Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - Opinion

Tuesday
Mar 16, 2010
Mostly Clear
Mostly Clear 63° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

Opinion


NOT LEAVING NEVADA BEHIND: Making education a priority

When presidential candidates pass through Las Vegas, they should be asked to explain what they'll do to help kids prepare to compete in the world economy

For the most part, what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas, except smart Nevada teens who win National Merit scholarships and promptly leave for out-of-state colleges. That's unfortunate but not surprising. Does anyone dispute that Nevada has one of the weakest higher education systems in the country?

Probably not. Until a couple of years ago, Nevada essentially ran an open admissions university system. That rarely works out. The recent push to require students to earn a B-average in high school to win a seat at a state university struggled because ... well, because that appeared to be a reach. Can you imagine such a debate in Virginia, Michigan or North Carolina?


Most Popular Stories
  1. Today's kids aren't the kids of 30 years ago
  2. Heat on Titus
  3. Big government is here to protect us all
  4. Facing the music



And even if you earned a B-average in Nevada schools, what would that predict? Among those accepted to Nevada universities, roughly four in 10 end up taking remedial classes in either math or English.

Wait, you say. All this can be explained by the powerful draw of a tourism industry that siphons off our bright sons and daughters before they have a chance to earn a college degree.

Perhaps, but times are changing, cautions MGM Mirage's Alan Feldman, referring to the massive CityCenter, which will employ 12,000 workers when it opens in 2009. Sure, you can clean rooms or park cars without a degree, but don't think of working your way past the first rung of management without a college degree. The front desk workers, the restaurant managers, the maitre d' -- nearly all college graduates.

So there you have it. Vegas has gone upscale. Turns out young Nevadans do need degrees.

Another reality check: Most of your sons and daughters won't end up card dealers or car parkers. They'll compete for the jobs in the global economy with the rest of us. That means Nevada has to ramp up its education system sharply in the coming years. Compared to other states, Nevada currently ranks 49th in college enrollment and 46th in the percent of the population holding a bachelor's degree.

This is worrisome, you're thinking. But it's really a local and state issue. And it's certainly not connected to the '08 presidential entourages passing through town because Nevada is an early caucus state. No need to quiz those candidates about education.

Allow me to respectfully suggest you're wrong there.

In September 1989, the nation's governors met in Charlottesville, Va., to map out a national school reform strategy. Since then, everything has changed.

In recent years, the best ideas in education, from how to design effective preschools to making public universities accountable for spending our tuition money wisely, have flowed from the national level, including national foundations. No Child Left Behind is just the most visible part of this trend.

And that national flavoring makes sense. After all, algebra is pretty much the same from California to Maine. Sharing lessons across state lines about what works makes sense.

So what have the '08 candidates been saying about education reform that would affect your children in Nevada? Not much worth mentioning. We know the Democrats like preschools and the Republicans like vouchers. For the most part, that is. Everybody dislikes No Child Left Behind, but nobody's sure how to replace it.

Surely, there's a better way here.

The Education Writers Association, a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization of education writers from around the country, has invited all the candidates to sit down with us, one at a time, at a studio offered by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, conveniently located right across from the White House. We'd like to press them a bit on their plans. Politely, of course, but still press them. To date, no takers.

As a counterweight to their silence, we've started a blog about the candidates and education. We have some of the sharpest education writers in the country honing in on individual candidates. Feel free to dip in and take a look: http://edelection.blogspot.com/. We'll try to make sense of the bits and pieces they utter.

But we need your help. Next time they pass through town, ask what they'd do to help your children compete in the world economy, giving them a shot at something beyond valet parking. (Yes, I know the tips are great.)

We'll keep track of everything they tell you. And maybe in the end, if it all works out for the best, more of those Nevada National Merit Scholars will hang around Nevada a bit longer.

Richard Whitmire is an editorial writer for USA Today and the president of the Education Writers Association.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Leave Your Comment 9 Reader Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Current Word Count:

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

Report abuse

Stefanie wrote on September 11, 2007 04:58 AM: It seems the RJ is always finding flaws with the school system instead of finding ways to support the district and the community it serves. I am proud to say I attended high school in Las Vegas, received 3 degrees, including my doctorate from UNLV, and spent 10.5 years teaching for CCSD. I know I got a top rate education and was given opportunities I would not have had elsewhere.
I left Las Vegas to relocate to my husband's home state of Michigan and have spent the majority of the time regretting it. At least in Vegas, my daughter would have had access to technology in the schools, exposure to more diverse populations, and curriculum/standards that made sense for kids.
Further, it may appear there is a low college attendance rate and few folks get degrees but let's not forget to mention how many people in the city are transplants from other places or countries. How many are mastering their second language as well? If one of ten students require remedial college courses it would be more accurate to identify where the majority of their educational roots stem from. Albeit, one would find many of these students are products from other places (states/countries) who have not prepared their students adequately.
Nevada isn’t the only place who has this problem. To say these aren’t issues the next president shouldn’t be concerned with for the country as a whole is ignorant. If we can’t prepare all our young people for the rigors of higher education and support them adequately in their pursuit of degrees, how will they be able to secure employment and sustainable income in the 21st century? If these students fail, we, as a nation, have failed all our children.


