Comments (3) | Add a comment
UFL exec acknowledges replay official made mistake on ruling against Locos
-
JESSICA EBELHAR/LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
Locomotives coach Jim Fassel argues with officials after an illegal blitz penalty nullified a fumble recovery by his team in a 27-20 loss to Florida on Saturday at Sam Boyd Stadium. » Buy this photo
Tools
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
Updated: Sep. 22, 2010 | 8:40 a.m.
Jim Fassel has seen his share of bad calls in 36 years of coaching football.
But the Locomotives coach said he would be hard-pressed to recall one that was more egregious than the illegal defense penalty assessed to Las Vegas in the second quarter of its 27-20 loss to the Florida Tuskers on Saturday at Sam Boyd Stadium in both teams' United Football League season opener.
With 9:06 left in the quarter, Tuskers running back Dominic Rhodes was stripped of the ball at the Locos 1-yard line. Las Vegas recovered the fumble to thwart a go-ahead score.
But the play was reviewed. The official in the replay booth ruled Las Vegas had recovered the fumble but was guilty of an illegal blitz. UFL rules stipulate that no more than six defensive players can attack the line of scrimmage on pass plays.
Even though they were attempting to stop a running play, not a pass, the Locos were flagged and Florida retained possession at the Las Vegas 2. Rhodes scored on the next play to put the Tuskers up 14-10.
"I've had my struggles with officials and disagreements over judgment calls," Fassel said. "But the guy in the replay booth damn well ought to know that rule. And the guys on the field should damn well know the rule."
Larry Upson, the UFL's vice president of officiating operations, said replay booth official Carl Taganelli made a mistake.
"He misinterpreted the rule," Upson said. "What happened was Las Vegas had eight or nine guys with a hand on the ground instead of the four they're allowed to have. But this rule only applies on pass plays, and this was clearly not a pass play."
The illegal blitz rule is one of several differences between the UFL and the NFL. Upson said this particular rule is in place to protect the quarterback and offensive linemen, two valuable commodities in a five-team league with 52-player rosters and no practice squads.
"The rules are there to make the game more exciting for our fans and also provide safety for our players," Upson said. "The quarterbacks are our franchise. We have to protect them. Same with the linemen. We can't have them getting overrun by all-out blitzes."
Upson said other UFL rule changes -- such as the "No Tuck" rule, the overtime procedure in which both teams get at least one possession, allowing quarterbacks to intentionally ground the ball without leaving the pocket, and returning fumbles out of the end zone to the original spot of the fumble instead of awarding a touchback -- don't diminish the quality of play. "There are a few subtle changes," he said. "Otherwise, we play straight football."
Upson said he visited each team before the season and explained all the rules and the differences between the UFL and the NFL.
Fassel obviously was paying attention because he knew the illegal blitz rule.
He launched a profanity-laced tirade at referee John Bible and his crew, all of which was captured live on HDNet's television broadcast.
Fassel was not fined by the UFL for his criticism of the officials, and Upson apologized for the error.
"They're human, just like the coaches and players," Upson said of his officials. "It was an unfortunate circumstance. But we're striving for perfection from our officials."
Upson said the replay procedure, in which all reviews come from the booth, will remain in place for the foreseeable future.
"We're happy with our review process the way it currently is," he said. "We have no plans to change it."
Contact reporter Steve Carp at scarp@reviewjournal.com or 702-387-2913.
Trending topics:
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
I was at the game. The football was terrible. I'm sorry, but it wasn't even worth the discounted tickets I purchased from Groupons.
I understand that since they can't carry 3 QBs, they have to protect them. But this rule is going to far. LVRebel already points out why. If you bit on play action you have committed a penalty. Maybe it'll get less awkward as time goes on. But they totally blew that call.
Get out and support the Locos, Las Vegans. This is the closest thing to NFL we'll ever get. Omaha just sold out their game this week. We're the champs and we only draw 9k to the opener. Embarrassing. I've never seen such a crappy sports town. No local pride. Can Vegas prove me wrong? lol Not likely.
This rule makes no sense. The league is basing 6 men attacking the line of pass plays..... what if it's 3rd and 1 and the defense expects a short run, but the offense goes for the pass?? Does that mean the defense will be penalized and the offense can easily get the first down even if they can't complete the play?? Am I missing something here Steve?