Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - Opinion

Saturday
Jul 31, 2010
Clouds And Sun
Clouds And Sun 101° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

sponsored by
Opinion


NEVADA VIEWS: Let locals run the range

Horses, cattle will have plenty to eat

I'm well into my 70s now. I've been in and out of the ranching business all my life. I've run a lot of horses, trapped coyotes and bobcats, cut post over a good portion of the state of Nevada. And I tell you, I have never been so disgusted.

For more than 50 years, all I've been hearing is how livestock are destroying the range, how cruel the mustangers were, or how the trees and bugs are being harmed. When, in fact, it's been the government and all the do-gooders who have been the problem causers.


Most Popular Stories
  1. Hispanics and illegal immigration
  2. Do as I say, not as I do
  3. Taxpayers can't afford scholarship
  4. Giving the business
  5. Appointing judges would give voters more say
  6. Feel-good hits of the summer



Take the wild horse issue, for example. For years I thought people would wake up and come to their senses someday, and things would get better. But instead it's gotten worse. I just wish I knew how many horses have died because of mismanagement in Nevada since The Wild and Free Roaming Horse Act was passed in 1971. It's got to be in the thousands.

Even up until last winter there in Kobeh Valley there were at least a couple hundred horses that were starving. But nothing was worse than what happened in the country south of there in the 1990s. Clear from U.S. Highway 6, all the way up through Little Sand Springs Valley and that country, clear to U.S. Highway 50, the range was eaten off to nothing. Water holes were tromped in -- water developments destroyed.

All because people from all over the country seem to think they have to have a say in how our wild horses are to be managed.

I've taken a lot of pictures of dying horses over the years. Pictures of horses attempting to suck water from the mud of a spring which has been nearly destroyed by the trampling of horses. Sometimes you can see how the horse has pawed the ground -- too weak to get up -- suffering day after day, until the poor thing finally died. Just imagine, if you will, the total impact of these kinds of situations -- wildlife, livestock, everything suffers.

Horses, it should be remembered, are larger than most animals. Even under ideal conditions, when there is plenty of feed and water on a range, they'll run other livestock or wildlife off a water hole. But when conditions like this occur, it can be terrible. Dozens of horses, all standing around waiting for a chance to suck mud or sip a little water, half of them being big studs, kicking and fighting each other and fighting off all the younger and weaker animals.

Nothing can be more cruel than a bunch of mustang studs, biting and kicking everything around them. No other animal can compete. Colts get knocked down, trampled and separated from their mothers -- who are often so dehydrated they don't care whether they have a colt or not.

But that doesn't describe the full extent, the true horrors of it all. When these kinds of things happen, it doesn't happen in just one small area or at just one water hole -- it happens over an entire rangeland.

The sad thing is, there seems to be no end in sight for these kinds of tragedies. The number of radical animal rights people and horse lovers, who in the end cause all the damage and suffering, seems to be growing.

And to think the only solution that anyone has come up with is the "adopt a horse" program, or holding facilities where thousands of horses are held indefinitely at the cost of millions of dollars each year. To me it's insanity.

What we should do is we should return to the old days, when people living within local communities decided what was best for the horses and resources that are found within their communities. Instead, people looking out the windows of their clean and polished offices in Texas or Colorado dream about the mustangs they own in Nevada, while the horses themselves starve and more and more ranchers are forced out of business.

No, what we need to do is to let the ranchers and the mustangers take care of the problem, just as they did in the old days. Back then, along in the fall a handful of cowboys would take their saddle horses, throw a bunch of grub and their bedrolls in the back of a pickup, and off they'd go to do a little mustanging.

It was a perfect system. The most qualified and experienced people were engaged. The horses were automatically kept at reasonable numbers. It cost the taxpayer nothing. The best of the horses were put on the market for people to use and enjoy. The remainder of the older and less undesirable animals were euthanized via a facility that made good use of the end product.

Rangelands were not overstocked. Springs were kept open and maintained by the ranchers. The cattle had plenty to eat. The horses had plenty to eat. Wildlife did well. Everything was better.

Of course no one would agree to something like that. What would all the wild horse people do if they agreed to something like that? They wouldn't have a cause to pursue, or anything to bitch about. What about the people who administer the program? It wouldn't do to put them out of work -- especially during times of high unemployment.

