Home subscribe manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

Opinion


LETTERS: Arts district gets no respect from city

To the editor:

The people in the downtown Las Vegas arts district are learning a lesson when it comes to business in Las Vegas: money talks.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Most Popular Stories
  • ERIN NEFF: Sarah Palin: It's just wrong
  • EDITORIAL: Risky loans
  • EDITORIAL: Good work, if you can get it
  • VIN SUPRYNOWICZ: The biggest armed robbery in history
  • LETTERS: Crushing freedom for the 'greater good'
  • LETTERS: Sage grouse's worst enemy? The state
  • LETTERS: Bill must hold CEOs accountable
  • EDITORIAL: VP debate unlikely to change minds
  • LETTERS: Consumers deserve another stimulus check
  • EDITORIAL: What funding crisis?



  • As I have lived in Las Vegas, I have learned that nothing is forever -- districts, streets, buildings, anything. Street names change, buildings are destroyed and districts (even districts the city drew) change. Nothing is sacred in this city.

    It's best for the people in the arts district to move to a city where things truly matter and are held safe no matter what. Money talks in this valley. If a developer wants a street name changed, it's changed. If a developer wants a district changed, it's changed. If a developer doesn't want to improve traffic flow, he doesn't have to. If a developer doesn't want to build an arena on an already vacant piece of land, he doesn't have to.

    It makes me sad to say this, but Las Vegas will never truly be a real city. It will never have a professional sports team -- and even if it does, no one will support it because most of the people who live here are from somewhere else and they support their hometown teams.

    Las Vegas will never have a world-class zoo, aquarium, museum, transportation system, etc. The list could go on and on.

    I have lived in Las Vegas for more than 20 years, and it seems the city (including unincorporated Clark County) has always been striving to be world-class. But being world-class has more to do with making it a place people want to live as opposed to just visit.

    The only reason people live here (and I am guilty as well) is for money. I make good money with relatively little college education, otherwise I would have left long ago.

    The arts district is just another victim of business as usual in the city that isn't really a city.

    Cody Straub

    LAS VEGAS

    Land deals

    To the editor:

    Thank you for your "Trust must be earned" commentary and "The public doesn't need to worry" editorial, both in the July 1 Review-Journal. Again, you hit the nail on the head regarding local land deals and the downtown arena plan.

    After carefully reading and digesting both articles, it came to mind that most of the taxpaying public is not fully aware of the government Request For Proposal (RFP) process. What I am suggesting is that the Review-Journal prepare a sort of primer regarding this process to better inform the public. I have taken the liberty of asking the following questions based on my experience as noted below, plus having written many articles on the subject.

    How extensively was the RFP advertised? How many proposals were received? From what parts of the country/world did the proposals originate? What were the guidelines defining parameters of the responders? How were these guidelines formed? Were they biased to favor only certain companies? Who evaluated the proposals to eventually arrive at a "short" list?

    I was manager of contracts for several billion-dollar projects worldwide. For public bidding, our evaluation procedures were transparent.

    Please keep the light bright on this very important project.

    Anthony Stephen

    LAS VEGAS

    Stephens platform

    To the editor:

    I was thinking the other day what I would do if I were running for president. What would be my goals and the programs to accomplish those goals? Here they are:

    1. Jobs with livable pay -- $5 an hour is not livable, $15 an hour should be the minimum wage -- and homes for all.

    2. Instead of jails and prisons, we'd have recovery centers. And a program for every kind of mental illness. People who commit crimes are not mentally well. Instead of guards and jailors, we'd have counselors and psychiatrists. Then, on the outside, support groups like Alcoholics Anonymous would be mandated.

    3. Stop cocaine and crack from coming into this nation. People in high places of power are making money off of the misery and genocide of the colored people in this country. This would also reduce crime by more than 50 percent.

    4. Tax reconstruction. No more loopholes, deductions or anything else. A simple system, deducted from wages. Or in case of self-owned business, a percentage of profits would have to be sent in. No more filing except for self-owned business. The IRS just keeps everything that is deducted. For example: Anything over $250,000 goes to the IRS; wages between $200,000 and $249,000 would be taxed at 10 percent; those from $150,000 to $199,999 at 5 percent; between $100,000 and $149,999 at 2.5 percent; and earnings under $100,000 at 1 percent.

    5. Free education should be compulsory through two years of college or trade school. College expands your mind much past what high school can do. It can create open-minded, tolerant, thinking people.

    There is my program. I want peace and happiness for myself, my city, my country and my world. There should be a law against greed.

    I am a teacher. I taught in the Los Angeles hood for 18 years. I am now teaching in a poverty neighborhood in Las Vegas. The devastating effects of poverty and drugs I have dealt with for 21 years. I don't want to deal with the effects anymore. I want to eliminate them.

    The rich people are getting richer (though poorer in spirit) and the poor people are getting poorer. That needs to be stopped.

    sharon stephens

    LAS VEGAS



    Leave Your Comment 20 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Mr. Justice wrote on August 10, 2007 04:39 PM: Brian,
    A reasonable definition of satire is "a literary manner which blends a critical attitude with humor and wit to the end that human institutions or humanity may be improved." Sharon's letter had neither wit nor humor. Nor common sense for that matter. I believe Sharon was sincere, not sarcastic.

