Comments (18) | Add a comment
Glenn Cook
Exploding the promise of 'green jobs'
Can we finally put to rest the idea that government creates jobs? Can everyone finally agree that "green jobs" will never be part of an economic recovery -- in Nevada or anywhere else?
There is simply no spinning or distorting the failure of one of President Obama's biggest initiatives and campaign promises. "Hope" and "Change" hinged on creating 5 million green jobs in 10 years. As a down payment, the stimulus abomination set aside billions of dollars, including a $500 million grant to train 125,000 people for the noble work of the future.
As of this summer, of the nearly 53,000 people who had completed the training at a cost of $163 million, barely 8,000 had found work. Only 1,000 had held a job for more than six months, according to a report released this month by the Labor Department's inspector general.
Is America just not ready for such new, high-tech positions heralding an age of renewable energy? Could that explain why so many people training for the jobs of the future can't find work today?
Well, no. According to the inspector general's report, some of the positions that fall under the administration's definition of "green jobs" include: forklift operator, sheet metal worker, welder, plumber, electrician, car mechanic and garbage handler.
Did you really think 5 million people in this country would hold sustainable jobs manufacturing, assembling and maintaining solar panels and wind turbines? If you do anything that could conceivably benefit the environment -- install a no-flush urinal or an energy-efficient appliance, drive a hybrid bus, collect used cooking oils, lobby against fossil fuels -- you are a green-collar worker, as far as Washington is concerned.
Those Republic Services workers who toss your recyclables into a diesel truck? Green jobs! (Why didn't they need taxpayer-funded training to learn that skill?)
Nevada's share of those federal numbers were, as you would expect for a state with the worst unemployment rate in the country, utterly dismal. The state Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation got $6 million to train 7,125 workers, of which 5,238 were projected to retain employment. To date, the department has spent $147,408 training 375 people. And just four of them have managed to hold a job.
Far from creating new jobs, the government is wasting piles of money reclassifying jobs.
In a related initiative, according to the Labor Department report, the state spent almost $3.7 million on software and program upgrades, with no new positions resulting -- unless you consider the public employees who disburse the greenbacks as having "green jobs."
This particular boondoggle is separate from another epic stimulus giveaway: weatherization grants. Making the homes of lower-middle and lower-class residents more energy-efficient was seen as a win-win by the Obama administration and the Nevada Legislature's Democratic majorities: It would save those residents a few bucks a month on utility bills and buy their votes in future elections.
The state employment department awarded $1.57 million in grants to train people in weatherization skills, such as putting in insulation, snapping on solar screens, weather-stripping, caulking, fixing broken windows, inspecting appliances -- the kind of stuff a apprentice learns in a couple of days. And the Nevada Housing Division was allocated some $37 million to weatherize houses.
But Nevada already had a glut of out-of-work, unionized construction workers who could do the job in their sleep.
So you'll never guess what happened. Existing construction workers did almost all the work -- some $31 million worth so far. Of the 683 people who completed Nevada's weatherization training program, only 191 found jobs -- many of them in areas other than weatherization. And an undetermined number of those 683 already had construction jobs and used the program to pick up a free certification.
The state employment department stopped funding the training programs in July 2010 because "there was a far greater supply of workers than demand for those job opportunities," Nevada Housing Division spokeswoman Hilary Lopez said.
No demand for new green jobs? Say it ain't so!
Through July of this year, 7,752 Nevada homes had been weatherized at a cost of nearly $4,000 per home. (That's a lot of weather-stripping!) Whether these handouts will offer any return on investment through utility savings remains to be seen. As part of the program, state inspectors have to verify that contractors have done the work they reported, then help homeowners track their energy usage to see if it's done any good.
Did this initiative create any jobs? Yes, but only temporary ones. Using federal Office of Management and Budget calculations -- which appear to be as mysterious and proprietary as the formulas used to determine your credit score -- the Nevada Housing Division estimates that, month to month, the weatherization program created and/or retained up to 44 jobs among subgrantees (nonprofit program administrators) and up to 53 jobs among contractors.
But when the weatherization program funds are exhausted, likely by the end of this year, those few jobs will be history. In an area where three-quarters of homeowners are underwater on their mortgages, who in their right mind would spend $4,000 on any home improvement, let alone weatherization, especially when they might not have a job in another year?