And so I suppose we will go on, doing as we have in the past, even if our rangelands continue to deteriorate, the horses continue to suffer, and more and more ranchers are put out of business. It's insanity, I tell you, insanity. But that's the way things are done these days.

George Parman runs a few head in the Diamond Valley, north of Eureka.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Comments (41)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

X

Register to comment

* Indicates fields that are required
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Male Female

Already registered? Log in now

X

Already registered to comment?

Log in below
E-mail
Password

Forgot your password? | Register
X

Forgot your password?

Enter your e-mail address below and a password will be resent to you.

Email
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Report abuse

James wrote on February 21, 2010 10:12 AM: Unfortunately, in a matter of a few short years, the public lands went from holding 2 million mustangs, to just under 50,000. If we would have let the mustangers continue, there would be no more horses running wild on public lands. Public lands do not belong to ranchers only, so why would ranchers only be able to manage them according to their own interests? No, there needs to be management, but your suggested management is not the answer, and neither is the BLM's current solutions.


Report abuse

Rob Holley wrote on February 02, 2010 08:42 AM: Mr. Parman, Well put. Those of use who've cowboyed, or explored the outback of Nevada (I mean off the beaten path where the wild things are) know the truth of your comments. Nobody, more than a cowboy or rancher, enjoys the sight of a band of horses long-trotting to water on a hot day, kicking up a trail of alkali dust into the still hot air. But lo, too many horses and not enough water, feed or cover for even the smallest of animals. Once healthy bunch grasses end up looking like the bristles of a worn-out old hair brush. I like the mustangs. I own one who's become a fine horse. There is balance that's become difficult to find amidst big government and the loud voices of the nay sayers.

30 years your younger, I'd love to have mustanged. It's only a dream for me.

Thank you for your insight.

Happy Trails to you, Sir


Report abuse

Muleskinner wrote on February 02, 2010 08:17 AM: Thank you George for this post. It is what I have been trying to say, more or less, for several years. It's sad that those people you descibed cannot see the devistation they have caused but the picture they have in their minds will never change.


Report abuse

Ray Williams wrote on February 01, 2010 06:49 PM: Amen, George, All of us who live in the rurals with the horses understand and concur with what you have said. Keep up the good work, Com Ray Williams


Report abuse

FairMaiden wrote on February 01, 2010 12:49 PM: George, honestly, I think perhaps you need to go back to the "drawing board" with your plan. Your comment of "radical animal rights people" is slightly offensive, however, I will consider the source. What do we call you? You stole the "best wild horses" and sent the older, less desirable to slaughter. Apparently, you are not aware that this is illegal. The wild horses belong to the "people", and are on public lands, our lands.
George, your article is full of inconsistencies, unfortunately, I do not have the time to point out each inconsistency. Please understand George, this "radical animal person" has patients to see right now.
But again, my prescription to you.....go back to the drawing board.


Report abuse

Jeff Hudson wrote on February 01, 2010 08:43 AM: Interesting point regarding the hunting franchise. One I have never thought of. Lets start off by making clear, I am a PRO hunter. I don't hunt but I feel these "Sportsman" when they act like "Sportsman" are as vital to our heritage as the wild horses. That said. Why don't all of you take a look at what Yosemite and Yellowstone add to the national treasury account every year and then look at what the Supposed (they like to think of themselves as this, don't blame them they listen to the NRA) hunting conservationist add to the general income of this country. I haven't seen it myself but I bet it will be a big eye opener to see what all dem nasty liberal city gangster types add to our national economy vs. the hunters in this country. Remember though Hunting does have its place and these people should be educated to be on OUR side
(The pro Mustang) more then they are on the cattle barons side. After all all those Elk and Deer do nothing but eat grass a cow can eat!


