Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Opinion


GLENN COOK: A quiet boom in the housing market

With record unemployment, forecasts of fiscal doom from the political class and the ridicule of think tanks and pundits everywhere, you'd think Las Vegas would be the last place anyone would put his money.

But if this valley's economy is going the way of Detroit's, why are thousands of investors rushing into town to bet some of their fortunes on a recovery?


Most Popular Stories
  • VIN SUPRYNOWICZ: What stops mass murderers? A gun
  • SHERMAN FREDERICK: Call evil by its rightful name
  • EDITORIAL: Terrorism on trial
  • EDITORIAL: A pre-9/11 approach to terror
  • LETTERS: Public-sector workers are still doing well
  • LETTERS: Harry Reid: Working hard for all Americans
  • EDITORIAL: They took our jobs!
  • EDITORIAL: 'That's the ticket!'
  • Our politicians are the greatest, all right
  • EDITORIAL: I believe in free speech, but ...




  • Whatever action is lacking in Strip casinos has shifted to the housing market, with cash buyers snapping up hundreds of single-family homes every week.

    In many ways, the local real estate scene is every bit as frenzied as it was in 2003 and 2004, with buyers engaged in bidding wars, properties going into escrow a day or two after being listed, and Realtors and title companies emptying voice mail boxes hourly. In October, there were more than 3,500 home sales, a 5.3 percent increase from September and nearly triple the activity of just 21/2 years ago.

    The differences between today and five years ago, however, are sobering. Sellers aren't getting rich, and buyers aren't commando "flippers" expecting rapid appreciation. Two-thirds of the homes sold are bank-owned properties, with short sales -- homes sold for less than what lenders are owed -- becoming more and more common. The median resale price climbed less than 1 percent last month to $139,100, according to the Greater Las Vegas Association of Realtors.

    For many foreclosure-ravaged neighborhoods, the distress of watching vacant houses fall into disrepair and finally be sold for one-half to one-third of what they fetched a few years ago is being replaced by anxiety that renters will soon be moving in up and down the street.

    It's hard to say the housing market has stabilized -- let alone that it's rebounding -- when Deutsche Bank estimates that 81 percent of the valley's mortgages are underwater, and that by 2011, as many as 90 percent of borrowers will owe more than their homes are worth. The local unemployment rate, already at a surreal 13.9 percent, is expected to go higher next year. More job losses certainly will lead to more foreclosures.

    And yet this valley's real estate agents are throwing out above-list-price bids from well-to-do clients as soon as foreclosed properties are thrown on the market.

    "When the bank-owned properties list, you'd better have your offer in on Day One, or you're done," said Andrea Harris of Coldwell Banker Premier Realty.

    "There are more buyers, more sales, record-low interest rates and low prices. It's a perfect storm, really," she said.

    There are so many investors racing to buy foreclosed homes that banks can't keep up with demand. Month by month, the number of foreclosures sold in the valley is exceeding the number of foreclosures added to the housing inventory. As foreclosures make up a smaller and smaller share of resale properties, the less their discounted prices will impact home values. That's one reason why, at least for now, home prices seem to have bottomed out.

    This housing mini-boom isn't making much noise around the valley because so few people are part of it. In the middle of this decade, you couldn't walk through a grocery store or sweat in the gym for five minutes without overhearing someone talk about how much his home had appreciated. Today, nearly everyone is stuck in a house they can't sell or fighting to keep up with payments.

    So why should the average Las Vegan be excited that investors are back in the game?

    For starters, because most of these buyers are paying cash, there's no chance their properties will be foreclosed yet again -- there's no loan to default. Second, these new owners plan to keep their houses as long as it takes to get a good return on their investment. That shows incredible confidence in a city so many are willing to declare dead.

    Think about that: Thousands of investors believe Las Vegas will maintain enough of an employment base to supply renters for their homes, and that in five or 10 years' time, home prices will appreciate to the point that they can sell their properties for a solid profit, if they so desire.

    They could buy homes and land at depressed prices just about anywhere. Last month, at an auction in Detroit, hundreds of properties were offered for a minimum bid of $500 but had no takers. Many homes sold for less than $20,000. The cheapest house isn't necessarily the best deal.

    Another group of investors -- homebuilders -- also sees great value in Las Vegas real estate. The Review-Journal reported this month that major builders are buying finished lots in master-planned communities from their bankrupt or hibernating competitors. They're convinced that one day soon they'll again be able to make money building new houses here.

    The coming few years will present a lot of obstacles to a full recovery. Banks are holding back many thousands of foreclosures, and they're taking months to process -- and in most cases, reject -- short sales. A national survey of real estate executives by the Urban Land Institute and PricewaterhouseCoopers released last week predicted a commercial real estate crash in 2010, and it ranked Las Vegas second to last among 50 major markets for anticipated commercial investment and development. Any number of other economic setbacks could scare away the valley's crush of eager home buyers.

    Like tax increases. Tax hikes at the state and federal level, especially those that feed class warfare by targeting "the rich," will discourage all kinds of investment. Michigan answered hard times with tax increases, which led to more hard times, which led to more tax increases ...

