Comments (13) | Add a comment
EDITORIAL
Taking its toll: Arizona pilot project turned down
Tools
Updated: Feb. 22, 2012 | 9:05 a.m.
Forget being nickeled and dimed. Nevadans have been plucked by the buck, with steady hikes in their water, power and gasoline bills, not to mention ever-higher taxes.
But Silver State residents finally got some good pocketbook news from an unlikely source: Washington. The Federal Highway Administration announced Monday that Arizona's 30-mile stretch of Interstate 15, between Mesquite and St. George, Utah, was not selected for a federal toll road pilot program.
If it had been approved, toll booths would have been built at the highway's Nevada and Utah borders, where passenger vehicles would have been charged between $1 and $3 to cross a nearly uninhabited stretch of Arizona. Commercial trucks would have faced far steeper tolls, ranging from $6 to $10. For the many Nevada and Utah residents who pass through Arizona to visit family or conduct business, such fees would quickly add up. Goods shipped between Canada and Mexico would incur yet another cost to be passed on to customers.
Don't get us wrong -- we don't have a problem with toll roads in general. In fact, tolls are among the fairest ways to fund highway construction and maintenance, because the user pays. Nevada soon might have its first toll road: the Boulder City bypass. The 2011 Legislature passed a bill that could allow private investors to build that stretch of highway and give motorists traveling between Arizona and Nevada a choice: pay a few bucks to take a faster route around Boulder City or pay no toll and take the existing, slower road through town.
The problem with Arizona's proposal was its transparent greed. Arizona greatly benefits from that stretch of I-15 because it provides commercial traffic with a path north out of the state, around the Grand Canyon and through Las Vegas. Yet very few Arizona residents use I-15 because almost no one lives in the far northwestern corner of the state. And Arizona's portion of the interstate will never be widened from four to six or eight lanes -- it would cost far too much money to justify blasting out more of the spectacular Virgin River Gorge.
Tolls, like taxes, are never temporary. Once instituted, they remain -- even as part of a so-called "pilot" program. Although Arizona incurs costs maintaining I-15, such a high toll would quickly turn into a cash cow for other Arizona highways -- ones Nevadans and Utah residents don't use.
A better course for Arizona: Negotiate with Nevada, Utah and the federal government for maintenance support. Nevada has a big stake in keeping all of Interstate 15 safe and smooth -- but not as much as Arizona clearly would like to believe.
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
We drove from Pittsburgh to Niagra Falls and it was just a wonderful drive, despite the tolls roads. And I saw bridges in Buffalo so high that this Las Vegas boy was just overwhelmned. I don't like heights and it made me uncomfortable just to see traffic on bridges several hundred feet in the air.
Sheesh, too many beers, I meant 'isn't that the way life really works?' LOL
But being from the West, I have never experienced a toll road until I go to Pennslyvania and New York, and they are all over the place back there!! You can't stop to go to the john without paying to get off, then getting a new ticket to pay again when you get back on!! It really is quite an experience. But I still love it!!
Excellent points TheShadow, I actually travel this road farily frequently and therefore have to be against this becoming a toll road but I didn't quite understand the logic of the RJ editorial board here either; they are for toll roads, just not this particular toll road.
And of course I was kidding, sort of, of 'having' to be against this toll road because I myself use this road but isn't that they was life really works?
At 20 miles per gallon, $.52 per gallon tax, I pay $.025 per mile tax already. How much more do you want?
All the mormon fire thugs commuting between St. George and Vegas would have been pi$$d; if this happened...
Old US 91 bypasses I15 through the gourge, exact same situation.
Well, truth be told, I wouldn't have minded the drug cartels paying tolls and passing the costs onto their customers.
"I'm from the government and I'm here to help...
I'm glad Arizona's toll plan was shot down, but ...
The logic of this editorial is a mystery. How can you say: "Don't get us wrong -- we don't have a problem with toll roads in general. ..." and then turn around and say you are against it because "The problem with Arizona's proposal was its transparent greed. " What??? So toll roads are good if they are not inspired by greed? Interesting concept.
The reason to be against this scheme is because we don't want States netting out traffic flow and putting up toll booths all over Federal highways everywhere a road doesn't "serve" the State. It would turn the highway system into a crazy quilt of toll ways and freeways.