Comments (32) | Add a comment
Glenn Cook
Oceguera's double-dipping delight
Somebody call 911! John Oceguera's pants are on fire!
The Assembly speaker and North Las Vegas assistant fire chief just announced his candidacy for Congress on Monday, and already he has allowed a relatively small political blaze to spread to his back side.
Oceguera can't get his facts straight in explaining how he received roughly $70,000 in compensation from North Las Vegas while he was also drawing legislative pay in Carson City this year. Throw in the fact that he has yet to answer other important questions about his simultaneous service in two branches of government, and it's easy for taxpayers to conclude that Oceguera is taking advantage of them to further his political career.
The more you deny the obvious, the worse you look, especially when there's easily available evidence that contradicts your denial. Is this guy getting his media relations advice from Anthony Weiner, or what?
Back on June 26, I broke the story that Oceguera was being paid by the North Las Vegas Fire Department while serving as Assembly speaker during the 2011 session. Although he wasn't drawing his full salary from the city, taxpayers still provided him with a good chunk of change.
Then, on June 28, the Nevada Policy Research Institute released the findings of its own investigation into Oceguera's pay through its publication, the Nevada Journal. According to Fire Department work-roster logs obtained by NPRI, Oceguera drew his full salary during the 2011 session.
Oceguera and his boss, North Las Vegas Fire Chief Al Gillespie, asserted through letters to the editor and television and print interviews that the logs they were responsible for maintaining were inaccurate, and that as a result, NPRI had it all wrong.
Gillespie and Oceguera produced a written agreement: It said Oceguera would squeeze in nine hours of work per week for the department while leading the lower chamber of the Legislature during the budget crisis. Oceguera could cash in vacation time for extra income, but otherwise would take unpaid furloughs for the rest of each pay period.
The men also claimed that because Oceguera is a salaried administrator who's never really off duty, there's no reason to track his hours with precision. "So it doesn't matter what our ... when we're actually in the office or when we're responding to calls," Gillespie told NPRI's Steven Miller.
But the pay figures I reported didn't jibe with the written agreement released by Oceguera and Gillespie. If Oceguera was being paid for just nine hours per week -- about a quarter of his normal schedule -- then he would have received the equivalent of roughly one month's salary from the Fire Department over the four-month legislative session. Instead, he received about $30,000 for hours worked and longevity pay, or more than two months worth of salary. Amazingly, Gillespie and Oceguera declared those payroll records accurate while defending the veracity of their written agreement.
Gillespie then set about attacking me and NPRI without addressing many of the substantive questions the investigations had raised. Oceguera hoped the story would go away.
It didn't. On Thursday, NPRI published detailed payroll records from the city of North Las Vegas that show Oceguera being paid for 18 hours of work per week during the 2011 legislative session -- twice as much pay as Oceguera and Gillespie repeatedly asserted Oceguera had received.
"I'm just being straight up with you. I don't understand this sheet," Oceguera told Miller last week, adding, "I may be able to get some more clarity after I talk to somebody who can explain this."
Um, how about you? You're the assistant chief, aren't you? The one running for Congress as someone who can "stand up to Washington"?
Those questions should be easy enough for Oceguera to answer. The harder ones, not so much.
Foremost among them: Did the schedule agreements released by Oceguera and Gillespie after NPRI's initial report follow city protocols? The agreements were undated, unsigned and not printed on city letterhead. And they weren't provided to me or NPRI when, separately, we requested information from the city related to Oceguera's pay and schedule during the legislative session. They look like they were cranked out in a hurry.
Skeptics (myself among them) may not ever be able to prove that the men typed up those agreements after the fact to provide themselves cover, but, absent new documentation, Oceguera and Gillespie can't prove that they didn't.
Among the other questions Oceguera and Gillespie have been avoiding:
-- How did Oceguera manage to collect more than $151,000 in wages in 2009 -- a figure that's well above his base annual salary of $138,336 and excludes benefits -- when he was in Carson City for more than four months, supposedly working only 18 hours per week for the department? After all, as he and Gillespie have pointed out, Oceguera is salaried. How did he make up for those lost hours, and then some, on a fixed salary?
-- Will Oceguera take a leave of absence from North Las Vegas as he runs for Congress -- a full-time job in itself -- or will he draw full pay as he campaigns over the next 15 months, attending every special event and photo op while asserting that he's "salaried" and, rest assured, he's putting in his hours?
