Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

Opinion


LETTERS: Put aside re-election interests for nation's good

To the editor:

President Barack Obama's call for increased exports to help us get out of the recession and to generate additional jobs is best implemented by the reduction of corporate income tax rates to equal those of our foreign competitors. This should immediately help in putting our unemployed back to work.


Most Popular Stories
  • VIN SUPRYNOWICZ: What stops mass murderers? A gun
  • SHERMAN FREDERICK: Call evil by its rightful name
  • EDITORIAL: Terrorism on trial
  • EDITORIAL: A pre-9/11 approach to terror
  • LETTERS: Public-sector workers are still doing well
  • LETTERS: Harry Reid: Working hard for all Americans
  • EDITORIAL: They took our jobs!
  • EDITORIAL: 'That's the ticket!'
  • Our politicians are the greatest, all right
  • EDITORIAL: I believe in free speech, but ...




  • The resulting lower costs of goods and services also would result in increased domestic sales, as was demonstrated in the "Cash for Clunkers" program, under which consumers were required to spend money in order to benefit from the cost savings, rather than receiving a cash payment that went toward savings and debt reduction and did not help the economy.

    The remainder of the stimulus funding should be redirected to reduce taxes without the need for any additional deficit funding.

    The politicians must set aside their personal interests -- getting re-elected -- and instead be more concerned with the immediate plight of our unemployed.

    Henry Schmid

    LAS VEGAS

    Reid fan

    To the editor:

    During the early years of my adult life, I became aware that my silence during a debate -- be it political or of some other nature -- was often misunderstood as agreement. During my 47 years in Las Vegas, I closely followed the political scene from the outside, as I'm sure many of your readers do. During the past several years, I have read the letters to the editor and various other columns to the point that I cannot remain silent without the fear that I might be considered in agreement with them.

    The letters and columns that I'm referring to dealt with Sen. Harry Reid of Nevada. They have been extremely negative and very defaming of a man I have respected.

    I have followed Sen. Reid and several other candidates throughout the years. I feel strongly that Sen. Reid has always done an honest and credible job in every position he has held. I have never seen the senator duck a problem, nor have I ever seen him take a side that wasn't his personal and truthful position.

    Sen. Reid has never been owned by any group. He has very much been a man of the people.

    As a young man and now an older man, I was aware that internal rot in politics is the greatest threat to this country. I feel comfortable with the good senator representing us in Washington and I give him my one vote to continue to do so. I have strong feelings for President Harry S Truman, and I'm sure Sen. Reid has the same attitude that President Truman had when he said, "The buck stops here."

    Kenneth Divich

    LAS VEGAS

    Bad form

    To the editor:

    GOP Senate candidate Sue Lowden was recently on the radio talking about the 1981 attempted car bombing of Sen. Harry Reid.

    After being disrespectful to one of our country's leaders, how can she continue to run for office?

    Let's hope she has learned her lesson and will stick to the Democrat-approved strategy of going before local schoolchildren and calling the president a loser.

    FRANK Alumbaugh

    NORTH LAS VEGAS

    Jobs and Reid

    To the editor:

    It's a full year before we get to celebrate a Harry Reid retirement party, but my evening meal is yet again being interrupted by one of Sen. Reid's sickening campaign ads. This one features Wall Street veteran and current MGM Mirage CEO Jim Murren talking about how proud he is of Sen. Reid "helping" him save CityCenter. Makes one wonder what kind of promises Sen. Reid had to make to Mr. Murren's 50 percent partners in Dubai. Perhaps he traded his hole in the ground at Yucca Mountain.

    Don't these economic geniuses understand those 12,000 jobs "saved" simply come at the expense of another venture not undertaken, or are being cannibalized from existing properties on the Strip?

    Do they really think they were conjured up from nothing?

    At least the ad gives us insight into the thought process of the mind that developed this white elephant in the first place.

    DOUGLAS HUNTER

    LAS VEGAS

    What choice

    To the editor:

    Current House legislation will ban my high-deductible health care plan. My wife and I are covered by Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield for $620 per month with a $3,000 annual deductible each. At 55-plus, we are very pleased with the plan, and it has covered our expenses as expected, including one week of hospitalization last year.

    This plan was our choice.

    If the House legislation passes, I will be offered more choices? But not my current plan? And pay higher taxes?

    Huh?

    Gee, I wish I was as smart as Nancy, Harry and Barry so I could understand this.

    Tony Righellis

    LAS VEGAS

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 28 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    patrick wrote on November 05, 2009 11:03 PM: GH:

    I guess the only thing I have to say is; thanks for saying that normally I'm above this kind of stuff.

    Guess I'm not perfect after all.

    Thanks for reminding me, now my girlfriends in good company.


    GH wrote on November 05, 2009 08:13 PM: patrick, I'm just pointing out the irony that you didn't attack the content of her message, you just responded to the fact she disagreed with the President and therefore attacked her as misbegotten and again in your last post as woebegone.

    Maybe I missed something but it appears you are labeling her as disreputive and inferior simply because she's speaking out against the President.

    And how have her parents failed her? By teaching her to stand up for her rights? By teaching her not to follow the crowd? By teaching her to speak her mind?

    We've had many back and forths about the President, Congress, etc and usually it's about facts, figures, reports, hopes, dreams, etc. This is one of the rare times were I've seen you ignore the content and go after the person.

