Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Opinion


GEOFF SCHUMACHER: My generation

I'm going to be 44 in a few weeks. No big deal. But you need to know this to understand why this column is about the age of politicians.

Last November, just days after the presidential election, the writer Michael Chabon was a keynote speaker at the Vegas Valley Book Festival. I attended his talk, and afterward, when he signed books, I got to chat briefly with him.


Most Popular Stories
  • VIN SUPRYNOWICZ: What stops mass murderers? A gun
  • SHERMAN FREDERICK: Call evil by its rightful name
  • EDITORIAL: Terrorism on trial
  • EDITORIAL: A pre-9/11 approach to terror
  • LETTERS: Public-sector workers are still doing well
  • LETTERS: Harry Reid: Working hard for all Americans
  • EDITORIAL: 'That's the ticket!'
  • Our politicians are the greatest, all right
  • EDITORIAL: I believe in free speech, but ...
  • LETTERS: A giant octopus threatens rural Nevada




  • Chabon, a big supporter of Barack Obama, was giddy about the election's outcome. He marveled that the next president of the United States would be roughly the same age as us.

    It was something I hadn't thought much about, but Chabon's observation has stuck with me ever since. Obama is the first president with whom I have generational experiences in common.

    As the 2010 Nevada governor's race takes shape, the leading candidates appear to be Republican Brian Sandoval, who is 46, and Democrat Rory Reid, who is 47. Once again, the age issue has caught my attention. To make matters more interesting, I even crossed paths with Sandoval in college.

    This is all very intriguing to me, but why should you care? I would suggest, with some trepidation, that this generational shift in the corridors of political power will translate into new ways of conducting business and tackling problems.

    We have already seen this with Obama. During the campaign he took full advantage of the Internet to get people excited about and involved in his candidacy, a strategy that clearly helped put him over the top.

    As president, there's no question Obama has brought a new mind-set to the job. Unlike his predecessors, he does not look at the world through a Cold War lens. The context of that era is out the window, replaced by an eagerness to try new ways to resolve conflicts that previous generations saw as irresolvable.

    So now we have the good possibility that the next Nevada governor will be in his late 40s. The first to exhibit signs of new thinking was Rory Reid, who formally announced his candidacy Wednesday. His announcement was accompanied by the release of a 32-page publication outlining his "Vision for the Future of Nevada."

    The conventional wisdom, espoused by gray-headed political experts, is that a candidate should not release such a detailed document so early in the campaign. "Everybody advised me not to do what I'm doing," Reid told the Review-Journal. "Politics 101 is that you say nothing. Because if you say nothing, it is hard to argue with it."

    Bucking the experts, Reid has released an impressively designed document, loaded with reader-friendly charts and maps. And it can be easily downloaded from his deluxe Web site.

    Several ideas outlined in the document are fairly fresh, and extend far beyond the one-note campaign ("No new taxes") of the current governor. Reid's primary focus is on creating jobs and diversifying the industrial base.

    "We don't have to continue to rely on an economy and a state government based primarily on hospitality," Reid says. "Tourism will always be a large part of our economy and identity, but we need to broaden that economy and enlarge that identity to include new industries and businesses that have the potential for greater growth and higher-paying jobs."

    For example, Reid believes Nevada is well-situated to become a larger player in the growing field of shipping and distribution. "Nevada could become one of the leading trans-shipment centers of North America with smart planning and implementation," he says.

    He also touts the state as an ideal place to warehouse electronic data. "There is no safer place in the country to store data," he says. "No hurricanes, no tornadoes and no active fault lines." In Nevada, he says, "we sit at the greatest confluence of high-speed data fiber in the world. Twenty-six national carriers run broadband fiber that meets in Nevada."

    Reid also proposes an array of mechanisms -- loans, grants, tax credits and more -- to boost small-business investment and technology research in Nevada.

    None of this is sexy stuff. Reid is not promising voters the moon. And this is good -- in my view, practicality and pragmatism beat slogans and bombast.

    I can't tell you this new generation of political leaders will do a better job than its predecessors. The baby boomers thought they were better equipped to lead than the previous generation but they obviously failed to live up to their promise. The same thing could happen for Generation X.

    But I have a good feeling about my generation. Generally speaking, Gen X has proved to be innovative, skeptical, independent and determined not to repeat past mistakes.