    Nothing in Sharon's letter was funny. It was rather sad, as Sharon's fuzzy illogic is emblematic of teachers in general, who, it has been said, along with journalists, consistently receive the lowest grades in school.

    Those who can do, those who can't teach.


    Bill Schoen wrote on August 10, 2007 02:30 PM: Sharon,

    You're a prime example why I'll be sending my daughter to a private school. Why teach our children how to be successful in school if there's no reason for them to BE successful in life? You'd have them making 15 bucks an hour for doing some brain-dead job that even if they did manage to screw up due to their own poor choices in life, they can just blame someone else, get a government bailout and then check into rehab with Lindsay or Paris to make them all better.

    Plus, what would the incentive be for taking an idea like the telephone, automobile or airplane and running with it? Do you think people push their businesses to greatness or invent things SOLELY for the greater good of humanity? Do you think that the computer you use everyday would have ever been invented if Bill Gates knew he could only keep 250 grand of the profit for starting Microsoft?

    We're a superpower because we are DREAMERS and DOERS, not because the government sees fit to give us just enough of an allowance to keep us fat, dumb and happy. People like you are trying to change that, though through your campaign of teaching personal IRRESPONSIBILITY.

    By the way, I'm sorry for calling you a socialist. I meant to call you a communist.


    Whiskey Tango Foxtrot wrote on August 10, 2007 02:25 PM: The only person I hear whining that Las Vegas isn't a world-class city is our gin-swilling mayor when he's in his "we need a pro team" mode. Las Vegas is a tourist town, pure and simple. As for world-class, very few cities in the world have the name recognition that Las Vegas has. We don't need zoos, aquariums or museums. We have gambling and shows. Besides, what good will all the above be when the water situation worsens to critical and strict rationing is imposed? Sucking the rural counties dry for a few more years of unrestricted growth will do NOTHING but increase the effect of the draconian water restrictions that will be needed.


    jk wrote on August 10, 2007 01:20 PM: Sharon your views do a very good job of summing up what is wrong with the public education system, which is people such as yourself are hired to teach. If you are so enamored with communism why don't you head over to China or Cuba to teach, or better yet your 'hood in the land of fruits and nuts to our west.

    As for your second point, there is a much easier solution, it is called target practice, Mr .45 would be more than happy to relieve these idiots in jail of all their problems.

    Have you ever thought about why/how the poor got poor in the first place ? The reason is they are lazy, uneducated, make bad decisions, and have no motivation other than asking for a government hand-out.


    DJ wrote on August 10, 2007 12:30 PM: The difference between Christianity and Communism is that theoretically the benevolent changes for societal's ultimate good are brought about by two opposing perspectives.

    While true Christianity believes that when the inner man sincerely changes, he will, in turn, change his own behaviors and by so-doing, ultimately change his society to reflect his altruistic views, Communism is the forced imposition of a "more compassionate" system on all humankind.

    Theoretically, genuine Christianity should involve voluntary compassion emanating from the inside out, while Communism works from the outside in, forcing "compassionate" behaviors on the individual and society without changing the underlying deficits of character that fueled the majority of cruelly unfair inequities in the first place.

    It must also be remembered that genuine freedom allows for the freedom to fail along with the freedom to succeed, the freedom to be selfish and the freedom to be generous, the freedom to be a productive citizen and the freedom to be a predator. However, real consequences always follow those choices. As long as that principle holds true, there will always be vast differences between the members of a free society.


    JL wrote on August 10, 2007 12:03 PM: I have to totally agree with Cody's letter. This isn't really a city. A city supports the arts. This city supports nothing that doesn't attract the tourists who visit simply to gamble. We can't even have a full-length Broadway show here because of the casino's mindset that 90 minutes is the longest they will allow the show to run. Back to the casino, kiddies.

    Oh, and David before you get your blue-collar up, I do support the arts community by volunteering in it. I do visit Red Rock (that's not really part of the arts, you know that, right? Riiight.) I have gone to community theater--what little there is of it. But we will never be a world class city and that's due to the mindset of the population and its elected officials. I will not leave because you tell me to. That's just a silly, illogical statement.


    Brian wrote on August 10, 2007 11:12 AM: To MIke, Mr. Justice, Patte, etc.:

    You guys need more education. You don't understand what SATIRE is, do you? I suggest you all go back to school and pay attention this time.


    Emily wrote on August 10, 2007 11:10 AM: Sharon Stephens in '08!


    Jen wrote on August 10, 2007 11:08 AM: Sharon, May I be your running mate?


    Mike wrote on August 10, 2007 10:33 AM: Regarding Ms. Stephens letter with the most twisted logic I have ever read, the school district should require that all teachers have to take basic economics and early American history to become a licensed teacher. This person has no business teaching youngsters as there is simply no way that she could possibly motivate them, nor teach them personal responsibility. I can't even count how many things are wrong with her logic. I want her out and will file a complaint against her with the school district. I hope others will follow that example. We need teachers who motivate and not those who want to perpetuate a victim mentality into our children. Hey, Sharon, since you want to "outlaw greed", how about outlawing "jealousy", "laziness", "thinking","speaking", etc. But then, what would be your punishment for violating the law?....oh, yeah, rehab! Truly, the dumbest letter I've ever seen.


    Read All Comments