Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - Opinion

Saturday
Jul 31, 2010
Clouds And Sun
Clouds And Sun 101° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

sponsored by
Opinion


GEOFF SCHUMACHER: UNLV needs new stadium

The firing of UNLV coach Mike Sanford has rekindled debate over what it takes to have a strong college football program here. While critics blame Sanford for failing to win games, others, including Sanford himself, contend that subpar facilities and tepid community support contributed to his inability to build a successful program.

Everybody's right.


Most Popular Stories
  1. Hispanics and illegal immigration
  2. Do as I say, not as I do
  3. Taxpayers can't afford scholarship
  4. Giving the business
  5. Appointing judges would give voters more say
  6. Feel-good hits of the summer



It's clear from his record of wins and losses that Sanford couldn't get it done at UNLV, and blaming the facilities is a poor excuse. At the same time, Sanford is right that any coach would have a better chance to succeed here with improved facilities and more fan backing.

My two cents: Build a football stadium on or adjacent to the UNLV campus.

I realize this is a tall order. Darren Libonati, who manages Sam Boyd Stadium, about eight miles from campus, estimates a new stadium would cost $250 million.

Adding to the challenge, UNLV is landlocked. To build a stadium, it would need to buy up 10-12 acres in the densely developed area of Maryland Parkway and Tropicana Avenue. This means buying many parcels of land and then tearing down what's on them.

For a government entity to find that kind of money in this economy wouldn't be easy. But let's not say it can't be done. Las Vegas knows better than any place in America that all kinds of audacious things can be done if we want to do them.

A football stadium on campus would not ensure a winning program. But when students and community members congregate on Saturdays in the fall at the university to cheer on the home team, the positive effects spread beyond what happens on the field.

The game-changer

Certain dates stand out in Las Vegas history. There's May 15, 1905, when a land auction populated the Las Vegas townsite. And March 19, 1931, when the state legalized casino gambling. On Dec. 26, 1946, Bugsy Siegel opened the Flamingo Hotel. On July 31, 1969, Elvis Presley debuted at the International.

A more recent date has earned a place on this auspicious list: Nov. 22, 1989. On that day, 20 years ago this weekend, Steve Wynn's The Mirage opened on the Strip.

The Mirage changed everything for Las Vegas. It drew new customers and triggered an unprecedented building boom that transformed Las Vegas from gambling haven to international resort destination.

Las Vegas had plateaued during the '80s, and so when Wynn announced plans for a large new Strip resort, more than a few people questioned his sanity. But Wynn gambled that his vision and more than $600 million would prove those skeptics wrong.

He succeeded. The Mirage was a smash hit, enticing visitors with its lavish decor, attractions, restaurants and shows. It was an all-encompassing experience in which gambling was just one element. The Mirage's success spurred the development of many more new resorts during the '90s, including the Excalibur, MGM Grand, Treasure Island, the Luxor and others. The Mirage signaled nothing less than a paradigm shift for Las Vegas.

As The Mirage celebrates its 20th anniversary, the skeptics have arisen again to question the wisdom of CityCenter. At $8 billion and opening in a time of global economic turmoil, CityCenter is perhaps an even bigger gamble than The Mirage was. But CityCenter has all the makings of another game-changer for Las Vegas. Perhaps Dec. 16, 2009, will one day earn a spot on the list of memorable dates in local history.

A solar update

In September, two large renewable energy projects in Amargosa Valley, 80 miles north of Las Vegas, were the focus of a New York Times article about high water use by the most economical form of solar power generation: the solar thermal plant.

The article pointed to the obvious dilemma: The sunny, wide-open deserts of the Southwest are great places to erect seas of solar panels, but the water demand of solar thermal technology poses a challenge to drought-ridden states. The Solar Millennium facilities in Amargosa Valley would use 1.3 million gallons of water per year, representing 20 percent of the valley's available groundwater supply.

But in response to public concerns, Solar Millennium announced this week that it will add dry-cooling technology to its Amargosa solar plants, which means a 90 percent reduction in water use. This is excellent news for Amargosa and for Nevada, which has the potential to become a world leader in solar power generation but only if it does things right from the start.

For its part, Solar Millennium says it hopes this improvement in its Amargosa projects will accelerate the approval process and allow construction to begin by the end of 2010.

It should. Those Amargosa plants represent a $3 billion investment in the state economy. The plants will employ 800 construction workers and create 100 permanent jobs. They've never been needed more.

Geoff Schumacher (gschumacher@reviewjournal.com) is the Review-Journal's director of community publications. His column appears Friday.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Comments (27)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

X

Register to comment

* Indicates fields that are required
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Male Female

Already registered? Log in now

X

Already registered to comment?

Log in below
E-mail
Password

Forgot your password? | Register
X

Forgot your password?

Enter your e-mail address below and a password will be resent to you.

Email
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Report abuse

Geoff Schumacher wrote on November 21, 2009 10:55 PM: The commenters who believe UNLV needs to focus on academics make a good point. But it is out of context and fails to see the big picture. Many, many, many academically respected universities across the country also have successful athletics programs. The two pursuits go hand in hand. Consider Stanford, Cal-Berkeley, USC, UCLA, Duke, most of the Big Ten schools (Wisconsin, Michigan, etc.), Texas, Georgetown. Academics and athletics are are mutually beneficial.


Report abuse

Paul Revere Rides Again! wrote on November 20, 2009 04:13 PM: While Nevada ranks at the bottom in educational standards we have folks dreaming of big time football and a new, expensive stadium. Wow! it is hard to believe that such stupidity, ignorance and foolish thinking can exist today.


