Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - Opinion

Thursday
Mar 18, 2010
Mostly Cloudy
Mostly Cloudy 64° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu

Opinion


EDITORIAL: Naked power play

If Democrats remain mystified by "tea parties" and other recent expressions of outrage against Washington, they ought to look no further than what their own are trying to pull in Massachusetts as a perfect example of why many Americans are fed up with politicians and politics.

The shenanigans involve the U.S. Senate seat held by the late Ted Kennedy.


Most Popular Stories
  1. Judging a judge
  2. Open ... and shut
  3. A lottery would raise money for education
  4. Only the private sector can create wealth
  5. Net neutrality
  6. Open court



Until 2004, Massachusetts law empowered the state's governor to fill an unexpected Senate vacancy. But the state had a Republican governor that year, and Sen. John Kerry won the Democratic Party's presidential nomination.

Worried that a Republican might be appointed to replace Sen. Kerry if he were elevated to the White House, Bay State Democrats, enjoying large legislative majorities, changed the rules to mandate that any vacancies be filled via special elections.

Fast forward five years. A Democrat now sits in the governor's office. Sen. Kennedy loses his life fighting brain cancer. It will be at least four months before Massachusetts can hold a special election, and Democrats are one vote short of a filibuster-proof 60 in the U.S. Senate as they race to pass a radical agenda.

Solution? Massachusetts Democrats rewrite the rules again.

On Tuesday, the state Senate voted 24-16 to allow Gov. Deval Patrick to select Mr. Kennedy's successor. The House passed the bill last week.

End of story? Nope.

Turns out that under the state constitution, laws passed by the legislature take effect 90 days after they're signed by the governor -- unless lawmakers attach a so-called "emergency pre-amble."

Such emergency measures must be approved by a two-thirds majority -- a benchmark lawmakers failed to achieve in ramming through changes in the succession process.

Not to worry.

The president of the Massachusetts Senate argues that the governor can get around the two-thirds problem by writing a letter to the secretary of state declaring his own "emergency." Presto! He can then appoint a favored Democrat immediately to save the day for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.

The lesson all this nonsense sends to schoolchildren is clear. Maintaining power is the primary purpose of political life. And if politicians don't like the rules or constitutional restrictions that stand in their way, they simply change them -- and if they can't change them, they ignore them.

It's the attitude that has given us a government that has grown far beyond the boundaries imposed by the nation's founding document, a government that meddles in even the most minute aspects of daily life, a government fast heading off a financial cliff thanks to big spenders and redistributionists who view the productive classes as their own giant Treasury.

It's the attitude that has a great many Americans up in arms. And they may have finally gotten sick enough to do something about it.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Leave Your Comment 32 Reader Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Current Word Count:

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

Report abuse

GerryS wrote on September 27, 2009 09:38 PM: "Fair and Balanced Fred" wrote:
"Your conscious and subconscious processes underlying your outward expressions of hysteria are readily transparent.

Much of it has to do with fear of a black president.

Get over it."

Please keep telling yourself that, Fred. It makes things so much easier when your opponents live in fantasy land. Of course, you're right. The last thing I want and my biggest fear is a president who looks a lot like me, only with lighter skin.


Report abuse

twc wrote on September 26, 2009 05:13 AM: I'm glad people as far as the great state of Nevada see the corrupt politics we see every day here in Massachusetts. The once great State is a joke when it comes to our politicians. Maybe someday the people will see past the D after a politicians name and vote for the person’s values. Fact is one politician is running for "Ted's" seat as they call it here on a platform for Abortion, Gay Marriage, and higher Taxes to fund schools because it’s for the children, no death penalty even for cop killers, illegal alien’s rights, and Obama care, on and on and on. Every liberal adjenda and without a worry that he might alienate anyone. That's my state and I am discussed with it.


Report abuse

Chip Ford wrote on September 25, 2009 06:40 PM: I live in Massachusetts, where many of us unenrolled/independent voters are angry and shapening the pitchforks and counting down the days.

See:
State Senators also toss us the Beacon Hill Middle Finger Salute
“The hypocrisy is staggering”

http://cltg.org/cltg/clt2009/09-09-24.htm


Report abuse

Ali wrote on September 25, 2009 04:25 PM: I live in MA and let me tell you that I am very angry about this issue and all the sneaky things the Democrats have done recently. Wyatt? We are ALL NOT a bunch of liberals here excepting this rediculous BS. BUT, I also feel that the abuse of power from the higer up Democrats is what is allowing these democrats to abuse their power as well and not be held accountable to anyone for their actions. I mean hey, the government is not even accountable....are they?


Report abuse

Stevie wrote on September 24, 2009 08:35 PM: If this was such an emergency why did Kennedy miss 97% of the past years votes?


Report abuse

Fair and Balanced Fred wrote on September 24, 2009 08:14 PM: "If Democrats remain mystified by "tea parties" and other recent expressions of outrage against Washington . . . ."

Mystified? Don't flatter yourselves. Your conscious and subconscious processes underlying your outward expressions of hysteria are readily transparent.

Much of it has to do with fear of a black president.

Get over it.


Report abuse

S. Summerlin wrote on September 24, 2009 04:43 PM: So "Tram Frank", it would appear you are supporting the actions of Massachussetts because of something Republicans did or have done.... or are you condemning the actions of both...

If you are not willing to condemn the actions of both, then you are a hypocrite.

... and people continue to wonder why we are distrustful of our government ...


Report abuse

Wyatt wrote on September 24, 2009 01:39 PM: Hey Angry..

How can you say that this doesn't affect us - the American people. Are you trying to hide the fact that with a replacement for poor Teddy, the senate now has another vote!!

Nice try but we are way too smart to not realize just what the dem's in Mass are trying to do. First Teddy's for it...then he's against it - even though he's dead he's still pulling strings - won't he just go away or are we going to live with that murderer for ever?


Report abuse

Tram Frank wrote on September 24, 2009 01:33 PM: ....reminds me of the time The Hammer Delay held open a '15 minute vote' for hours and hours until a member voted in favor of the bill. The lawmaker later said he was bribed by another member of congress to vote in favor of the Medicare D bill.

Republicans told America that Medicare D would only cost $250 million over 10 years; it was after the vote that we learned it cost a trillion dollars over 10 years which is a $100,000,000,000 unfunded hole in the fed budget every year.

P.S. We just had own own Gibbons enact "emergency" legislation concerning who can inject a patient and now we learn that it is unconstitutional! A regulation cannot overturn a statute and only the legislature can pass legislation.

Ah, raw power, indeed!


Report abuse

S. Summerlin wrote on September 24, 2009 12:42 PM: Hey "Angry" ---

This IS our business because the behavior of the Massachusetts government can equally be duplicated here, and even in the Federal Government.

It is our right to comment on the actions of others. We cannot control the actions, but it is our right to point out what we believe is a gross abuse of power.

It is behavior like this that is causing our government face serious concerns from the people, that it is out of control, punch-drunk on power, and "above the law"...

You tell me what State Emergency is impacted that should allow the governor to violate their own laws... and if they are willing to violate such simple things as succession laws, where else will a government out of control go?

Yes, this is a State's rights issue, and they have every right to be lawless... but does that mean we have to condone their behavior? ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!!

Regardless of political party and State that this occurs, can you refute this:

"Maintaining power is the primary purpose of political life. And if politicians don't like the rules or constitutional restrictions that stand in their way, they simply change them -- and if they can't change them, they ignore them."

I bet you thought the above about Bush, and now here it is about Kennedy and Obama and Massachusetts...

When does it become a problem with you?


Read All Comments