Opinion

EDITORIAL

Krolicki in limbo

Posted: Nov. 28, 2009 | 10:00 p.m.
Updated: Apr. 10, 2012 | 10:05 a.m.

The criminal case against Nevada Lt. Gov. Brian Krolicki has been pretty odd from the get-go.

Mr. Krolicki had been rising in Republican party ranks, advancing from state treasurer to lieutenant governor, with well publicized plans to challenge U.S. Sen. Harry Reid in 2010 ... when Democratic Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto decided to indict Mr. Krolicki on charges of mishandling state funds.

Ms. Cortez Masto's indictment, handed down a year ago, alleges Mr. Krolicki misappropriated and falsified accounts involving the Nevada College Savings Program.

There was no money found missing from the $3 billion fund. What that left was the question of whether Mr. Krolicki's handling of the program's $6 million marketing and advertising budget fell within his discretion, or whether it rose to the level of a criminal offense.

Now, it turns out the husband of Ms. Cortez Masto organized a recent fundraiser for one of Mr. Krolicki's political opponents.

At a court hearing in the case last week, Deputy Attorney General Christine Guerci-Nyhus said she understood it was difficult to believe Ms. Cortez Masto was unaware of her husband's political activities, but she assured the court that was the case. She said Ms. Cortez Masto would withdraw from the case if so requested.

But, "This offer is too little, too late," Richard Wright, an attorney for Mr. Krolicki, said at the beginning of an hour-long hearing to determine whether the case should be thrown out for lack of evidence -- a question Judge Valerie Adair has yet to resolve.

Mr. Wright said another delay in the case would effectively ruin Mr. Krolicki's election chances next year.

After the hearing, Mr. Wright reiterated that the case against Mr. Krolicki is a "partisan prosecution," arguing either the state or the court should dismiss the whole shebang.

Indeeed, at the very least Ms. Cortez Masto should stop merely "offering" to withdraw from the case. Further delays at this point will only amplify suspicions that this was a political prosecution from the start. Either the charges should be dismissed, or Mr. Krolicki deserves his day in court -- right away.

Comments

Registration Notice: The Review-Journal has implemented a new registration procedure that requires all existing and new accounts to validate and login using Facebook. Visit the Registration FAQ for more information.
Terms & Conditions

The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

  1. SilverStateNative Nov. 28, 2009 | 6:48 p.m. Report Abuse

    WHAT KIND OF NUT CASE THINKS IT'S OKAY TO DIVERT TAXPAYER DOLLARS??

  2. Julie.Gallardo Nov. 28, 2009 | 6:46 p.m. Report Abuse

    Steve F.

    What's a shame is YOUR IGNORANCE! Man, this Krolicki guy did commit a crime. So, just go away, man!

  3. SilverStateNative Nov. 28, 2009 | 6:44 p.m. Report Abuse

    Steve F.

    When did they let you out of the County Jail? Thought they locked you up for good????

  4. SilverStateNative Nov. 28, 2009 | 6:43 p.m. Report Abuse

    Steve F., are you bipolar?? First, you agree to cancel your RJ subscription, then you go off on a tangent against Harry Reid. What gives, man??

  5. Julie.Gallardo Nov. 28, 2009 | 6:41 p.m. Report Abuse

    YEAH, STEVE, BACK OFF, MAN. YOU'RE LOOKING WACKO!!

  6. SilverStateNative Nov. 28, 2009 | 6:40 p.m. Report Abuse

    Poor Steve. It looks like you have a vendetta against Sen. Reid. WOW! Is it so bad at your house that you have to strike out at someone else. By the by, one e-mail per subject works best. It makes you look INSANE by sending three of the same missives!!

  7. SteveF8 Nov. 28, 2009 | 6:21 p.m. Report Abuse

    Bob,





    It's a shame if you are really so ignorant that you don't think Reid and his thugs and thieves know who's planning on running against him in every election LONG before they actually file. How naive of you to go through life with your head so buried in the sand and so ignorant of real life. Sad...very sad...

  8. SteveF8 Nov. 28, 2009 | 6:20 p.m. Report Abuse

    Bob,



    It's a shame if you are really so ignorant that you don't think Reid and his thugs and thieves know who's planning on running against him in every election LONG before they actually file. How naive of you to go through life with your head so buried in the sand and so ignorant of real life. Sad...very sad...

Read All Comments

Saturday, May 26, 2012
Partly Sunny Partly Sunny, 60° Weather Forecast