Opinion

Glenn Cook

Getting a handle on firefighters and sick-leave abuse

Posted: Feb. 27, 2011 | 2:03 a.m.

The appropriate response to the maddening sick-leave abuse carried out by Clark County firefighters is not better oversight.

The county needs to reduce the number of sick days firefighters receive, if not eliminate the benefit.

If a senior firefighter can take the equivalent of four months off from work because of "illness" (wink, wink), the main problem isn't weak, unaccountable supervision and a department culture of entitlement. It's that firefighters each year get more paid leave than they can possibly need, and that over time they can bank enough to collect payouts worth a year's salary.

If you take away the sick leave and firefighters' ability to use it as a savings account, you take away their ability to abuse it.

A county review determined that one-third of the department's firefighters were abusing sick leave, either by using it for vacations, scheduling it months in advance or coordinating sick calls with other firefighters to drive up overtime wages.

When an arbitrator recently sided with county management on a new, cost-saving firefighter contract, much was made of a provision that authorizes the fire chief to demand a doctor's note if a firefighter takes five sick days in a single year. Previously, such a demand could be made only if more than three consecutive sick days were claimed.

But nothing was done to roll back the amount of paid leave firefighters receive. They still get 12 days of sick leave each year. They still get between eight and 15 days of vacation each year, depending on seniority. Considering county firefighters are supposed to work 10 24-hour shifts per month, they're getting the equivalent of two to three months of paid leave each year, with cash-out options and opportunities to earn bonus leave to boot.

These practices -- the sick-leave abuse, the paid-leave buy backs, the ginned-up overtime -- cost taxpayers millions of dollars per year. A year and a half ago, the county had $16 million in sick leave and vacation liabilities for fire personnel.

A business would fire the abusers and get rid of perks that threatened to bankrupt the company. Benefit reductions are a fact of life in the battered private sector.

Clark County has a long way to go before it gets a grip on its out-of-control personnel costs. It can start by using future contract negotiations to combine sick and vacation days under a "paid leave" umbrella, then slashing the amount of leave by at least half.

A billion here ...

Earlier this month, unemployed construction workers appealed to lawmakers to put them back to work on public works projects.

The Building Jobs Coalition, an alliance of labor and management organizations, wants the Legislature to pass a $1 billion bond for infrastructure by imposing either a 0.25 percentage-point increase in the sales tax rate or a property tax hike of 10 cents per $100 of assessed value. The coalition says the bill would create 100,000 jobs.

I don't know what kind of multiplier they're using in their projections, but $1 billion doesn't go far these days when you're talking about large-scale construction projects.

The Cosmopolitan, which just opened on the Strip, cost $3.9 billion. The Smith Center for the Performing Arts, being built in downtown Las Vegas, will cost about $470 million.

The badly needed Boulder City bypass highway would cost about $500 million. Project Neon, a Nevada Department of Transportation plan to widen and improve Interstate 15 just south of the U.S. Highway 95 interchange, in addition to other downtown roads, would cost at least $1.1 billion. The Las Vegas National Sports Center, the ballpark, stadium and arena plan for downtown, would cost $1.57 billion.

A hundred thousand jobs? For a $1 billion bond? Perhaps a few thousand, depending on the chosen project, but no more.

Titus on the air

My Jan. 16 column, "Return of the reluctant professor," detailed Democrat Dina Titus' soft landing at UNLV after her November election loss to Republican Joe Heck in the 3rd Congressional District race.

Despite serving just three semesters as a political science professor over the past five years, and despite her obvious interest in running for Congress again in 2012, Titus got her old job back in a heartbeat. She even received a 6.5 percent pay raise from the cash-strapped university, upping her annual salary to $107,855 -- and she has to teach only one class this semester.

Titus soon will have an additional responsibility I didn't report last month. Starting sometime in March, she will host a half-hour public affairs show on KUNV-FM, 91.5, the university's radio station. The schedule for the show, to be called "Nexus," has not been determined, according to university spokeswoman Afsha Bawany, but it will air between 6 p.m. and 8 p.m.

Titus wrote on her blog that the show would air Tuesdays and Thursdays, and "will feature interviews with local policy makers, trend setters, and university scholars, and will focus on the nexus between 'town and gown.' "

That's some mighty fine, taxpayer-funded publicity for a former and aspiring politician. Will Titus have to claim it as an in-kind contribution?

She also found time to speak at a Monday union rally in Las Vegas, and recently returned from Washington after her first meeting as a member of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

Where does she find the time to be, you know, a professor?

Glenn Cook (gcook@reviewjournal.com) is a Review-Journal editorial writer.