Report abuse

Barbara Warner wrote on February 01, 2010 08:26 AM: A study done by the Government Accounting Office in 1900-91 proved it was the millions of cattle on public lands that have over-grazed the range and destroyed riparian areas.The few thousand wild horses left are NOT guilty. They wander for miles unless fenced in or away from water and forage as some ranchers have done. It was because Wild Horse Annie saw how cruel mustanging was that the 1971 Wild Free Roaming and Burro Act was passed. This article is terribly biased and was written by a rancher who appears to think he owes OUR public lands and OUR AMERICAN wild horses. He does NOT. I am in my 70's too and my dad raised cattle . They defecate in water and pollute it with E. Coli and cause erosion with their cattle paths and wallows that I see every day. Horses do not. I am in KY and live on a farm with horses and two are rescued wild horses. Horses actually benefit the land with their manure and are symbiotic to the ecosystem and wildlife. Too bad some people don't know the real facts and have no compassion.They ought to read all the information in the comments by Terry and others and maybe they can learn the truth.


Report abuse

Alleghanygirl wrote on February 01, 2010 08:10 AM: Sage Rowe and Goldew,
I agree that the BLM is the major problem here. I also agree that if the mustangs were rounded up and some of the undesirable stallions were gelded and the older mares were spayed and the not so desirable mares were given the pregnancy shots so that the best mares and stallions were left "intact" and then turned back out on the range to breed, things would be alot better for them and our (meaning the American people) costs would be less. But the BLM won't hear of it. But for the ranchers like George or these "Organizations" that put out pics like the ones shown above stating that the mustangs tore up the ground around the water holes and stomped the ground to hard pack, you guys need to talk to a Coastal Extension Agent for Farm Services. Just to show you how much "damage" cattle do to the "banks" of any waterway there is a law on the books that we have to "fence off" any pond, lake, stream, creek, or river so that the cattle cannot get to the water because they do irrepairable damage to them AND they defecate in the water as well making the water non-potable. This I have seen with my own eyes during our own drought over the past several years! Plus, George back in the "good ole days" there weren't 7 million head of cattle on the range vieing for forage with the mustangs and wildlife. Also, you didn't state exactly how many head you were running except for a few???


Report abuse

T. Suzanne wrote on February 01, 2010 07:44 AM: Sue Wallis, I went to the site you recommended, and found what I consider to be mistruths and misconceptions. The very titles of the organizations are misleading, because in my view you are clearly no friends of horses.

This country has come to an all time low with people on your site fighting to slaughter horses, and a government agency, paid by tax payers, seizing every opportunity to deceive the public as to why they are killing, crippling and destroying American horses. The quote on your site, making it an insinuation that horses are starving and could be so weak they are killed by predators, has no application to the wild horses at all, and in my view is an underhanded attempt to justify your wish to slaughter horses. Did you have the author's permission to use that quote? Wild horses are healthy, it has been stated that they have no predators, and the fact is that too many evil people focus on destroying the lives of horses for their own personal gains and motives. These people ARE the predators.

Isn't it true that cattle are given free range while horses are being persecuted, removed, auctioned, crowded into pens, and killed? Would this have anything to do with ranchers?

It is time the public realizes what is going on. A misguided media allowing false statements made by the perpetrators, that they are "helping starving horses", is outrageous in my opinion. I hope there are enough people who respect this country and its horses to fight evil organizations and win.

These are just my thoughts and opinions, and I pray that good will prevail over evil to save these horses who are being subjected to uncivilized and barbaric


Report abuse

T. Suzanne wrote on February 01, 2010 06:39 AM: Patriots of this country care what happens to wild horses who should run free on the range. It is easy for evil people, who have their own selfish motives, to victimize helpless horses to satisfy their own agendas. Nobody has the right to run helpless horses with helicopters causing their injuries and deaths, nor should they shoot them. I am sickened by what our country has become with the disgusting actions and depraved hearts of those who plot to have innocent horses slaughtered. Taking over the land in the pretense that horses are starving and should be removed is an outrage, and lies contrived to fool the taxpayers of this country should be exposed and dealt with. Horses helped settle this country, in every way. They are not to be slaughtered for meat. Only the greedy and those with sick minds want to sacrifice horses in such a heinous manner. I think there is a special place in hell reserved for such persons.

Stop this persecution of horses. It reeks of collusion. Government agencies are public servants, as are Congressmen. Savagely causing the deaths of horses, however presented in public relations programs, is still barbaric. Citizens of this country do not want horses removed from land that is their home. They do not want them auctioned off or slaughtered. Stop this atrocity. This is not a communist country --- yet.


Read All Comments