Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Opinion


LETTERS: Buy American

Tariffs on tires a good move by the president

To the editor:

Coincidentally enough, I just purchased new tires for my SUV a couple of days before the levying of tariffs against the Chinese for dumping below-cost tires in the United States.


Most Popular Stories
  • VIN SUPRYNOWICZ: What stops mass murderers? A gun
  • SHERMAN FREDERICK: Call evil by its rightful name
  • EDITORIAL: Terrorism on trial
  • EDITORIAL: A pre-9/11 approach to terror
  • LETTERS: Public-sector workers are still doing well
  • LETTERS: Harry Reid: Working hard for all Americans
  • EDITORIAL: 'That's the ticket!'
  • Our politicians are the greatest, all right
  • EDITORIAL: I believe in free speech, but ...
  • EDITORIAL: They took our jobs!




  • As a former manufacturing engineer, I have attempted to buy American where possible. I believe that as a nation, we must process raw materials into products that people want to buy to maintain a high standard of living. If we continue to give up our manufacturing base to other parts of the world, how will we as a people be able to create wealth to support our quality of life?

    Certainly a Wall Street Ponzi scheme was not and is not the answer. Nor is the reliance on health care as an industry -- after all, someone has to pay for all these services by creating wealth.

    But I digress from tires. As I shopped around several stores, I realized that tires are one of the few commodities where the American shopper has real choice when it comes to the country of manufacture. I found many fine brands made in the United States, some in Italy, some in Japan, and many in China. I further found that relying on brand names was not meaningful in determining where the tire was made, so I really had to look at the tire itself to determine its origin.

    In the end I found a nice set of long-wearing tires that were priced competitively and made in the United States. I bought them and am pleased with the decision. I only wish I had the option of "buying American" more often, as I find it extremely depressing to go clothes or electronics shopping and literally find nothing made in our country.

    I support the decision to level the playing field, and hope we do not back down to the Chinese for their unfair trading practices. When we hold our industries to high standards of worker safety, environmental responsibility, employee health and retirement programs, we can't allow offshore competitors to destroy our way of life by simply eliminating these costs.

    Tariffs are a useful tool to correct these inequities.

    Jack Pestaner

    LAS VEGAS

    'Shall make no law'

    To the editor:

    In response to the letter by Ed Garcia concluding: "Of course, I would defend both the Review-Journal and Chuck Muth's First Amendment right to say what they please -- as long as they follow the law while they do it."

    Mr. Garcia decries the fact that Mr. Muth, a political consultant, is attempting to send a message through a prohibited printed name of his political action committee. Mr. Garcia misses the law, the point, the logic and the First Amendment to the Constitution.

    Here's what the Constitution says: "Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press ... " The title Mr. Muth chooses sends a message, is written and communicated, and is thusly speech. A law that prohibits the message indisputably abridges speech. The assertion that the First Amendment protects Mr. Muth's position is established.

    In this respect, I wish to make two points.

    First, the First Amendment does not protect any class of persons or entities. It protects speech. Not speech of persons, not speech of citizens, and not speech of corporations -- just speech. For those who would say an entity does not have speech rights, everything and everyone has speech rights. Speech is protected in the same sense as the press is protected, and no one should say that the content of Time magazine or the Review-Journal can be legislatively limited merely because a media corporation owns them.

    The second point goes more directly to Mr. Garcia's thesis -- "say anything as long as what you say is legal." But it is legal. The simple and missed point is that the exercise of a protected constitutional right, regardless of any statute, law, or dictate of some petty despot with a government position, cannot be a crime. The circularity of Mr. Garcia's point is evident, and he cedes to Congress the authority to abridge the Constitution, and that once a law is made, even if void, it must be followed.

    Final to this issue: If Mr. Garcia's point were accepted, then the world turns upside down. Pointedly, a law prohibiting a constitutionally protected activity is no law whatsoever, and those in government who pass or prosecute such laws are violating their oath to protect and defend the Constitution.

    Robert Nersesian

    LAS VEGAS

    No fat?

    To the editor:

    Richard Lake's Wednesday article "Budget cuts not over yet" details UNLV President Neal Smatresk's concern about more budget cuts needed to address current and future funding shortfalls.

    Meanwhile, comments from Keith Schwer, the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research at UNLV, in Benjamin Spillman's Thursday article, "Sandoval: Key to state budget fiscal restraint," reveal that he is apparently concerned that Brian Sandoval, as governor, might seek more UNLV budget cuts. "I guess what he is proposing is he wants to fire people," Mr. Schwer says. "How many firemen and how many policemen does he want to fire? How many children are not going to have a teacher in front of them?"

    I'm not a yet an advocate of Brian Sandoval for governor, but in Glenn Cook's column of Sept. 13, he states that Christine Clark, formerly UNLV vice president of diversity and inclusion, will now be teaching one class this semester and get paid an annual salary of $162,760. This leads me to believe that some of these professors need to spend more time in the classroom.

    Mr. Cook's column goes on to state that next semester, Ms. Clark's salary will be reduced to $135,200, which will be more in line with other College of Education faculty.

    What has happened to our higher educational system that these professors can be paid so much for so little classroom time?

    President Smatresk is also quoted as stating, "We are steadfast in our commitment to our educational mission. Students are our wards and our calling."

    Looks like it's all about the money to me -- mission be damned.

    Jerry Steffes

    LAS VEGAS

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 17 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    tweedledee wrote on September 20, 2009 09:57 PM: Profits on cars are miniscule compared to the wages and investment of the country they are assembled in. Volkswagon is building a plant in Tennesee that will employ 2000 or so yet it is figured they could generate as many as 10,000 more jobs in the US. The money those workers get paid is what creates those new jobs and those jobs create more new jobs. Forget about the profit that goes back to wherever and look at the payroll that is spent here. Michigan is a basket case because those auto payrolls funded many other jobs that disappeared when the plants closed.