What the hell are you people thinking about? Do you really believe that millions spent on a football stadium will improve UNLV? In what way would it improve the school overall?


What about investing millions in top notch professors in all academic areas and hiring the very best teachers, not coaches and athletic directors? Tell me how coaches like Jerry Tarkanian and John Robinson improve the academic ranking of UNLV? Tark put the school in the media with a basketball team while the academic rankings plumeted to the bottom and the school gained a reputation as a very low academic reputation that is still well known and associated with UNLV today.


Claiming your athletes are 'scholar athletes' while they are actually nearly illiterate drop outs from high school does nothing to raise the reputation of the school as a whole. That was the stink from previous athletic endeavors that taints the reputation of the school to this day.


Report abuse

Virgil A. Sestini wrote on November 20, 2009 02:27 PM: In 1955 the senior class of LVHS and other area high schools raise the original monies to match state funds to purchase the land UNLV now sits on. Unfortunately, the state legislature did not see fit to think ahead and purchase land in a more suitable area like that where Red Rock Resort now sits with its scenic view of RR Canyon.


Unfortunately, the land that was purchsed was available and cheapest we could afford at the time. Now, the university is in a very undesirable location with the flight path of airliners overhead hourly and daily. This is not a desirable or even feasible site for a future football stadium should someone come up with the millions of dollars needed to construct it and parking areas adjoining it.


This dream of a stadium arises from those who see UNLV as some future football powerhouse with potential to attract large crowds and ability to play against big time, big name schools at a very competitive level; that is not likely, and remains a 'pie in the sky' idea for jocks, would-be jocks and wanna-be jocks to dream and speculate about.


UNLV needs to concentrate on top academic professors not big name coaches and athletic directors. This school has always had the potential of being a great one with great academic leadearship as its bigges asset for this region and state.


UNLV doesn't even have an electron microscope yet, but some dream of a new football stadium. Arizona State has several EM's, UC Berkley as at least a dozen and in the meantime we dream of new athletic locker rooms with weight lifting paraphenalia. The priorities and dreams are all ascewed withe the wrong emphasis.


Sorry, football fans but you will have to dream awhile longer!


Report abuse

Allen wrote on November 20, 2009 02:16 PM: Brandon,

Why on earth would the casinos want to chip in on a stadium? They get no benefit from UNLV's home games (home team rule means no bets on the game when the home team is playing).

Also, if the guests are down the road watching the Rebels lost for 4 hours, they aren't on the casino floor. That's not something the casinos want to encourage.


Report abuse

Bobby.Gladd wrote on November 20, 2009 02:09 PM: "GEOFF SCHUMACHER: UNLV needs new stadium"
______

I need a new Lexus.

UNLV needs to focus on improving on its educational obligations.


Report abuse

Virgil A. Sestini wrote on November 20, 2009 02:08 PM: I can't imagine some future UNLV team playing in the Rose Bowl or against some other team for the national football championship; but, I can dream of UNLV becoming a nationally recognized school for academics like science or other fields. The former is not likely at all no matter who looks into the future crystal ball, but the latter is a dream, a vision that is very possible and achievable.


The university needs to concentrate on its academic programs and minimize the emphasis on athletics. The days of football games and 'rah,rah' and college kids in racoon coats and zoot suits at pep rallies are for Any Hardy movies of the past. College athletics as once existed is no more...it is big business and not at all for the morale and school spirit lore of the past.


The university should seek fiancial resources to attract and retain the finest faculty in all academic areas; when an outstanding faculty of real scholastic quality the enrollment of UNLV will boom and the entire state will prosper for advancements in all aspects of education from such an investment.


Those that dream of big time football locally are really wasting their time and energy. This is not,will never be the true destiny of UNLV but is a pipe dream of many who have no idea of what college education is all about.



Report abuse

Cavin Barnum wrote on November 20, 2009 01:17 PM: Geoff Schumacher you must be from back east where large football stadia exist...it is never going to happen here in Las Vegas.


Dream on ole buddy, UNLV will never be the big powerhouse you dream of and hope that you will be the major sports writer for future UNLV major bowl game bids. You dream of UNLV football playing for the national championship...right? It will never happen. Its a pipe dream, a dream of those who smoked too much pot and wasted their brains in journalism school.


The past football season will be the vision of the future for the next several decades...UNLV will continue to have trouble beating a good Triple A high school team...sad, true and reality...


Report abuse

jpcortez wrote on November 20, 2009 11:38 AM: The Paradise Elementary School (across the street from the T&M would be almost the right size. They would need to buy some of the houses for parking. The T&M can handle the parking for about 20,000 people so they would need to get enough parking for only 20,000 people. It would be a boon for the business around UNLV and it is close to the strip. Get it done.


Report abuse

Brandon wrote on November 20, 2009 11:21 AM: My question, Why not build a "stadium" on or near the strip, have the local cacino's chip in and with some tax dollars, use the stadium for UNLV football, NFL preseason games or Super bowl, Nutral Site NCAA football games (Ohio St. vs USC, OU vs BYU, Notre Dame vs anyone). I think that would not only book hotel rooms, but give the strip some more diversity with a solid Sports presence.


Report abuse

Build the Stadium wrote on November 20, 2009 11:07 AM: Finally someone in the media brings the stadium situation to the forefront.

However, the footprint of the stadium would take up 14 acres and would need to be 30 acres if you want parking and tailgating areas.

The truth is, there are MANY sites on or around the campus to locate the stadium. People I know that own some of that land have had UNLV people/boosters inquire about purchasing the land in the past few years.

If the will is there, it CAN be built. It SHOULD be built. It HAS to be built.


Read All Comments