Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

Sports


Packers look like best team in weak NFC North

Green Bay gets slight nod over Bears, Vikings

Several NFL teams with weak resumes still have an opportunity to chart a path to the playoffs and make some noise.

Someone has to win the NFC North. Green Bay, Chicago and Minnesota are starting fresh with six games remaining, logjammed atop the division at 5-5.


Most Popular Stories
  • Donaire, 'still growing,' to battle for WBA title
  • Former Gonzaga standout faces test
  • BATTLE PLAN: UFC challenges NFL to fight
  • UFC 100: Mir finally quits his day job
  • UFC 100: Lesnar: Action and words
  • UFC 100: Lesnar: Action and words
  • UFC 100: Lesnar learns his lesson
  • Well-traveled Banks may not be in Raptors' plans
  • BETTING: Books take down bettors with Lesnar's win
  • UFC 100: St. Pierre yearns to be best
  • UFC's Top Ten Cards




  • The Bears are poised to grab the division lead today as 8-point road favorites against the dismal St. Louis Rams.

    The Vikings are 2-point road underdogs to the Jacksonville Jaguars, whose chances of reaching the postseason are slipping away. But the Jaguars could have a big say in who wins the NFC North, as they play all three contenders by season's end.

    The Packers are looking forward to a Monday night track meet in the Superdome against the New Orleans Saints, who are 21/2-point favorites.

    So who do the oddsmakers project to win the race?

    The Las Vegas Sports Consultants' math models favor Green Bay by the narrowest of margins over Chicago, with Minnesota third.

    LVSC oddsmaker Jason Been said he agrees with those numbers and picks Packers coach Mike McCarthy to prevail.

    "I believe the Packers have the easiest schedule of the three, and McCarthy gets them ready to perform well on the road," Been said. "The biggest differences for me are quarterback Aaron Rodgers' rapid maturity and running back Ryan Grant's improving health. The running game is even more critical late in the year."

    OFFICIATING REVIEW -- It's worth reviewing the train wreck that occurred at the end of the San Diego Chargers-Pittsburgh Steelers game last Sunday. This is not rocket science.

    A touchdown on Troy Polamalu's fumble return was incorrectly taken away from the Steelers, who won 11-10 as 4-point favorites. It was a ridiculous ruling by the officials.

    Laugh all you want at the NHL, but it's the only league that gets instant replay right. Controversial plays are reviewed in a television war room at the league offices in Toronto, quickly and correctly, with the decision relayed back to the on-ice officials.

    Why can't the NFL develop a similar setup?

    Just think, no more refs ducking under a drape with confusion to follow. Every play should be reviewed from upstairs.

    Most coaches can't manage timeouts, let alone try to figure out when to challenge a play. Losing challenges costs teams timeouts. A full complement of timeouts at the end of the game creates more exciting finishes.

    Also, if the red flag is flying around all day, proving the officiating crew to be inept, why should a team ever run out of challenges?

    The referee should wear an earpiece and get his marching orders from the league offices. Most importantly, the correct call gets made.

    And can we please dispense with the nonsense about the length of games? Why are the league and the television networks in such a panic to have something we enjoy so much end so fast at the expense of getting the proper result?

    Brian Blessing, project manager for Las Vegas Sports Consultants, can be reached at bblessing@lvsc.om. Listen to the LVSC oddsmakers on "Sportsbook Radio" at 4 p.m. weekdays on Fox Sports Radio (920 AM). Visit vegassportsconnect.com for more odds information.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 1 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Ted wrote on November 23, 2008 07:54 AM: Finally someone who brings up the question of why(?) it is so important to finish games faster. In college they have sped up the game to the tune of each team losing 12 plays per game. And pro results are similar. Why should I, the paying fan, be shortchanged out of two dozen plays per game, while shelling out MORE money to watch? We want to see more action, not less. And we don't care if we get out of the stadium 15 minutes earlier!