Comments (27) | Add a comment
EDITORIAL
The soda pop tax
Tools
Updated: Apr. 10, 2012 | 10:59 a.m.
Although President Barack Obama "expressed interest" last summer in a punitive tax on sugared soft drinks, the Chicago Tribune reports, a key congressional committee, "after initially seeming receptive, ended up refusing to consider it."
Why? A handful of black and Hispanic groups protested, arguing it would hit minorities the hardest. And just when the tax seemed like such a natural to the nanny-staters!
"We are on the moral high ground here," proclaimed the sponsor, Rep. Linda Sanchez, D-Calif., a member of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee. "We can improve health outcomes and get more revenue."
Analysts at Yale recently calculated that a penny an ounce tax on sugary soda pop would induce a 23 percent drop in soda consumption. But the Congressional Budget Office estimated a smaller tax could raise $50 billion over 10 years.
"While the extent to which such a tax might drive down obesity rates is scientifically unclear, nutrition experts argue that it would, at the least, improve health by discouraging consumption of sodas, which have no nutritional value but are packed with calories," the Tribune reports.
The "industry," though, wanted no part of "a full-scale national debate on sweetened soft drinks and their effect on health -- and the nation's ever-higher medical bill."
But if private consumers of soda pop, beer, cigarettes, or anything else face higher medical bills because of their habits, how does that become "the nation's" medical bill? If socialized medicine justifies the government attempting to manipulate the healthiness of our lifestyles through punitive taxes on anything of which the government disapproves, isn't that simply an argument against socialized medicine?
When do we ban motorcycles?
What's pathetic is that such battles must be fought, at all.
When do-gooders such as Rep. Sanchez seek to use taxation to target and manipulate the behavior of specific minorities, that's not "the moral high ground." To the contrary, they are morally wrong, and almost certainly in violation of their oaths to "protect and defend the Constitution" of a limited government.
In addition to which, it rarely works.
Trending topics:
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
"On the other hand, a 23% drop in soda consumption would do the health of this country a lot of good."
True. Why don't you stop drinking soda and teach your kids to do the same. That can be done without a tax or any government action at all.
as the osama ship sinks so will the demands for higher taxes levied on all citizens. the only question will be the order in which those taxes will be applied. and the newspeak spin, the lipstick on the pig, to get the "progressive" stooges to gobble up the "opportunity".
soda tax sounds easy. then why not also a tax based on some sugar, salt, or grease percentage in all consumables ? all could be justified by the neo[communists] as saving the citizens' health. "for the children" is the usual red herring.
of course to "oversee" the sugar/salt/grease content tax collection, the "change" regime would need some multi-thousand peeped bureaucracy with yet another commissar. then the oaf could add those new, professional pant seat polishers to the "created" jobs category.
I gotta say its refreshing to hear Patrick come out in favor of taxation; he might be learning something here after all.
Good job man!