Weathering THE RECESSION

Public-sector workers repaid with contempt

As members of the city's largest employee union, we have repeatedly tried to negotiate concessions that are fair to both the residents and employees of the city of Las Vegas. We understand that the economy has changed. We know that times are difficult and that, the public sector, like the private sector, must be willing to share the pain. We understand that and now, more than ever, we know that mature judgment, honesty and respect are called for.

But that is not the environment that exists today at City Hall.

Rather than a fair and balanced approached, Mayor Oscar Goodman has threatened to fire all of the city employees and rehire new workers at a rate of 8 percent less than what the prior wages were. When employees didn't immediately give the mayor everything he dictated, he threatened to double the number of layoffs.

These employees are human beings. Many of us have made a career of working for the city. Like everyone else, we need our jobs. We have mortgages too. Many of our workers are single parents or one-income families. These types of attacks aren't the basis of a mature, measured approach that takes into account that people's economic futures are at stake.

The citizens of this community deserve better, and these workers shouldn't have to expect, nor do they deserve, to hear the mayor's "threat of the week." This isn't a game. You don't taunt people and then claim a position as their leader.

From the city's rejection letter dated May 18, it is apparent that the city is still demanding the 8 percent wage cuts and holding everything else. The city asked for several concessions from employees with no guarantee that any of the employees would keep their jobs. The proposal included flattening all wage increases: no cost-of-living adjustments, no step increase and a freeze on longevity pay; furloughs; a four-day workweek; splitting the PERS rate increase with employees; no guarantee on employee restorations from layoff lists; and an allocation method for placing people at lower jobs classifications on a lower pay grade -- if they are hired back. This has been pretty much a one-sided negotiation process with the Las Vegas City Employees' Association being the only party willing to negotiate.

We would have been far more willing to consider the proposal by the city of Las Vegas, but there literally was no end to their demands. Even if we would have completely accepted the entire package, there were no guarantees that there would not be another round of layoffs. We understand that the economy could worsen. We know that no one has a way to predict the future in these uncertain times. But those kinds of considerations can be easily dealt with. Pick an economic indicator or indicators, if the economy worsens according to those indicators, agree to return to the bargaining table.

But that is not what happened. We were dictated a take it or leave it proposition. Accept it, and we can still lay workers off next week. Don't accept the bottomless pit approach to our concessions, and we will use the media to make employees out to be the bad guys. Not exactly the kind of negotiating that makes grown-ups rush for their pens.

Moreover, we know what happens when an agreement is actually reached. Las Vegas firefighters had an agreement in principle. The City Manager Betsy Fretwell shook hands on the deal. Do you know where the deal got firefighters? Nowhere. Apparently, Mayor Goodman has no qualms about going back on the agreement. This wasn't a proposal. It was an agreement with acceptance all around the table. How are we to negotiate, knowing that any agreement essentially means nothing? They, not us, have rendered their word meaningless.

There has been a good deal of attention focused by the media on ongoing negotiations. It has become great sport to follow the party line coming from City Hall while blaming employees for not going along. We thought it was time that citizens knew how much we are willing to be part of the solution and the way our positive efforts, after years of faithful service to this community have been repaid with nothing but contempt by their elected officials.

Don King is president of the Las Vegas City Employees Association.

Trending topics:

• budget cuts
• city employees association
• city of Las Vegas
• contract concessions
• Don King
• public employee unions

Comments

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

1. Allie.Smith Jun. 1, 2010 | 2:45 p.m. Report Abuse

   [First, thank you to the RJ for actually publishing something other than an article that's FOR the mayor, council and/or city manager.] To all you non-city workers who choose to comment... think about your employer asking you for a total of 27% of your salary with NO promises of you even keeping your job. Hhhuummm. What do you have to loose if you might lose your job anyway? Even aside from that, ALL the unions HAVE offered significant concessions that will save the taxpayers money. It's the mayor's way or the highway! Don't be fooled. The mayor is not looking out for the taxpayer's best interest. He's looking out for his own interests... just look to the Mob Museum as one example. I laugh at all your comments here... you'd be whistling a different tune if you were a government employee and you actually had all the information of what's really going on.

2. Cherokee.Mankiller May 30, 2010 | 3:58 p.m. Report Abuse

   Hey King,
   
   You want some cheese with all that whine?
   
   For years, you so-called union leaders have been throwing the taxpayers and public you're supposed to serve under the bus. Now that there isn't even the hay to feed your sacred cows, you want to cry foul. You're now even willing to throw your own members under the bus that realize there is no money to pay for the outrageous salaries and benefits you have demanded.
   
   Well, the time for your temper-tantrums has run out. Simply put, the well has run dry. Either you and your members come to grips with reality, or see you at the Home Depot parking lot.

3. vegaslee May 30, 2010 | 2:08 p.m. Report Abuse

   Government workers need to understand they are not paid by the Government, they are paid by the public taxpayers.
   
   Taxpayers have become poorer in the last few years. When income decreases then expenditures have to decrease also. Services to the public also has to decrease. The public cannot and should not expect as much or more services from the Government or their employees when the money is not there.
   
   The problem with many and the Unions, they look out for their own and not for the good of all. The Unions have to do that because that is what the workers are paying for but sometimes there has to be a broader picture.
   
   This is a time of shared sacrifice for all.
   
   Nevada is known for some of the highest paid government employees in the country. It is time that they get in line with the incomes of the people that are supporting them.

4. Tony.Wright May 30, 2010 | 11:32 a.m. Report Abuse

   The taxpayers are human beings. Many of us have a job and are not working for the city. Like everyone else, we need our jobs. We have mortgages too. Many of our taxpayers are single parents or one-income families. These types of taxes aren't the basis of a mature, measured approach that takes into account the effects of high taxation that unions foist on the People's economic well being.
   
   Well, There will be more layoffs and you can take that to the bank. Obama will see to it through higher taxes and more onerous regulations. This will cause further contraction of both tourism and disposable income here. But that is his plan. The Unions are working hand in glove with him and should be removed from all government positions. Unions need to be removed from the bargaining table.

5. RHG May 30, 2010 | 8:17 a.m. Report Abuse

   The only contempt being shown here is the contempt public-sector workers have for the private sector workers that pony up the taxes for their lavish salaries and benefits. Hell, the firefighters were more then happy to try and takeover ambulance duties and put these private businesses out of business putting many private sector workers in the unemployment line. "Better them, then us" is their view of the situation.

6. All American May 30, 2010 | 6:31 a.m. Report Abuse

   Good piece, Don. Despite what the Mayor says, he's trying to break the Unions plain and simple. Keep up the good fight !