Considering Oceguera was paid for hours he said he didn't work (according to his agreement with Gillespie, at least), and considering North Las Vegas is so broke that children begged the City Council on Wednesday to keep a recreation center open, Oceguera should, at a minimum, reimburse the city for the wages he was not entitled to.
Whatever Oceguera does and whatever excuses he makes, he'll have the full backing of Gillespie. In his letter to the editor, published by the Review-Journal July 5, Gillespie wrote, "We should be encouraging more firefighters and public safety officers to lead our community, not less. It is exactly the type of real-world experience that we desperately need in our public officials."
The public sector as the "real world"? Where tax revenues pour into monopolies as a requirement of law? Where unions call the shots even as they disappear from the job-creating private sector? Where millions upon millions of bureaucrats are insulated from competitive pressure?
In fact, our Founding Fathers warned against allowing people to assume multiple roles in government, saying it allows individuals to amass too much power at the expense of the public. That kind of power allows an assistant fire chief, doubling as a legislative leader, to wield more authority than his chief, mayor and City Council combined -- and call into question whether he's getting special treatment.
And so John Oceguera, the double-dipping, schedule confusing, tax hiking, separation-of-powers violating firefighter/lawmaker who apparently can't read a paycheck, will ask you to send him to Washington to avert economic ruin and restore fiscal sanity to the nation's capital.
Provided, of course, he can keep his britches from burning whatever credibility he has left.
Glenn Cook (gcook@reviewjournal.com) is a Review-Journal editorial writer.
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Oceguera learned from the best: Richard Perkins. Perkins ripped off the city of Henderson and taxpayers generally for years. While working in the State Assembly he drew a salary from the city of Henderson for his position in the Henderson Police Dept. When prosecuted for violation of the Hatch Act, Henderson paid one of the nation's top Washington law firms to represent him at several hundred dollars per hour. He was convicted but then prevailed on appeal, basically arguing that in the Police Dept he didn't handle any programs receiving federal money. That is to say, his defense was "I really didn't do anything for the Henderson Police Dept." Why did Henderson taxpayers pay for Perkins' defense? Because he was one of the entrenched Good Ole Boys in Henderson. And mainly because he was very close to the City Attorney herself, Shauna Hughes. Is it any coincidence that Perkins and Oceguera are such good friends?
Perhaps to give Oceguera more credit for the things he did do off the clock, I would LOVE to read another editorial focused on his conversations with the Justices. Not everyone has forgotten about it.
Mr. Cook, I think you are being unfair. After all, Oceguera spent a lot of time "after hours" speaking to Supreme Court Justices. Shouldn't he get a little extra pay for that??
Glenn speaks the truth !!
POOR TAXED OUT... Just more of the same nothing as allways. When you only know how to communicate like you do your not credible. One more thing new material please you are becoming sad at best. Ya I work monday and we will shop but not at cosco and we will work out. I am sorry that that burns you.
...FEDup... your respect means nothing those that we run on never say don't save our lives we read all those rj editoria sections.
Where is he criminal indictment? This guy would be a great start to it. The number of public employees raping the state to the tune of more than 1/2 million a year each is staggering - including a firefighter (chrome polisher/hose holder) making nearly $800,000 a year. http://www.transparentnevada.com/salaries/all/
vote them out......take a break from the xbox tournaments at your station and pick up a paper.
All papers have editorial sections.
Everytime a firefraud posts and shows their ignorance, i would lose a little more respect for them...if i had any left.
heyyyyyyyyy, ff & pathetic parasite on the taxpayers back, did you just wake up from your overtime nap an now going to eat till your sleepy again or is it time for a lil socializing at the local fitness center while you get call back pay, lmao, or if you just got back from there.....a lil movie watching time before you have another lil nap ? Just go back to sleep and collect your overtime, pathetic parasite sucking up other peoples money.
Typical LVRJ I hate public employees and the middle class. If the LVRJ had their way they would pay everyone the minimum wage just so they could make millions more in profit.
POOR TAXED OUT... Just more of your same BS. Mom and pops continue to be proude. Hope your kids don't read your posts . Most adults teach kids to not call names. But then again you are TAXED OUT in one of the least taxed states in the country. It's funny you call others a joke.