Comments (6) | Add a comment
J.C. Watts
Which America will it be after 2010?
Let's take stock of where the United States is going.
The nation has a $1.4 trillion deficit and is $13 trillion in debt. Retirement security for millions of Americans is in jeopardy. The new health care law slashes Medicare by $500 billion over 10 years, destroys the traditional doctor-patient relationship and imposes new taxes. Continuing illegal immigration takes jobs from unemployed Americans, and the illegals take from strained taxpayer services ranging from health care to education.
If the United States was a private company that was jeopardizing its employees due to mismanagement, fraud and manipulating the books, every member of Congress would be screaming bloody murder and the congressional mantra would be, "Throw management in jail."
The good news is that growing numbers of Americans are becoming more educated about what is going on (and not going on) in Washington. The Tea Party movement is helping in this process. People are realizing that local, state and federal governments are running out of money, yet they continue to tax and spend -- and, in the process, our freedoms are being eroded.
Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., actually had the gall to tell a Christian Science Monitor breakfast that voter attacks against Washington are hypocritical. He said, "those who condemn spending want to keep their Social Security and Medicare benefits and want a big government role in the Gulf oil disaster recovery. There's a huge contradiction on a daily basis."
What an elitist liberal attitude. He's saying "it's the voters, not the managers" who are at fault!
Even some worried Democrats (but not the Democrat congressional leadership or the Obama administration) are joining Republicans and conservatives in calling for the reduction of spending and debt. Yet congressional Democrat leaders still want a new "stimulus" spending bill and new taxes.
Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., is one of the most articulate economic conservatives to recently emerge on the national scene. His "Roadmap" strategy -- under-reported by the mainstream media -- emphasizes that the truly needy need to be taken care of by government but middle-class entitlements must be reduced for the simple reason that there's no money in the treasury for them.
Ryan and Republicans argue that the new health care bill is a prime example -- it fosters higher health care costs and new taxes. In this regard, conservative scholar William Voegeli has written a biting critique of what he calls the Hundred Years War between the party of "more" and the party of "less." He argues that voters will never fully eradicate the welfare state because they don't want to, but that a worried electorate can pressure their representatives to reject the sort of middle- and upper-class entitlements that are bankrupting the country.
Conservatives have long and rightly argued that governments do not generate wealth. They only distribute it. Jonah Goldberg in National Review writes that the challenge for both liberals and conservatives is simply to define how much distribution is "enough." Goldberg asks: "What would an acceptable safety net look like? Who would be taken care of by taxpayers and for how long?" Rep. Ryan offers answers to those questions in his brilliant "Roadmap," but ideologically driven liberals don't. They simply scoff at conservative caution. Leading liberals maintain there's no such thing as enough -- a position obviously shared by President Barack Obama.
It has been said before, but bears repeating: The 2010 congressional races are shaping up to be the most important elections since The Great Depression. Will the Democrats be allowed to continue controlling the Congress and proceed to expand government, the deficit and the debt? Or will the voters elect a Republican majority pledging to put the brakes on President Obama's policies and the dismantling of the private enterprise system? (And will Republicans keep their word this time?)
The 2010 elections and the 2012 presidential election will decide which historic and crucial path America will take. Will we soon become a country like the debt-ridden European Union whose standing in the world continues to weaken? Will we continue to see an America whose allies don't trust us and our enemies no longer fear us? Or will we take the path whereby our managers reinstitute fiscal sanity and enhance our homeland and border security?
There is such a thing as "enough." The voters who are mocked by the likes of Senator John Kerry must send that message loud and clear.
J.C. Watts (JCWatts01@jcwatts.com) is chairman of J.C. Watts Companies, a business consulting group. He is former chairman of the Republican Conference of the U.S. House, where he served as an Oklahoma representative from 1995 to 2002.
Trending topics:
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
The question is: who is "truly needy"? And, do you still qualify as "truly needy" if the aggregate of what you pull out of the public trough every year amounts to the disposable income of a middle class family, which must make ends meet without a dime of government largesse because its income from actually working exceeds the government's eligibility guidelines?
J.C. Watts ignores that much of that debt that so concerns him can be attributed to the Bush tax cuts. He voted for the 2001 tax cuts and was in support of the 2003 tax cuts, but not in the House then. Both of these tax cuts were written to end at the end of this year. This was done because they were unsustainable.
The 2003 tax cut ended the estate tax this year. Because of that law, when Dan Duncan, who had been the 74th richest American, died in March his $9 billion estate will not be taxed. This because of the 2003 law that was rammed through in reconciliation with 50 votes and Dick Cheney as the tie breaker.
In addition, it was the Republican Senators who filibustered a bill to restore pay as you go.
As to John Kerry's comment, Watts likely relied on a rather distorted US News and World article. Asked about the anger and whether he ever saw this much anger. He spoke of the 1960s being of period with at least as much anger. But the anger is less focused. He said it stemmed from jobs paying less, kids not being able to afford college, benefits declining, illegal immigrants entering and no one doing anything - and the sense that Washington is not listening. He spoke of the anger being legitimate - completely legitimate.
Here is a link to the video of that CSM breakfast. http://fora.tv/2010/05/26/Monitor_Breakfast_Senator_John_Kerry
While millions of Welfare thugs get FREE Food (EBT cards to swipe at Trader Joes, Whole Foods etc) and subsidized Housing, it is not enough for honest Conservatives to be aggressive on their Taxes. Such Giving and Subsidization is another indirect BLOW and indirect tax on the Conservative. It violates the Human Rights of those who do not receive such special treatment. QUESTION: What can Conservatives do when they don't get Free Food (EBT card) or Free Housing?
If we, the voters, don't do something our national debt in 2014 will be 102% of the U.S. GDP, meaning that this country and its money will be virtually worthless anywhere in the world. Until we can find some representatives that are fiscally responsible and will reign in government growth and spending, this country will continue the slide into the same situation Greece has found itself in. Once upon a time, people of the world looked up to the United States. Now, with the apologetic Joke-in-Chief in charge, we are the laughing stock of the world and we are being discounted as the clowns of the world. Without some kind of federal fiscal responsibility, this country is going to go down the crapper without a whimper of sympathy from the rest of the world.
This is why Sharron Angle's position on getting rid of Social Security and Medicare makes so much sense. Let's throw the bums out and their socialist programs. The founding fathers never intended for the federal government to take care of ANYONE. We nee Republicans in office to cut these UNCONSTITUTIONAL ENTITLEMENTS and privatize them. Let big business do what it does best, turn a profit for US!
Excellent editorial. And one more point, we are more of a 'Christian Nation' than Obama wants to admit. As he cancelled the National Day of Prayer in May, he held a special 'Muslim Day' and of all places - at the White House. And why are they exempt from the healthcare mandate? And who else is sneaking through the Mexico border - other than Hispanics?