    If Nevada follows that path, Detroit will start looking better every day.

    Glenn Cook (gcook@reviewjournal.com) is a Review-Journal editorial writer.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 13 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Fair and Balanced Fred wrote on November 15, 2009 11:08 PM: "Vegas Quixote wrote on November 15, 2009 07:56 PM: Why does the RJ sound more like ad copy than investigative reporting?"

    When did the Las Vegas Republicon-Journal EVER sound less like ad copy than investigative reporting?

    When?


    Vegas Quixote wrote on November 15, 2009 07:56 PM: Why does the RJ sound more like ad copy than investigative reporting? On 10-20-09, foreclosure.com reported 23,677 homes in pre-foreclosure, 15,687 in foreclosure, 9,472 bankruptcies, and 3,346 sheriff's sales. On 11-14-09, the same website reported 23,577 pre-foreclosures, 15,473 foreclosures, 9,483 bankruptcies, and 2,537 sheriff's sales. Hardly a dramatic change. Economists predict a second wave of foreclosures in Las Vegas during the first half of 2010.


    Con Sense wrote on November 15, 2009 07:01 PM: Uber negative Con Sense believes it's its job to inform us of just how bad everything is, maintaining it is smarter than we are. Do you believe Con Sense is smarter than you are? It does.

    I don't believe the Pollyanna real estate prognostications of the R-J and other people who make their living selling real property, nor do I believe the bitter, uber negative, crystal ball prognostications of Cons Sense who has a tarantula-sized bug up its backside.

    Please now, Con Sense.

    Insult me.


    Anna wrote on November 15, 2009 02:38 PM: Oh, Cook, you were doing so good right up to the last two paragraphs!

    Cook, please move to the only state that has a lower state/local tax hit; Alaska.

    I agree with the poster who says commons sense is a moron. What investor would bet their last dollar on a sure loser?! common sense is a moron, proving that enough monkeys with a keyboard can produce a sentence.


    M A R wrote on November 15, 2009 01:20 PM: Wonderful, investors purchase a home at fire sale prices, rent the home to white trash who promptly move in twelve of their relatives, park a junk car in the front yard and mores cars in the driveway and trash the place. The out of state owner dosen't care as long as he gets the rent. Sure helps property values in my neighborhood and makes it a safer place live. This is so much crap and is a finger in the eye of all the home owners who played by the rules and purchased homes they could afford. The middle class is growing tired of all this nonscense and when they have had enough their will be hell to pay for both political parties!


    Yeah, and were the chumps wrote on November 15, 2009 12:14 PM: Yeah, and were the chumps. A friend of mine got one of the homes. 20 grand thru forclosure.

    Rents if out. Makes more than enough to make his primary home house payment plus some.

    A house in back of us went for 49 grand.

    But, my property taxes have risen. I DON'T EXPECT THEM TOO go lower, always up, up, up.

    We lost 1/2 the value of our home. Were the chumps.

    The governmental bodies here never cease needing more money. More money, more money, more money.




    SamT wrote on November 15, 2009 12:08 PM: @Common Sense: Dead-on!

    My all-time favorite: "There is never negative growth in housing..."

    Houses are commodities, nothing more, nothing less, despite RE industry canards.


    . wrote on November 15, 2009 10:38 AM: http://transparentnevada.com/salaries/search/?name=&title=fire&year=0&jurisdiction=3&sort_by=T#results


    Common Sense wrote on November 15, 2009 08:48 AM: "Con Sense is negative, negative, negative"

    Psycho, you wouldn't happen to work in the real estate industry, would you?

    Housing prices have been "negative, negative, negative" for years, and I've been correct, correct, correct about them for years.

    In contrast, realtors have been positive, positive, positive about house prices throughout the crash, yet they've been wrong every time.

    Why do you offer no scathing indictment of them? Probably because you ARE one!

    Here are a few examples of realtor wisdom:

    January 2005: Marta Borsanyi, founder of The Concord Group, said “There is never negative growth in housing. We all need a roof over our head.”

    November 2006: "The worst is behind us as far as a market correction," said David Lereah, The Realtors' chief economist.

    October 2007: "The time to buy is now, because the market can't get lower." Tommy Hong, Liberty Realty

    January 2008: "National Association of Realtors report shows market rebounding"

    November 2008: "This is a great time to buy real estate." GLVAR President Sue Naumann


    Psychopath Con, No Sense wrote on November 15, 2009 08:33 AM: "But if this valley's economy is going the way of Detroit's, why are thousands of investors rushing into town to bet some of their fortunes on a recovery?"

    One reason: Unlike Detroit and other parts of the country, Las Vegas residents have no need to purchase a snow shovel.

    One thing I've learned about Con Sense posting here, it is consistently negative and thinks it is some kind of economic forecaster with a negative crystal ball. Con Sense is negative, negative, negative, and has some kind of perverse psycho-pathological need to broadcast its negativity here. Why? Why? What is it achieving?

    Sorry you're so angry, Con Sense. Why might that be?


    Read All Comments