Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed

Sports


ED GRANEY: UNLV road win must come this week



UNLV's football team hasn't won a Mountain West Conference road game in four years under Mike Sanford. None. Zilch. Zero.

Oh-and-16.


Most Popular Stories
  • MATT YOUMANS: Sharp money avoids Saints
  • MATT YOUMANS: Underdog bettors profit as Manning takes fall
  • UFC 109: Couture rules by submission
  • BIGGEST GAME OF SEASON: Rebels concede little to BYU
  • ED GRANEY: NCAA proposes March mediocrity
  • Hauck's roster overhaul begins
  • STRESS-FREE NIGHT: UNLV avoids drama
  • 'SEVEN BIG GAMES LEFT': Rising Rebels stay grounded
  • RON KANTOWSKI: Kruger helps UNLV pack Mack again
  • Game, sports book tour live up to hype




  • Oh-for-everyone.

    They have lost to great teams (Utah of 2008). They have lost to forgettable teams (San Diego State of 2008). They have lost to all sorts of teams in between. They have just lost.

    The Rebels open league play against Wyoming on Saturday in the bland and bleak environment that is Laramie, where you might swear the world comes to an end at nearly 7,500 feet.

    But then you remember the Cavalryman Supper Club just outside town has a salad bar stocked with iceberg lettuce, and that all is right with the universe.

    It snowed some the past few days in Laramie. The winds are picking up. It can go from mild to miserable in the time it takes you to count the local hotels whose names don't include the word Inn.

    Laramie does frost like Miami does humidity.

    But none of it should matter to a UNLV team that is a near-touchdown favorite, because there is no better opportunity than now to prove times are different, whether the skies are clear or gloomy.

    Because if oh-and-16 isn't one-and-16 when the sun begins to set over the palatial Days Inn, it will be as inexcusable a result as the Rebels have owned under Sanford.

    Perhaps more than any, and yet I'm still trying to understand the embarrassment that was San Diego State 42, UNLV 21.

    Sanford on Monday spoke about how perception has often defined his team and those it played the past four seasons, that it's time to move on from worrying about how good or bad someone else is and merely existing in the moment.

    Good. Fine. Makes sense.

    Here is this week's moment: Wyoming stinks.

    That isn't perception. It's fact. It's a truth the Rebels can believe or ignore, but what they can't do is lose Saturday and expect anyone to accept they are on better conference footing than in past seasons.

    You can't lose to Wyoming this year and be taken seriously. You can't lose to Wyoming and even whisper a thought about contending in league without being laughed out of the nearest locker room.

    Coaches hate such decrees. They cringe at the hint of any game being viewed as a definite victory. Too bad. It's a fifth season of the same system that is being led by experienced players. The days of losing games such as the one approaching Saturday not only should be over, they must be over.

    "We have to play at a high level all the time," Sanford said. "This is the next game, regardless of all the other factors of what anybody says about perception or what we are supposed to do. It's the next game. It's the only game, and we need to win.

    "Our feeling is to focus on the next game. Forget the past. Forget the future. Just the next game."

    There will never exist such a thing as a bad win, not when you only receive 12 chances per season to get it right. UNLV might have spent the first 30 minutes against Hawaii on Saturday acting as if defending the pass would result in contracting swine flu, but realized at halftime the best way to contest a high-scoring offense is to keep its collective butts on the sideline.

    The more you control the ball, the less someone else can move it, a theory that seems to work for everyone not playing against Peyton Manning.

    UNLV deserves its 2-1 start. It deserved to beat Hawaii, 34-33. It will deserve to beat a Wyoming team that is 1-2, struggled to beat a Football Championship Subdivision team in Weber State at home and was just shut out by a Colorado side that previously yielded 54 points in a loss to mighty Toledo.

    It will deserve to beat a Wyoming team that will start a true freshman (Austin Carta-Samuels) at quarterback under a first-year coach running a spread offense none of the Cowboys seem to have figured out.

    It will deserve it because there is no acceptable alternative. Not in a fifth season against this bad an opponent. Not if things really are different.

    Forget about the past? Then the Rebels must dismiss the thought of oh-and-16 and begin to write a new chapter on the road.

    "I expect to be contending (in the conference)," Sanford said. "Now, there is a lot of water to go under the bridge between now and (season's end). To me, this is where we have to prove it, against a conference opponent on the road.

    "Our goal and expectation is to (win the league). That's our goal. I can't get up every morning if I don't expect to win each game. That's why I go to work. And this week, it's Wyoming."

    The man is a farmer. He gets up early every day.

    And this week, his team doesn't need to win.

    It has to.

    Otherwise, what's really different?

    Las Vegas Review-Journal sports columnist Ed Graney can be reached at egraney@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-4618. He also can be heard weeknights from 11 p.m. to 1 a.m. on "The Sports Scribes" on KDWN-AM (720) and www.kdwn.com.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 52 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    RebeLover wrote on October 01, 2009 09:50 AM: Happy Ex-Nevadan:
    You completely misunderstood my comment.