    The problem with trying to buy American is how do you know it's American? Many manufacturers don't print the product origin on the box or product. I recently bought auto parts online that were from top names in the industry. Made in China. Go to any top name auto parts store in the country and odds are much of what they sell was made in China. I work for an old line company that supplies products that are found in most homes in the country and they are chock full of Chinese, just like our competitors. We have our own plants in China to make parts. I believe you only need 60 to 65% American content to label a product as made in the USA.


    Built in America wrote on September 20, 2009 08:48 PM: Wade what your saying is stupid your either ignorant or maybe racist remember I said maybe! So what your saying is if GM starts exporting the cars made in there Chinese factory back to the USA then you will buy the cars made in China because the profits will come back to the USA? Just like thousands of other USA companies who send our jobs over sea or next door. If you want to support American jobs buy products made in the USA it don't matter who owns company shareholders own the company and they can be from anywhere. Why wouldn't you buy from a company that invest billions of dollar in plant, manufacturing, R&D, network of supplies, distributors and retailer all in the USA. My uncle works for Nissan in Tennessee and it allowed him to buy a house take care of my cousins and vacation in Vegas! That’s what’s wrong with the mentality of many Americans today. Many of my coworker think like Wade because through there own admission they don’t like people who are not white and just for your info I’ am.


    Joke of the Day!! wrote on September 20, 2009 03:55 PM: What is the difference between ACORN and an Escort Service?

    Answer: nothing. Each deal with Prostitutes and Tax Evasion. The Escort Service however deserves more respect as it is not tax funded.

    ps: Jim Jones, the founder of Jonestown and Koolaid, was a Democrat. Commune-Communism. Implosion.


    newsbreak wrote on September 20, 2009 03:35 PM: Iran replaces Dollar with Euro in FX

    "Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has ordered the replacement of the US dollar by the euro in the country's foreign exchange accounts."

    http://presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=106669§ionid=351020102

    Expect a war very shortly.


    winston smith wrote on September 20, 2009 02:33 PM: In their zeal to manipulate us into a one-world government, the fascist/globalist banksters that own the Federal Reserve have purposely encouraged our manufacturing base to be moved to foreign countries, especially Communist China, where wages are kept artificially low.

    This has helped create the ridiculous trade imbalance, which the false "free-traders", using the WTO, NAFTA and GATT, take advantage of in order to lower the average American's standard of living, making it more likely to happily merge us with Canada and Mexico in the North American Union.

    The klepto-republicrats in the federal government are bought and paid for by the globalists, and will continue in their economy-destroying ways, hoping the that citizenry does not realize what is going on until it is too late.


    "If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them (around the banks), will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered." - Thomas Jefferson


    What stupidity! wrote on September 20, 2009 01:41 PM: Common Sense, you're an idiot!


    KD wrote on September 20, 2009 11:54 AM: Bravo, Common Sense!

    Particularly the "print money" phase of this deluded cycle is going to come to a halt in an instant. Already the UN has called for replacing the US Dollar as the currency of record. China has stopped buying US Treasury Notes as they are almost at the stage that they fear we will NEVER pay them back. And if we keep spending like drunken sailors, we will be unable to pay back our obligations, especially Social Security and Medicare.

    Government officials and party hacks can claim "the recession is over" because of slowdown of declining economic indicators, but a decline is a decline, even if the acceleration of that decline is easing. When another million ARMs readjust on commercial and residential real estate, the other shoe will drop with a thud. When we have no viable economy, where will the tax revenues come from then?


    gunowners4obama wrote on September 20, 2009 10:33 AM: The only thing made in the US anymore is meth, hookers, tattoos, and crappy cars.

    Thank you unions!"

    Unions? You're blaming unions? How about thank you CEO's who now make 300 times the pay of their company's average worker, when a few decades ago it was about 30 times. How about thank you federal government that promotes, supports and massively subsidizes big business, even when it relies on Chinese workers? How about the Walton family with its jets and multiple homes, its failure to offer decent health insurance to its workers so that they end up costing the taxpayers, its lousy salaries, its poor-quality, made-in-China products, etc.?

    Yet Americans will still shop at Wal-Mart and screw our own country so they can save a couple of bucks. If you're so poor that Wal-Mart is necessary for you to survive, then stop having kids.

    And that's where the meth and the hookers and so on come from- not unions, but parents who shouldn't be parents. (Unions? How do you blame unions for bad parenting? What kind of twisted thinking can blame employees' rights organizations for meth, tattoos, and whatnot? You are weirdly brainwashed by the right.)

    How about thank you government for subsidizing poor parents who shouldn't have kids in the first place? As long as this keeps up, we know what will keep happening. It shouldn't be paying poor people subsidies when they have kids; it should be paying them to NOT have kids.

    Then maybe the kids who are born here to parents who can support them would have the resources and educations they need to have a chance to grow up and overthrow kings like Sam Walton.

    But you right-wingers don't believe in birth control and abortion, right? Keep spewing out the little ignorant ones. And then blame unions.


    HELEN WEILS wrote on September 20, 2009 10:29 AM: AS LONG AS WE ALLOW GREEDY UNION THUGS TO DICTATE HOW MUCH THEY WILL GET PAID JOBS WILL GO ELSEWHERE. HELL, WHO IN THEIR RIGHT MIND WOULD PUT UP WITH THEIR BS???


    why doesn't this newspaper answer the tax questions it has been asked ? wrote on September 20, 2009 10:24 AM: Here's what the Constitution says about taxes:


    Read All Comments