Comments

Registration Notice: The Review-Journal has implemented a new registration procedure that requires all existing and new accounts to validate and login using Facebook. Visit the Registration FAQ for more information.
Terms & Conditions

The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

  1. HELEN WEILS Mar. 7, 2011 | 8:31 a.m. Report Abuse

    Why do the lazy bums who only work one 24 hour shift per week need any sick days? Firethugs!

  2. Wallbanger Mar. 3, 2011 | 4:00 p.m. Report Abuse

    Our military, law enforcement, and ELECTED OFFICIALS need to HONOR THEIR OATH TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION!!!

    oathkeepers.org

  3. bc Feb. 28, 2011 | 9:50 a.m. Report Abuse

    Donewithit. What dare are you talking about? Imagining what FFs families go through? Families all have to deal with the breadwinner's schedule. In general you are on 24, off 48. The 24 can be rough with a couple of calls during the night. But more than a month off per year on sick call and a month to a month and a half for vacation is a lot. Most in the private sector get 2 weeks off per year and many times that includes sick leave (yes, I have worked for companies that have that policy). Most companies that do have sick leave do not pay it off when you leave, you lose it. As for families dealing with you being out, mine had to deal with me being gone for several days and sometimes several weeks at a time for travel. And no, business travel for the most part is not some fun vacation time on the clock.

    Firefighters have an important job and should be paid reasonable. 2-3 months of paid leave per year is not reasonable. There are a lot of hard working government workers in Nevada, CC and LV, but the firefighters of CC are making them all look bad. Firefighting is an honorable profession in most places, but not in Clark County anymore. And no, I work in the private sector.

  4. ScottNV Feb. 28, 2011 | 8:15 a.m. Report Abuse

    Firefighters are given three times the amount of sick leave hours as other county employees.

  5. taxed out Feb. 27, 2011 | 8:14 p.m. Report Abuse

    these hoseholders are nothing more than sneak thieves that steal in the darkness of night, only difference is , they stole a whole lot more, put a dark cloud over all public employees and got caught red handed.....................the biggest difference between them and an run of the mill sneak thief is now theyve been caught they try to tell the public they deserve to steal from us. LMAO, what a joke they have made of a once honorable blue collar job.

  6. Franklin Feb. 27, 2011 | 6:46 p.m. Report Abuse

    Of all the lame brained excuses for you guys fleecing the public for the last few decades. Wow. You guys should be ashamed of your actions. You are absolutely lower than scum. I watched you guys in action when my neighbors house burned to the ground (and the 2 on both sides). Hitting on the girls standing around. 40 FF's with about 3 actually training a hose or 2 on the burning house. The Key Stone Kops make you guys look like pathetic 4 year olds.

  7. donewithit Feb. 27, 2011 | 6:22 p.m. Report Abuse

    See I knew it. You couldn't take the dare.

  8. Rebels34 Feb. 27, 2011 | 5:16 p.m. Report Abuse

    Yeah, the firefighter families do make big sacrifices. My friend felt real bad for a girl we worked with. She's married to a firefighter, and was awfully lonely on his 24's, so he took it upon himself to make sure he took care of her needs because her hubby couldn't. Who says the community doesn't support their firefighters?

  9. Buddy Feb. 27, 2011 | 4:16 p.m. Report Abuse

    The reason Glenn Cook is a writer and not a HR specialist is clear, he doesn't understand HR issues. Sick time is provided for bonafide illness or injury for you and your immediate family. If Mr. Cook didn't accrue sick time, as he proposes, and he or someone in his family gets in an auto accident which requires multiple surgeries and significant recovery and rehab time, he wouldn't have any accrued sick time to use to cover his family's injury. What if his wife is diagnosed with aggressive breast cancer, let's say he takes a few days of sick time to consult local doctors, then he has to go out of state to consult better cancer doctors and uses a few more sick days, then she has surgery and he uses a few more sick days, etc. There are a lot of legitimate reasons why people use sick time, sometimes the amount of sick time can appear excessive, but if you gave the user an opportunity to explain you might not believe the use to be abuse. Don't rush to judge all public workers or firefighters just because a few might have abused.

  10. Dan.Ferguson Feb. 27, 2011 | 4:06 p.m. Report Abuse

    and the review journal plan continues to change history and re hash a story again. What is your real agenda Glenn.
    Tow the company line and stay in good graces with the boss.
    same story, same story, same story.
    Sisolak ran for office in 2008 saying he was going to hire more firefighters and police, Why don't you investigate that story??
    It is now 2011, what??

Read All Comments

Saturday, May 26, 2012
Partly Sunny Partly Sunny, 60° Weather Forecast