Report abuse

Dick Swift wrote on September 10, 2007 03:01 PM: A child, correctly parented in the first three years, will not only thrive on learning but, loving learning, will teach himself with only prompting and help from adults. They will be the innovators. The child poorly parented during those three years will forever need strong adult stimulation and remedial help. They will be the stragglers...the needy. They will have no bootstraps with which to pull themselves up since their brain-systems were not optimally formatted during the vital first three years. The physiological opportunity simply does not endure beyond ages three or four.

Some in government have given lip-service to the importance of parenting, yet few really recognize its true importance; that early parenting is integral to brilliance. Leave No Child Behind is actually leaving children behind. It’s the catch-up game. (Catch up from what? A poor start.) The program stresses Remedial-Ed beyond age 4. It force-feeds those who missed out on good parenting in the first three years of life. Leave No Child Behind is a wasteland of resources. Leave No Child Behind is the surge mentality attempting to remedy that which cannot be remedied...the already formatted neural system.

The truth is, if no child gets behind...no child will be left behind.

In 50 years America may still be floundering amid a crowd of mediocre countries. We may find ourselves in the muddle of equalized nations all competing for markets and survival. Isn’t America already losing its greatness?

Familiarize yourselves with Before4— a program that can seed better parenting and parenting awareness in every city, county and state in America, at an astonishingly small price. We can (must) increase the Brilliant and decrease the Remedial.

Better parenting first — better schools will follow.

To get your state moving, contact:
Richard Swift
rezoom1@aol.com


Report abuse

GEORGE MOSS wrote on September 10, 2007 03:53 AM: National Merit scholars may leave Nevada to go to school but they will have to return here to find jobs. The Department of Labor job projections for the future say that only 6 percent of future jobs will require a college degree. Diplomas guarantee jobs for the school bureaucrats not the students.


Report abuse

patte wrote on September 09, 2007 04:55 PM: Eliminate the public schools, the teachers union, and give people vouchers for online schools with online tutoring. Watch our scores soar!!
Of course, parents would be responsible for babysitting their kids instead of giving the job to the government.


Report abuse

Mark Wilson wrote on September 09, 2007 04:31 PM: Our education system produces more and more dumbed-down drones, courtesy of the left-wing fringe of the Democrats and Republicans and their support of the worthless teacher unions.

On a bright note: at least the Democrats have their dumbed-down, guaranteed voting block.

Mark Wilson


Report abuse

Jeremiah wrote on September 09, 2007 02:34 PM: There has never been any research that suggests competition would be good for schools. In fact, the opposite is more often true. Competion would mean that my school’s success would depend on another’s failure. What would you use as a barometer, test scores? Please. Those are useful only for telling us about one's socioeconomic status, nothing more.

When I have a vested interest in the failure of another school or classroom, how does that make me successful as a professional educator? My interest should be in the success of all students, not just mine. I would be like a salesperson yelling “scoreboard” when my name is on top of the board, and my colleague’s is not. When schools compete based on achievement tests, who wins? Nobody does. Who loses? The students do.


Report abuse

Dolores Mason wrote on September 09, 2007 11:01 AM: I hate when the media puts down education in Nevada. It is not the worst in the country. I know first hand because I have seen how education is going on in other states both through being a teacher and as a prior student. The problem is all the states should be on the same page and require the same curriculum across the board from K-12. Students should be required to think for themselves and not just rely on a computer to spit out information. How about making students learn to write cursive from 3rd grade and up and helping the students use the calculator between their ears instead of punching buttons ( besides calculators are not permitted on all testing ). If we just want to become an automated world why don't we just insert a computer chip into our children when they're born and they will already know everything and we will not have to send them to school. We can dispense with elementary, secondary and universities systems and save money. Government and society have to remember people give life to humans and humans are the important part of passing on learning to other humans and like the saying goes "Rome wasn't built in a day", and neither are students. Remember machines can short circut or blow up, people can relearn and regroup not all just alike and at the same pace but with time. I believe in technology and using it but not at the expense of forgetting the technology we are all born with ( our brains). I graduated from High School and UNLV in Nevada ( proud of it )and compared to the students I see graduating out of our schools today, my generation back in the 80's is still ahead. Remember Common Sense.


Report abuse

Brian wrote on September 09, 2007 09:55 AM: Hey MIke,

This isn't Europe. Here in the U.S., education is a right. In other countries it is a privilege. If students in other countries don't perform, they are out. Here we are forced to keep them. Show me a parent who cares about his or her daughter's or son's education, and I will show a student who is doing well in school. It is NOT the school's fault when students don't do well.


Report abuse

Mike K. wrote on September 09, 2007 09:05 AM: How about we get rid of the current education system and instead inject competition into our educational system as they do in some European countries. The tax dollars that we blindly dump into our failing public schools everyone complains about, and instead attach the dollars to the student. If the parents choose to send them to a private school then the money goes there. If a public school starts to make the grade, then parents will send their children there and the money will follow. This is not a novel idea, but something that is better than the current system that is failing our children.