    This is the first time in my life that I feel common cultural and political bonds with the candidates on the campaign trail. They are no longer wise elders. They are peers.

    Of course, being a good Gen Xer, I have to wonder if I'm completely full of it.

    Geoff Schumacher (gschumacher@reviewjournal.com) is the Review-Journal's director of community publications and the author of two books of Nevada history. His column appears Friday.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 22 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Geoff Schumacher wrote on October 16, 2009 10:37 PM: Once again, a lively series of comments about the column, and once again, not a single one of them even remotely attempts to address the question/issue raised by the column. What is it about Las Vegas-area commenters that they don't use this space to discuss the issue at hand?


    HELEN WEILS wrote on October 16, 2009 08:39 PM: SITTING IN A LITTLE SOUP PLACE HERE IN PORTLAND TODAY LISTENING TO 2 'ACADEMICS' DISCUSS THE NEXT SOCIAL PROGRAM THEY WERE IN FAVOR OF. BOTH HAD BEARDS AND SOUNDED LIKE SOME LIBERAL YOUNG VERSIONS OF FRASIER CRANE. WE LAUGHED, IT WAS SO PREDICATABLE. ONE OF THE GUYS GRABBED HIS ICE TEA GLASS WHEN THEY CAME TO CLEAR THE TABLE. 'BLA, BLA, BLA"


    HELEN WEILS wrote on October 16, 2009 08:35 PM: HEY MILES, YOU ARE ONE SMART 40 ALMOST 50 SOMETHING. WISDOM DOES COME WITH AGE. HOW MANY 'FEEL GOOD' SCHEMES WILL WE HAVE TO PAY FOR BEORE 'IT'S ENOUGH'
    TRY 'NEVER'.


    HELEN WEILS wrote on October 16, 2009 08:32 PM: YES, THE ALL WISE 40 SOMETHINGS WILL BE MUCH SMARTER THAN THE 50 SOMETHINGS AND 60 SOMETHINGS. I HAVE A 40 SOMETHING PARTNER, GREAT GUY. SO FAR MY 50 SOMETHING EXPERIENCES HAVE TRUMPED HIS 40 SOMETHING IDEAS EVERY TIME.
    EXPERIENCE COUNTS. YOU KNOW WHAT THEY SAY. ANYONE WHO ISN'T A LIBERAL IN THEIR 20'S (BEEN THERE, DONE THAT) DOESN'T HAVE A HEART, ANYONE WHO ISN'T A CONSERVATIVE IN THEIR 50'S DOESN'T HAVE BRAIN.


    FastTracker wrote on October 16, 2009 06:33 PM: Some of us realize that SYSTEMIC change is in order. It has NOTHING to do with age. Get a clue, Geoff.


    Michael Green wrote on October 16, 2009 05:56 PM: Geoff, have you ever noticed that when someone even slightly to the left of center, as you are, tries to discuss issues intelligently, right-wingers automatically prove themselves incapable of constructing a simple English sentence without sounding like hateful morons?


    loner wrote on October 16, 2009 02:31 PM: I'm 44 and I don't belong to either generation.


    Miles Monroe wrote on October 16, 2009 01:51 PM: I'm 47 and I'm not a member of generation X nor is Rory Reid. Funny how I find myself defending him. Generation X was a few years after and began in the mid to late 1980's. Our generation is the last of the baby-boomer years. At least that's what I generally believe. Gen X'ers have a different mindset. I didn't grow up with MTV, or even cable TV for that matter.

    I'm still not voting for the guy. If my governor was only allowed to make one promise I would prefer it to be "no new taxes."

    I mean if you want to "spread the wealth around" a bit why don't we start capping the amount retirees can receive from PERS? Let's say that the maximum payout regardless of service is $5,000/month. If we want to truly be "equal" then why should government workers receive pensions when by and large the private sector does not?


    Ken wrote on October 16, 2009 01:48 PM: I'm also in the same age group.

    Where were Reid's glossy ideas and publications in his current position? Whether you are 30 or 80 you should ask yourself, what has he done over the past ten years and why is he suddenly full of ideas when he has sat on his hands and simply defended his father's interests.

    Sounds old school to me.


    Kelly wrote on October 16, 2009 01:31 PM: I hope Reids campaign paid the LVRJ for this ad.


    Read All Comments