Comments (4) | Add a comment
Nevada sports books win 8 percent as Super Bowl handle rises
-
Photo by John Gurzinski.
The race and sports book at Aliante Station hotel-casino is shown in 2008. » Buy this photo
Tools
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
Updated: Jan. 24, 2012 | 4:19 p.m.
On the field, where Drew Brees led the New Orleans Saints to an upset victory, the Super Bowl featured a surprising finish. At Nevada sports books, the results were more predictable.
The statewide wagering handle of $82.7 million represented a slight increase from the game's 2009 handle, and the books posted a win for the 14th time in 15 years, holding 8.3 percent.
Brees and the Saints, 41/2-point underdogs, overcame a 10-point deficit to defeat the Indianapolis Colts 31-17 on Sunday. The matchup was attractive, but a down economy is showing even the Super Bowl has its betting limits.
A state-record $94.5 million was wagered on the game in 2006. But the handle of $81.5 million last year was an 11.5 percent decrease from 2008.
"I guess what we're seeing is an absolute leveling off," said Jimmy Vaccaro, a longtime bookmaker and the director of operations for Lucky's sports books. "I just think the wall is there ... until the economy turns around."
The state's 182 sports books won $6.85 million for a win of 8.3 percent, according to figures released Tuesday by the Gaming Control Board. The wagering numbers were consistent with 2009, when the books won $6.7 million (8.2 percent).
"I thought we'd see a higher handle around $86 million," Vaccaro said. "But we had our little win, and I'll still take that."
A late rush of wagering on the Saints -- either with the points or at about plus-180 to win on the money line -- cut into the books' profits. But early wagering on the Colts, including some large money-line plays, and parlay cards were major sources of revenue for some books.
One sports book director said parlay cards were a "huge contributor" to the state's win.
"The Las Vegas sports books are getting too greedy by putting out the 'Ties Lose' parlay cards," professional gambler Steve Fezzik said. "When you start putting the number of field goals at 3 and the number of sacks at 3, you're ripping off the public. Those are certainly things that have about a 50 percent chance to land right on the number. I'm not saying it's not legal, but I think it's too greedy to be ripping off the public like that."
On some "Ties Lose" parlay cards, the total pass receptions for the Saints' Reggie Bush was set at four. Bush had four receptions, so everyone who bet the prop was a loser.
Contact reporter Matt Youmans at myoumans@reviewjournal.com or 702-387-2907.
SUPER BOWL BETTING HISTORY
A summary of performances by Nevada sports books for the past 10 Super Bowls:
| Year | Wagers | Win/(Loss) | Win Pct. | Score |
| 2010 | $82,726,367 | $ 6,857,101 | 8.3 | Saints 31, Colts 17 |
| 2009 | $81,514,748 | $ 6,678,044 | 8.2 | Steelers 27, Cardinals 23 |
| 2008 | $92,055,833 | $(2,573,103) | (2.8) | Giants 17, Patriots 14 |
| 2007 | $93,067,358 | $12,930,175 | 13.9 | Colts 29, Bears 17 |
| 2006 | $94,534,372 | $ 8,828,431 | 9.3 | Steelers 21, Seahawks 10 |
| 2005 | $90,759,236 | $15,430,138 | 17.0 | Patriots 24, Eagles 21 |
| 2004 | $81,242,191 | $12,440,698 | 15.3 | Patriots 32, Panthers 29 |
| 2003 | $71,693,032 | $ 5,264,963 | 7.3 | Buccaneers 48, Raiders 21 |
| 2002 | $71,513,304 | $ 2,331,607 | 3.3 | Patriots 20, Rams 17 |
| 2001 | $67,661,425 | $11,002,636 | 16.3 | Ravens 34, Giants 7 |
SOURCE: Nevada Gaming Control Board
Trending topics:
|
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor. Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Joe wrote on February 10, 2010 03:51 PM:
I wonder how the books would have done if the Colts had won and covered.
spamforbobby wrote on February 10, 2010 12:55 PM: Martin, Most books won't let you parlay props off the board. Maybe even none of them. A "ties win" parlay card full of props would be suicidal. As Fezzik mentions in the article, some of those props have a 50/50 shot of landing on the number. I worked at a Strip sportsbook when the Rams/Titans Superbowl landed right on the number. We held about 95% on the Ties Lose Super Bowl card that day. Joe Bama wrote on February 10, 2010 11:32 AM: During football season I Like the ties win cards at Stations (about the only thing I like at Stations)for $20 I can have some action and it has saved quite a few 3 teamers. :) flyermart74 wrote on February 10, 2010 07:47 AM: Ties lose parlay cards are bad for the customers, but good for business. Amazingly alot of people don't know how to bet off the board. We try to teach them but most don't care, they just like the fact that they can bet 5$. |
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Comments (4)
Share your thoughts on this story.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.