using our own." Their oil is as good as gone. While your democratic friends were shoving the nuclear waste dump down our throats they were also recognizing the "sovereign rights" of California and voting against approving offshore drilling. You can't have it both ways. Tell your friend Harry Reid to lessen our dependence on foreign oil by increasing drilling at home!


    Investor wrote on July 09, 2007 07:03 PM: To writer John Rago: If your condo is not selling at its current price, then you are (still) asking too much.


    Travis wrote on July 09, 2007 06:11 PM: Steve, you continue to prove your ignorance of fact. Unions have been shown to be corrupt, corporations have shown to be corrupt. I'll take the lesser of two evils, I'll side with the union. If it wasn't for unions, as Doug stated and you ignored, we would be working a 70 hour work week for minimal wages. You enjoy the benefits unions brought, but don't hesitate to spout off rhetoric against them. The same group that enjoys the many benefits science has brought, but still doubt evolution.

    There is no help for people like you.


    Beytovin wrote on July 09, 2007 04:29 PM: Wow. I thought I was getting ripped off when I bought my 1800 s.f. house for $145,000. Timing is everything...


    Steve wrote on July 09, 2007 03:59 PM: Douglas (you don't have to list the "Democrat" part...it's TOTALLY obvious):

    Unions USED (that's past tense) to be useful. I have done PLENTY of "research". That's how I KNOW that unions are destroying this country. I will buy everything from a foreign country and pay a LOT more for it rather than purchase ANY piece of garbage made by a union. All unions do is destroy businesses. Soon, if these criminals are allowed to continue unchecked, there won't be any businesses left to hire workers.


    Read All Comments