    All I'm saying is it's not your normal style to simply throw out insults without substance and in light of the content of the story I found that ironic.


    patrick wrote on November 05, 2009 06:49 PM: GH:

    Wait a minute, I'm trying to digest what it is you are saying.

    First you seem to be applauding someones freedom of speech, then telling me that I should be applauding her as well, THEN you tell me that I shouldn't criticize this girl (which of course means that you think I shouldn't be able to speak my mind about her, thus inhibiting my freedom of speech)

    And yes I am a liberal, but what that has to do with supporting a girl who is criticizing the President who is acting to help out this poor woebegone child with parents who failed her.


    GH wrote on November 05, 2009 05:19 PM: patrick, what are you even talking about?

    The story is about people trying to suppress someone's freedom of speech and you go on a rant about tax payed education and medicare ????

    I thought you were a liberal! You should be standing up for the girl and applauding her for standing up for her (and our) rights to express whatever opinion we have whether you agree or not.

    The ironic thing is your comment acutally proves the point of the story, agree with Obama or people will criticize and attack you.


    patrick wrote on November 05, 2009 05:00 PM: I blame the parents for this misbegotten child.

    I wonder if dear "Kristin" understands that she is receiving a free education courtesy of the taxpayers?

    Nah, she is probably the child of a parent with a sign reading:

    "Keep the government's hands off my Medicare"

    Kids these days I tell ya.


    continued wrote on November 05, 2009 04:11 PM: continued... and un-American. Their reaction epitomizes the "we're gonna get you" gang mindset and thug aura emanating from the Obama administration. This kid was branded a racist and physically threatened.

    Ladies and gentlemen, I proudly introduce to you courageous high school student, Kristen Campbell. Here is her dad's letter which he gave me permission to share publicly.

    "Kristen wrote this editorial (No thanks, Mrs. Obama ..) for her high school newspaper in February of this year. After the article was published, she underwent attacks from African-American students, parents, local church groups, and members of the community. She was called a racist, threatened with a knife, attacked verbally and physically in the hallways at school, and her vehicle tires were slashed in the school parking lot. Members of some local minority organizations even met to discuss how to retaliate against her and a boycott of her school newspaper was launched.

    Some parents and grandparents asked the school administration to censor her work so that she would be unable to publish controversial editorials in the future, but Kristen went before the administration and stood her ground. Because of her determination, the administration agreed not to censor her work and to allow her to continue to publish editorials without approval from the principal or school board.

    Since then, she has written other conservative editorials and is still getting some resistance from the student body. But she has not backed down.

    Since then she gave a follow up speech (Protecting the Pie) on the subject at a state-level 4-H event and at a meeting of the Choctaw Co. Republican Party.

    She is passionate about what she believes and is eager and ready to speak anytime she is asked. She is hard-hitting and doesn't mince words. We are very proud of her as you can imagine!


    quoted from Lloyd Marcus wrote on November 05, 2009 04:07 PM: Reid & Obama:

    High School student in danger for disagreeing with Obama
    Lloyd Marcus - African American author

    A high percentage of Americans believed race relations would improve with the election of America's first black president. Today, that percentage has dropped dramatically. Could it be because the Obama administration, at every turn, has shamelessly exploited race to further its agenda?

    The message of the liberal media/Obama administration tag team comes across loud and clear. If you disagree with Obama, we will brand you a racist and we will hurt you. If this administration was made into a movie it should be titled, "Mr. Chicago Thug Goes to Washington". Bullying (banks, the auto industry, insurance companies, national Chamber of Commerce, doctors, Fox News and more) appears to come quite naturally to the Obama administration.

    The late great Mary Kay Ash said, "The speed of the leader is the speed of the gang". In other words leadership comes from the top down. When SEIU (Service Employees International Union) thugs attacked and beat a black conservative for selling "Don't Tread On Me" flags at a town hall meeting, I believe the thugs felt Obama would approve. Some believe the thugs acted on orders. Folks, they put Kenneth Gladney, a kind and gentle man in the hospital. Kenneth had been laid off his job. He was selling Gadsden Flags simply attempting to earn a living while spreading his belief in conservative principles.

    As I said, leadership comes from the top down. I wonder what kind of subliminal message the Obama administration is sending to our kids. I received a letter from the father of a brilliant high school student who dared to write an editorial in her high school newspaper disagreeing with Mrs. Obama. The local Obama supporters reaction to this kid's article is unbelievable, outrageous, over the


    Jesse wrote on November 05, 2009 12:14 PM: Uh!, br---wouldn't that be bovine EXCRETIONS??????


    Ken wrote on November 05, 2009 09:07 AM: Some of you chowderheads need to do your own research and not just rely on what your partisan heros tell you.

    As an example, United Healthcare runs about 25% GROSS profit (before cost of revenue). When you subtract taxes and operating expenses you get to the 3-5% net income. This is why pro Obamacare people will cite one number and anti Obamacare people will cite another.

    And for those of you screaming for sources -- Google is your friend. This isn't the Law Review Journal. If you are that mental over the issue, prove someone wrong with your own citations instead of wasting posts demanding them from others.


    br wrote on November 05, 2009 09:02 AM: Those Dingy Harry tv commercials are a big pile of bovine secretions.


    Read All Comments