Opinion

Fill the vacancies on the federal bench

By OSCAR B. GOODMAN
AND JANET L. CHUBB
SPECIAL TO THE LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
Posted: Jun. 9, 2011 | 2:02 a.m.

Suppose you went to court to settle a legal dispute and there was no judge.

That's happening right now in our overworked federal courts. Criminal defendants may wait up to six months and civil litigants up to two years for their cases to come to trial because there simply aren't enough judges. You can still count on having your day in court -- but don't count on having it anytime soon.

We all depend on a fully staffed, well-qualified judiciary to dispense criminal justice and settle civil disputes. But this fundamental part of our American system of government is at risk. Federal courts are experiencing a judicial vacancy crisis of historic proportion. More than 10 percent of federal judgeships are now vacant. By some estimates, the vacancy rate could grow to 50 percent within a decade if the process of filling vacancies continues to lag and if Congress expands the federal judiciary even modestly (as it should) to meet expected caseload growth. That many courtrooms with no judges would be an injustice -- for all.

How has one of the three branches of our government -- the judiciary -- come to this crisis? Simple: The other two branches of government have failed to do their jobs effectively. There are currently nearly 90 vacant seats on our federal trial and appellate courts with some 20 more seats to become vacant in the next year. The president has yet to make nominations for about half of these seats, including two on the U.S. District Court for Nevada. Several vacancies have been pending without nominees for more than a year. For those vacancies with nominees, the Senate has not moved forward with confirmation votes in a timely way. While the pace of judicial confirmations has increased since the new Congress convened in January, and Sen. Harry Reid and other Senate leaders -- of both parties -- deserve credit for this, much more work still needs to be done to resolve the vacancy crisis.

First, the president needs to step up the pace of nominations. In the 9th Circuit, which includes Nevada, there are 20 current or impending judicial vacancies of which 13 have no nominee. Four of these vacancies are on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the nation's busiest appellate court. In our neighboring district of Arizona, there are three vacancies (one caused by the murder of Chief Judge John Roll in January), leading the court there to declare a judicial emergency. The president must do his part to address promptly the emergency in Arizona and the broader vacancy crisis.

Second, the Senate leadership needs to step up the pace of confirmation votes. The Senate should schedule votes for all pending nominees. It is the president's prerogative to make judicial nominations and the Senate's job to decide whether or not to confirm a particular nominee. It is no one's job to endlessly obstruct an eventual up-or-down vote. The Senate has procedures for cutting off debate and bringing even controversial nominees to a vote. Sen. Reid deserves credit for invoking these "cloture" procedures recently and he should not hesitate to do so again if necessary.

Filling vacancies on our federal courts should not be a partisan food fight. For more than 200 years, across the waxing and waning of political parties, the executive and legislative branches have cooperated to fill judicial vacancies as they arise. We need them to do so again now or the federal judiciary, a beacon of justice around the world, will falter, and all of us will lose.

Oscar B. Goodman, an attorney, is mayor of Las Vegas. Janet L. Chubb is a Reno lawyer who serves on the 9th Circuit Lawyer Advisory Board.

Comments

Registration Notice: The Review-Journal has implemented a new registration procedure that requires all existing and new accounts to validate and login using Facebook. Visit the Registration FAQ for more information.
Terms & Conditions

The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

  1. David Jun. 9, 2011 | 11:43 a.m. Report Abuse

    Sounds perfectly healthy to me Shadow. It really shows how much those positions are actually unneeded with them being vacant for so long.

  2. TheShadow Jun. 9, 2011 | 11:09 a.m. Report Abuse

    It's not just the Federal bench. There are a couple of vacancies at the Federal Reserve and, I understand, a bunch of high level posts are vacant at Treasury. Obama appears to not want to take on the Republicans, but in the mean time there are some decisions being made by basically unknown care takers. Then some decisions are simply are not being made. This is not a healthy situation. As the article says, the President needs to step up.

  3. Garry Jun. 9, 2011 | 7:32 a.m. Report Abuse

    Spoken as typical liberal Lawyers. It seems strange I did not see a similar editorial when the Democrats were busily blocking every republican nominee to the federal courts during the Bush and Reagan administrations.
    We sat and listened to weeks of testimony from a digruntled ex employee of Clarence Thomas before they confirmed him. In fact, the Democrats fought like animals to keep the first black and first hispanics off the supreme court, mm who is the real racists here again? How about if you ultra left attorneys tell your failure of an ideologue president to stop trying to stuff the courts with anti gun, anti life and anti constitution buddies and seek to appoint some middle of the road constitutionalist judges to these spots, then complain if the process does not spped up. Bet it would help a great deal Oscar.

  4. David Jun. 9, 2011 | 7:00 a.m. Report Abuse

    "Suppose you went to court to settle a legal dispute and there was no judge." - Sounds like heaven. Private abritration is the way to go. We don't need government employees dressed in black robes of mystisism handing out injustice for the benefit of government. Judges are just another group of government employees that lack any real incentive to do a decent job. They are merely welfare queens but with far too much power over individuals with no accountability. Time to fire them all and force them to become productive members of society instead of dangerous drains.

Saturday, May 26, 2012
Partly Sunny Partly Sunny, 60° Weather Forecast