    UNLV's performance so far this year has been terribly underwhelming. They are not a good football team. I knew that before Hawaii crashed and burned last night.

    Graney's whole point, which seems lost on many of those who have commented, is that Mike Sanford tries to sell this year's team as a bowl contender. He would have us believe that this year's team is different.

    If that were true, according to Graney, this year's team would manhandle a terrible Wyoming team, a Wyoming team that had just gotten shut-out by a Colorado team that gave up 52 points to "mighty" Toledo.
    Unfortunately for Sanford, and for UNLV supporters like myself, the Rebels once again demonstrated their inability to win conference road games. Same old Mike Sanford; same old Rebels.

    Graney has been right about Sanford all along. As long as Mike Sanford is in charge, the Rebels will continue to disappoint.

    Perhaps I should clarify one thing. "On Paper" UNLV is vastly superior to Wyoming. The Rebels beat a DII school by 35 (not 20) and Wyoming squeaked by a comparable team by just a touchdown. At this point in his career, Sanford cannot afford to lose games he is "supposed" to win.

    "Otherwise, what's really different?"


    Happy Ex-Nevadan wrote on October 01, 2009 06:09 AM: RebeLover:
    Much like your hero Graney, you present inane opinions with zero fact to back them up. What is your basis for UNLV being the superior team? That they barely beat Hawaii? That flames out in light of UH losing to LaTech last night. That they beat mighty Sacramento State by 20 points? Fact is, you lost. You can keep deluding yourself all you want. It may just land you a position on the nest of hackery that is the LVRJ sports desk.


    RebeLover wrote on September 30, 2009 06:41 PM: All these idiot Wyoming fans pile on Graney as if he is a UNLV homer. This article hit the bullseye.

    Wyoming is a terrible football team. They will be lucky to win two more games all year.

    UNLV and Mike Sanford are remarkably consistent at flaming out and losing road games, even against awful teams.

    Now, Sanford's back is truly against the wall. Lose to Reno, and his tenure as UNLV football coach is all but over.

    Graney never predicted a UNLV victory. He acknowledged the Rebels are better than Wyoming, which they are, and that a loss would be unacceptable, which it was.

    Graney hit the nail on the head. Sanford is in trouble.


    go rebs wrote on September 29, 2009 12:21 PM: Ed - thanks for the insightful piece on Wyoming. Please keep your opinions to yourself for the Nevada game. I think UNLV has all the help it needs.

    Sincerely,

    the UNLV fanbase.


    Broke n dick wrote on September 29, 2009 06:40 AM: Ed, I admired your master piece editorial. Not only as a Cowboy fan have I framed your article, I'm currently having it printed on the rolls of my toilet paper for reading material as I wipe every morning. Thank you in advance!

    P.S. If I were Coach Sanford, I'd be in your office meeting with your superior trying to find that "end of the earth" location that would accept you and your silly a$$ editorials. But the stench would be to much to move.


    Jeff go COWBOYS wrote on September 28, 2009 09:20 PM: Keep in mind WYOMING fans, this clown ED Graney is a SDSU allum. He's just not good enough to live in San Diego, who would want him any way. Ed if your man enough you should make your way to Laramie for a cold one.YOU WUSSY BOY!!!!!


    WyoFAN wrote on September 28, 2009 08:23 PM: HAHAHAHAHAHAH ED, Nice insight, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH how does 0-17 feel ED HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

    No offense to Rebel fans, UNLV is a great school and I have nothing but respect for you.

    But Ed, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


    AMC wrote on September 28, 2009 01:10 PM: Ed - You fail. Journalism, professionalism, all of the above. Opinion is one thing, but you're just a d!#k. I'm a wyoming fan, and honestly, talent-wise, unlv should have won this game, and they are good enough to compete in the mwc. But, they didn't win. Wyoming is not nearly as bad as you think, but it was also apparent in your article that you hadn't really paid attention to any part of their season to this point. And it's fine, but I couldn't be happier that you have to eat your words. Best of luck to the Rebs for the rest of the season. I'm not one for a lot of words usually, but as for you Mr. Graney - FAIL! SUCK IT! GO POKES!!!


    Bowl? Yeah Right wrote on September 27, 2009 09:46 PM: If Wyoming stinks, UNLV must suck something awful. You got your wish though...inserting yourself into the game and writing something so egrigious that the head coach of the opposition calls you out in his press conference. Take a bow, genious.

    Right after we fire Sanford, you should be next.


    fact checker wrote on September 27, 2009 06:17 PM: FYI, UW's quarterback's first name is Austyn, not Austin. If Ed can't spell the qb's name right, how can we know his thoughts about Laramie aren't also false?


    Read All Comments