At least Nevada managed to actually weatherize a lot of homes. Another stimulus weatherization initiative, called Retrofit Ramp-Up, handed out $452 million to 25 cities. Seattle collected $20 million of that with the goal of creating 2,000 green jobs. After a year, Seattle had weatherized just three homes, creating 14 new jobs, mostly administrative. Other cities were a bust, too.
Billions of dollars down the toilet for temporary jobs. A House Oversight Committee report estimates that each green job costs taxpayers about $157,000. A Government Accountability Office report says 47 overlapping federal employment and training programs cost $18 billion per year without measuring whether they work.
Last month, in an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, "Attention Deficit Democracy" author James Bovard pointed out that the federal government has rolled out job-training programs for half a century. "The record is one of failure and scandal," resulting in actual earnings losses for many participants.
"If federal job training efforts worked, Congress would not have thrown out the programs it has created every decade or so and enacted new ones," Bovard wrote. "In reality, government training has always been driven by bureaucratic convenience, or politicians' re-election considerations. There is no reason to believe the latest round of proposals will be any different."
Want to create permanent jobs? Get government out of the way.
Glenn Cook (gcook@reviewjournal.com) is a Review-Journal editorial writer.
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Jack you are projecting again...up your dosage....
Gary amend that to "temporary jobs" and you got it....
Obama's job bill will cost approximately 35 billion to save or create 400,000 jobs for unions....economically unfeasible...that money could be spent on all of us with underwater home mortgages....
A small fact most don't know about the weatherization programs initiated by the Green Czar Van Jones was designating "at risk youth" as the beneficiaries of the job training, through the unions. The truth is most companies/utilities who were to execute the training had problems sending individuals with criminal records (could not be bonded) into grandma and grandpa's home. In addition, the programs were explosively expensive because the unskilled trainees were to be paid union wages, i.e. change a light bulb=union electrician wages. Clark County has a program that was announced last week, initiated by Frank Hawkins and County Commish Chris G. using $4 Million in federal government funds to refurbish abandoned residences in Chris G.'s district which includes the "at risk youth" formula. I would love to see what the books reflect in cash disbursements (unskilled labor earning union wages, administrative charges) charged to the government funding. And...maybe inspecting the integrity of the weatherization programs in the first place will explain the lack of job retention...it's really just a hoax to funnel money to the unions and politicians pockets.
U dont need help, Obama gave everyone a shovel ready job!
Electricity in this country is not generated with oil from the Middle East. Sorry to burst your bubble, folks. It's generated by burning a whole lot of coal, an abundant resource in the USA. If the objective is to reduce Green House gas, then build nuclear power plants like France did. If the objective is to waste your money on sexy energy sources, then invest in so called green energy generated electricity. With regard to recycling and all of that crap, burn the trash to make electricity. If you don't burn trash and you LANDFILL it, methane is generated and methane is about ten times worse than CO2 when it comes to bad green house gases. Finally, burning fossil fuels is not the core reason CO2 is generated on the planet. Do your research, folks. CO2 gases (measured in PPM) have been on the rise since the Industrial Revolution when the population of Planet Earth started to explode! You want to reduce the green house gases like methane and CO2 from heating up the planet and causing "global planet disruption"? STOP HAVING BABIES! It's all about world population. You want to cool it down? ...then get a handle on the number of people demanding food, clean water and ELECTRICITY. The problem is too many people that need the infrastructure of buses, cars, trains, power plants, and landfills that generate CO2 and methane. These billions of people need to eat goats, pigs, cows & sheep that defecate and make methane gas. Covering the earth with wind generators and solar panels is addressing the result of overpopulation, not the cause of global warning.
Another liberal failure and fraud exposed. 2012 is coming.
AMEN!
My suggestion for a Green Jobs Program: hire some people to start hanging environmentalists, from trees. It would be temporary, there aren't that many rabid ones left, but it would do some good at least. Also no training would be needed.
Chandler: Buggy whips and coal great come back. Let's just stop burning fossil fuels now. All of them. That way we could revert to that third world status all the dems accuse the repubs of wanting.
Maybe we'll have better luck in Uganda.